Effect of low-level laser therapy on the time needed for leveling and alignment of mandibular anterior crowding.

Yasmine Khaled Abdel Ghaffar, Fouad A. El Sharaby, I. Negm
{"title":"Effect of low-level laser therapy on the time needed for leveling and alignment of mandibular anterior crowding.","authors":"Yasmine Khaled Abdel Ghaffar, Fouad A. El Sharaby, I. Negm","doi":"10.2319/102721-795.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nTo assess the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on overall leveling and alignment time of mandibular anterior crowding and associated pain after initial archwire placement.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nThirty-two females (18-25 years) with mandibular anterior crowding were randomly allocated into laser and control groups. Eligibility criteria included Angle Class I molar relationship and Little's irregularity index (LII) from 4 to 10 mm. Randomization was accomplished with a computer-generated random list. A 0.014-inch copper-nickel-titanium (Cu-NiTi) wire was inserted immediately after bonding of 0.022-inch Roth brackets followed by 0.016-inch Cu-NiTi, 0.016 × 0.022-inch NiTi then 0.017 × 0.025-inch stainless steel wire after completion of alignment. In-Ga-As laser was applied to the mandibular anterior segment in the laser group on days 3, 7, and 14, then at 1 month followed by every 2 weeks until completion of leveling and alignment. Visual analogue scale questionnaires were completed by each patient over 7 days from initial archwire placement. Digital models were used to monitor changes in the irregularity index. Blinding was applicable for outcome assessors only.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe mean time for leveling and alignment was significantly lower in the laser compared to the control group (68.2 ± 28.7 and 109.5 ± 34.7 days, respectively). The laser group displayed a significantly higher mean alignment improvement percentage as well as lower pain scores compared to the control group.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nWithin the constraints of the current study, LLLT has a potential for acceleration of anterior segment alignment as well as reduction of the pain associated with placement of initial archwires.","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/102721-795.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on overall leveling and alignment time of mandibular anterior crowding and associated pain after initial archwire placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-two females (18-25 years) with mandibular anterior crowding were randomly allocated into laser and control groups. Eligibility criteria included Angle Class I molar relationship and Little's irregularity index (LII) from 4 to 10 mm. Randomization was accomplished with a computer-generated random list. A 0.014-inch copper-nickel-titanium (Cu-NiTi) wire was inserted immediately after bonding of 0.022-inch Roth brackets followed by 0.016-inch Cu-NiTi, 0.016 × 0.022-inch NiTi then 0.017 × 0.025-inch stainless steel wire after completion of alignment. In-Ga-As laser was applied to the mandibular anterior segment in the laser group on days 3, 7, and 14, then at 1 month followed by every 2 weeks until completion of leveling and alignment. Visual analogue scale questionnaires were completed by each patient over 7 days from initial archwire placement. Digital models were used to monitor changes in the irregularity index. Blinding was applicable for outcome assessors only. RESULTS The mean time for leveling and alignment was significantly lower in the laser compared to the control group (68.2 ± 28.7 and 109.5 ± 34.7 days, respectively). The laser group displayed a significantly higher mean alignment improvement percentage as well as lower pain scores compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS Within the constraints of the current study, LLLT has a potential for acceleration of anterior segment alignment as well as reduction of the pain associated with placement of initial archwires.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低水平激光治疗对下颌前牙拥挤矫直时间的影响。
目的探讨低水平激光治疗(LLLT)对下颌前牙拥挤整体水平、对准时间及弓丝置入术后疼痛的影响。材料与方法将32例年龄在18 ~ 25岁的女性下颌前牙拥挤患者随机分为激光组和对照组。合格标准包括角I级磨牙关系和利特氏不规则指数(LII),范围为4 ~ 10 mm。随机化是通过计算机生成的随机列表完成的。在0.022英寸罗斯支架粘合后立即插入0.014英寸的铜镍钛(Cu-NiTi)线,然后在对齐完成后插入0.016英寸的Cu-NiTi, 0.016 × 0.022英寸的NiTi和0.017 × 0.025英寸的不锈钢线。激光组于第3、7、14天对下颌前段进行in - ga - as激光治疗,第1个月后每2周进行一次激光治疗,直至整平和对准完成。每位患者在首次放置弓丝后7天内完成视觉模拟量表问卷。采用数字模型监测不均匀指数的变化。盲法仅适用于结果评估者。结果激光组调平和对准的平均时间(68.2±28.7 d)显著低于对照组(109.5±34.7 d)。与对照组相比,激光组显示出更高的平均对齐改善百分比以及更低的疼痛评分。结论:在当前研究的限制下,LLLT有可能加速前段对齐,并减少与初始弓丝放置相关的疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Three-dimensional assessment of the nasopharyngeal airway in Down syndrome during the mixed dentition period: a case-control study. Strategic treatment for a patient with missing lateral incisor and first molar accompanied by posterior scissor bite and an impacted premolar. Evaluation of dentoalveolar changes following maxillary incisor intrusion with one vs two anterior miniscrews in subjects with gummy smile: a randomized clinical trial. The OHStat guidelines for reporting observational studies and clinical trials in oral health research: manuscript checklist. A skeletal Class III young adult with severe maxillary transverse deficiency treated with maxillary skeletal expander.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1