The Mennonite case for counter-sovereignty through Indigenous assimilation: Settler colonialism, self-determination and relation to place in religious identity

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION STUDIES IN RELIGION-SCIENCES RELIGIEUSES Pub Date : 2023-05-23 DOI:10.1177/00084298231165443
Joseph Wiebe, Sydney Thackeray
{"title":"The Mennonite case for counter-sovereignty through Indigenous assimilation: Settler colonialism, self-determination and relation to place in religious identity","authors":"Joseph Wiebe, Sydney Thackeray","doi":"10.1177/00084298231165443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay analyses settler colonialism’s impact on religious settler identity through one community’s perceptions and interactions with Indigenous peoples. It combines a normative commitment to Indigenous self-determination with an empirical study of Mennonite settlement narratives by drawing on Indigenous sources to interpret Mennonite descriptions of Indigenous communities between 1880 and 1939. Specifically, using two central characteristics of Indigenous religion and politics to frame the analysis – relationality and self-determination – reveals how Mennonites narrated Indigenous presence to establish their own self-determination. The study identifies the evaluative categories that Mennonites used to narrate Indigenous communities and then uses those categories with a focus on relationality and self-determination to assess North American Mennonite religious history in the same period. It demonstrates how Mennonites’ arguments for Indigenous peoples’ assimilation to settler society were motivated not just by Christian conviction but also by their desire to secure their own sovereignty. Mennonites’ interest in assimilation has at least as much to do with their relation to place as it does with their religious claims.","PeriodicalId":43595,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN RELIGION-SCIENCES RELIGIEUSES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN RELIGION-SCIENCES RELIGIEUSES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00084298231165443","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay analyses settler colonialism’s impact on religious settler identity through one community’s perceptions and interactions with Indigenous peoples. It combines a normative commitment to Indigenous self-determination with an empirical study of Mennonite settlement narratives by drawing on Indigenous sources to interpret Mennonite descriptions of Indigenous communities between 1880 and 1939. Specifically, using two central characteristics of Indigenous religion and politics to frame the analysis – relationality and self-determination – reveals how Mennonites narrated Indigenous presence to establish their own self-determination. The study identifies the evaluative categories that Mennonites used to narrate Indigenous communities and then uses those categories with a focus on relationality and self-determination to assess North American Mennonite religious history in the same period. It demonstrates how Mennonites’ arguments for Indigenous peoples’ assimilation to settler society were motivated not just by Christian conviction but also by their desire to secure their own sovereignty. Mennonites’ interest in assimilation has at least as much to do with their relation to place as it does with their religious claims.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
门诺派通过土著同化反主权的案例:定居者殖民主义、自决和宗教身份与地方的关系
本文通过一个社区对土著民族的认知和互动来分析移民殖民主义对宗教移民身份的影响。它结合了对土著自决的规范承诺和对门诺派定居叙事的实证研究,通过利用土著资源来解释门诺派对1880年至1939年间土著社区的描述。具体地说,使用土著宗教和政治的两个中心特征来构建分析——关系和自决——揭示了门诺派如何叙述土著的存在,以建立自己的自决。这项研究确定了门诺派用来描述土著社区的评估类别,然后用这些类别来评估同一时期北美门诺派的宗教历史,重点是关系和自决。它表明,门诺派教徒主张土著人民融入移民社会,其动机不仅仅是基督教信仰,还有他们确保自己主权的愿望。门诺派教徒对同化的兴趣至少与他们与地方的关系有关,也与他们的宗教主张有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses is a peer-reviewed, bilingual academic quarterly, serving scholars who work in a wide range of sub-fields in religious studies and theological studies. It publishes scholarly articles of interest to specialists, but written so as to be intelligible to other scholars who wish to keep informed of current scholarship. It also features articles that focus, in a timely and critically reflective manner, on intellectual, professional and institutional issues in the scholarly study of religion, as well as notices that inform scholars of activities and developments in religious studies and theological studies across Canada and throughout the world.
期刊最新文献
The otherwise and grace: Exploring theopolitical connections. The state, the gods and the imagination; or, David Graeber as a theorist of religion Compte rendu / Book Review: Les violences sexuelles dans l’Église. Retour sur les travaux de la CIASE Compte rendu / Book Review: La fin de la culture religieuse. Chronique d’une disparition annoncée Book Review / Compte rendu: Beyond Doubt: The Secularization of Society
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1