Innominate constitutions and power-sharing in Sri Lanka

Sanjayan Rajasingham
{"title":"Innominate constitutions and power-sharing in Sri Lanka","authors":"Sanjayan Rajasingham","doi":"10.1080/24730580.2022.2057107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT If a constitution with a federal label is politically impossible in Sri Lanka, might an innominate constitution be the next-best alternative? This article draws on comparative experience in India, South Africa and Spain to argue in favour of an innominate constitution for Sri Lanka. The experience of these states suggests pathways that can both federalize an innominate constitution and build the constitutional culture necessary for a future, explicitly federal, Sri Lankan constitution.","PeriodicalId":13511,"journal":{"name":"Indian Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2022.2057107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT If a constitution with a federal label is politically impossible in Sri Lanka, might an innominate constitution be the next-best alternative? This article draws on comparative experience in India, South Africa and Spain to argue in favour of an innominate constitution for Sri Lanka. The experience of these states suggests pathways that can both federalize an innominate constitution and build the constitutional culture necessary for a future, explicitly federal, Sri Lankan constitution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯里兰卡的无名宪法和权力分享
如果一部带有联邦标签的宪法在斯里兰卡在政治上是不可能的,那么一部未提名的宪法可能是次佳选择吗?这篇文章借鉴了印度、南非和西班牙的比较经验,以支持斯里兰卡的无记名宪法。这些邦的经验为我们提供了一条道路,既可以使一部没有提名的宪法联邦化,又可以为未来明确的联邦制斯里兰卡宪法建立必要的宪法文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interpreting without bannisters? The abstraction problem afflicting the basic structure doctrine Courts, mining conflicts, and Adivasi rights: a case study from central India (2000–2022) “ Mutated Sumangali Scheme ”: challenges in enforcement of labour laws in spinning mills of Tamil Nadu Protection of stakeholders’ interests in the Indian corporate landscape: examining the “ifs and buts” The maze of interpretation: abortion laws and legal indeterminacy in Indian courts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1