Yield of common bean cultivars and castor hybrids intercropped in two cultivation sites with oxisol in the Midwest region of Brazil

Rosane Angélica Reis dos Anjos, C. Lisboa, G. Silva, Valter Vaz, Itamar Rosa Teixeira, Marcos Eduardo, Araújo, P. C. Corrêa, J. H. Mota, A. Silva, A. Lourenço
{"title":"Yield of common bean cultivars and castor hybrids intercropped in two cultivation sites with oxisol in the Midwest region of Brazil","authors":"Rosane Angélica Reis dos Anjos, C. Lisboa, G. Silva, Valter Vaz, Itamar Rosa Teixeira, Marcos Eduardo, Araújo, P. C. Corrêa, J. H. Mota, A. Silva, A. Lourenço","doi":"10.21475/ajcs.21.15.10.p3255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The consortium between bean and castor aims to increase the yield per unit area and sustainability in land use. This system has several benefits, but the use of different genetic materials must be carefully evaluated, especially the behavior of smaller castor hybrids, since little research on their use in a consortium system is available. This study aimed to evaluate the components of production and yield of common bean cultivars and small castor hybrids, in two field experiments conducted in the intercropping and monoculture systems, in 2015/2016 and 2016/2017 harvests, in two cultivation sites in the Midwest region of Brazil. The experiment was arranged in a completely randomized block design, in a 4 x 2 + 6 factorial scheme, composed of four common bean genetic materials of different growth types and colors (Pérola, BRS Esteio, BRS Pitanga, and BRSMG Realce), a consortium with two short castor hybrid cultivars (Tamar and Agima 110204) and six additional treatments and bean and castor genetic material in monoculture, with three replications. Agronomic components and grain yields were determined in both experiments, for bean cultivars and castor hybrids. Bean and castor genetic materials presented the same agronomic performance in the studied agricultural and local crops, regardless of the cropping system. The intercropping between common bean cultivars (BRS Esteio, BRSMG Realce and BRS Pitanga) and castor hybrids (Tamar and Ag Ima) was classified as viable by the area equivalence index, since this index presented values greater than 1.0 for the intercropping between these cultivars. Thus, it is recommended for common bean in a system intercropped with small castor hybrids, regardless of the cultivated genetic material","PeriodicalId":10904,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 19, 2021","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 19, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.21.15.10.p3255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The consortium between bean and castor aims to increase the yield per unit area and sustainability in land use. This system has several benefits, but the use of different genetic materials must be carefully evaluated, especially the behavior of smaller castor hybrids, since little research on their use in a consortium system is available. This study aimed to evaluate the components of production and yield of common bean cultivars and small castor hybrids, in two field experiments conducted in the intercropping and monoculture systems, in 2015/2016 and 2016/2017 harvests, in two cultivation sites in the Midwest region of Brazil. The experiment was arranged in a completely randomized block design, in a 4 x 2 + 6 factorial scheme, composed of four common bean genetic materials of different growth types and colors (Pérola, BRS Esteio, BRS Pitanga, and BRSMG Realce), a consortium with two short castor hybrid cultivars (Tamar and Agima 110204) and six additional treatments and bean and castor genetic material in monoculture, with three replications. Agronomic components and grain yields were determined in both experiments, for bean cultivars and castor hybrids. Bean and castor genetic materials presented the same agronomic performance in the studied agricultural and local crops, regardless of the cropping system. The intercropping between common bean cultivars (BRS Esteio, BRSMG Realce and BRS Pitanga) and castor hybrids (Tamar and Ag Ima) was classified as viable by the area equivalence index, since this index presented values greater than 1.0 for the intercropping between these cultivars. Thus, it is recommended for common bean in a system intercropped with small castor hybrids, regardless of the cultivated genetic material
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在巴西中西部地区两个栽培地点间作普通豆品种和蓖麻杂交种的产量
大豆和蓖麻之间的联盟旨在提高单位面积的产量和土地利用的可持续性。该系统有几个好处,但必须仔细评估不同遗传材料的使用,特别是小型蓖麻杂交种的行为,因为很少有关于它们在联合体系统中的使用的研究。本研究旨在通过2015/2016年和2016/2017年在巴西中西部地区两个种植地点进行的套作和单作两种大田试验,评估普通豆品种和小蓖麻杂交种的生产组成和产量。试验采用4 × 2 + 6因子全随机区组设计,采用4 × 2 + 6因子方案,采用4种不同生长类型和颜色的普通豆类遗传材料(psamoora、BRS Esteio、BRS Pitanga和BRSMG Realce), 2个短蓖麻杂交品种(Tamar和Agima 110204)和6个附加处理,采用单栽培的豆类和蓖麻遗传材料,共3个重复。在两个试验中,测定了大豆品种和蓖麻杂交种的农艺成分和籽粒产量。大豆和蓖麻遗传物质在所研究的农业作物和地方作物中表现出相同的农艺性能,无论种植制度如何。根据面积等效指数(面积等效指数均大于1.0)将普通豆种(Esteio、Realce和Pitanga)与蓖麻杂交种(Tamar和Ag Ima)间作划分为可行。因此,建议将普通豆与小蓖麻杂交种间作,无论栽培的遗传物质如何
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Control of malodorous gases emission from wet-end white water with hydrogen peroxide Application of spruce wood flour as a cellulosic-based wood additive for recycled paper applications— A pilot paper machine study Corrosion damage and in-service inspection of retractable sootblower lances in recovery boilers Kraft recovery boiler operation with splash plate and/or beer can nozzles — a case study Application of Machine Learning in Gas-Hydrate Formation and Trendline Prediction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1