Tunneling: Evidence from Family Business Groups of Pakistan

S. Hussain, N. Safdar
{"title":"Tunneling: Evidence from Family Business Groups of Pakistan","authors":"S. Hussain, N. Safdar","doi":"10.22547/BER/10.2.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates a critical aspect of agency conflict between dispersed minority and majority (controlling) shareholders in firms affiliated with family business groups. Corporate governance literature indicates that majority shareholders can exploit minority shareholders through tunneling the resources for their benefit or they provide insurance through propping to group firms in distress. For years 2009-2013, the study uses a unique hand-picked data set of 290 non-financial (i.e. 177 family business group and 113 stand-alone or non-group) firms listed on Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX). The study finds that majority shareholders expropriate minority shareholders by tunneling (transferring) important resources from low cash-flow rights firms affiliated with family business group. While measuring the sensitivities of firms to the industry earnings shocks, the empirical results reveal that about 15% resources of low cash-flow rights firms are tunneled to high cash-flow rights firms in family business groups. It is also confirmed that equity held by directors representing majority shareholders has negative relationship with earnings of minority shareholders in low cash-flow rights firms affiliated with family business groups. These findings have certain policy implications for governance related regulation development, diverse shareholders and firm management.","PeriodicalId":80398,"journal":{"name":"Akron business and economic review","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Akron business and economic review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22547/BER/10.2.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

This paper investigates a critical aspect of agency conflict between dispersed minority and majority (controlling) shareholders in firms affiliated with family business groups. Corporate governance literature indicates that majority shareholders can exploit minority shareholders through tunneling the resources for their benefit or they provide insurance through propping to group firms in distress. For years 2009-2013, the study uses a unique hand-picked data set of 290 non-financial (i.e. 177 family business group and 113 stand-alone or non-group) firms listed on Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX). The study finds that majority shareholders expropriate minority shareholders by tunneling (transferring) important resources from low cash-flow rights firms affiliated with family business group. While measuring the sensitivities of firms to the industry earnings shocks, the empirical results reveal that about 15% resources of low cash-flow rights firms are tunneled to high cash-flow rights firms in family business groups. It is also confirmed that equity held by directors representing majority shareholders has negative relationship with earnings of minority shareholders in low cash-flow rights firms affiliated with family business groups. These findings have certain policy implications for governance related regulation development, diverse shareholders and firm management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
隧道:来自巴基斯坦家族企业集团的证据
本文研究了家族企业集团下属企业中分散的少数股东与多数股东(控股股东)之间代理冲突的一个重要方面。公司治理文献表明,大股东可以通过挖掘资源来剥削小股东,或者通过支持陷入困境的集团公司来提供保险。2009年至2013年,该研究使用了一套独特的精选数据集,其中包括290家在巴基斯坦证券交易所(PSX)上市的非金融公司(即177家家族企业集团和113家独立或非集团公司)。研究发现,大股东通过从家族企业集团下属低现金流权公司挖隧道(转让)重要资源来侵占小股东。在衡量企业对行业盈余冲击的敏感性时,实证结果显示,在家族企业集团中,约15%的低现金流权公司资源被转移到高现金流权公司。本文还证实,在家族企业集团附属低现金流权公司中,代表大股东的董事所持股权与小股东的收益呈负相关关系。这些发现对治理相关法规的发展、股东多元化和公司管理具有一定的政策意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Managing Equity Investment Risk and Rate of Return Risk in Islamic Banking: A System Thinking Approach Analyzing the role of values, beliefs and attitude in developing sustainable behavioral intentions: empirical evidence from electric power industry Account of a female Pakistani Ph.D. scholar: An Autoethnographic exploration An Empirical Examination of Relative Income Hypothesis: Evidence from Pakistan Making Sense of Sensemaking Process In the Face of Organizational Environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1