Designing policy instruments for regional floodplain management in Austria: the role of effectiveness and legitimacy

IF 2.9 3区 社会学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning Pub Date : 2022-03-16 DOI:10.1080/1523908X.2022.2051453
R. Nordbeck, L. Löschner, W. Seher
{"title":"Designing policy instruments for regional floodplain management in Austria: the role of effectiveness and legitimacy","authors":"R. Nordbeck, L. Löschner, W. Seher","doi":"10.1080/1523908X.2022.2051453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n This article explores the issue of regional floodplain management in Austria from a policy design perspective. Austria has experienced a series of major floods in recent years. In response to these flood events a range of policy instruments at the land–water nexus were developed. Three policy instruments were selected as case studies to represent this policy shift toward integrated flood risk management: (a) regulatory spatial planning, (b) water associations and (c) financial compensation schemes for flood storage. The main objective of our article is to build a better understanding of the interlinkage of effectiveness and legitimacy in the process of policy formulation. The analysis draws on a review of policy documents and expert interviews with core decision-makers. Our analysis shows that the main challenge in the selection process is not the issue of effectiveness, but rather the acceptance of the policy instrument by target groups. Stakeholder participation increases the legitimacy of the instrument design and minimizes conflicts in the following implementation, thereby increasing the effectiveness of the policy instrument. In contrast to the assumptions prevailing in the current policy design literature, our empirical analysis does not support the common preposition that participatory processes result in inferior forms of policy design.","PeriodicalId":15699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","volume":"64 1","pages":"749 - 761"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2022.2051453","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article explores the issue of regional floodplain management in Austria from a policy design perspective. Austria has experienced a series of major floods in recent years. In response to these flood events a range of policy instruments at the land–water nexus were developed. Three policy instruments were selected as case studies to represent this policy shift toward integrated flood risk management: (a) regulatory spatial planning, (b) water associations and (c) financial compensation schemes for flood storage. The main objective of our article is to build a better understanding of the interlinkage of effectiveness and legitimacy in the process of policy formulation. The analysis draws on a review of policy documents and expert interviews with core decision-makers. Our analysis shows that the main challenge in the selection process is not the issue of effectiveness, but rather the acceptance of the policy instrument by target groups. Stakeholder participation increases the legitimacy of the instrument design and minimizes conflicts in the following implementation, thereby increasing the effectiveness of the policy instrument. In contrast to the assumptions prevailing in the current policy design literature, our empirical analysis does not support the common preposition that participatory processes result in inferior forms of policy design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设计奥地利区域洪泛平原管理的政策工具:有效性和合法性的作用
摘要:本文从政策设计的角度探讨奥地利区域洪泛区管理问题。奥地利近年来经历了一系列的大洪水。为了应对这些洪水事件,在陆地-水关系方面制定了一系列政策工具。本文选择了三种政策工具作为案例研究,以代表这种向综合洪水风险管理的政策转变:(a)规范性空间规划,(b)水资源协会和(c)储洪财政补偿方案。本文的主要目的是更好地理解政策制定过程中有效性和合法性的相互联系。该分析基于对政策文件的审查和对核心决策者的专家访谈。我们的分析表明,选择过程中的主要挑战不是有效性问题,而是目标群体对政策工具的接受程度。利益相关者的参与增加了工具设计的合法性,并最大限度地减少了后续实施中的冲突,从而提高了政策工具的有效性。与当前政策设计文献中普遍存在的假设相反,我们的实证分析并不支持参与性过程导致劣质政策设计的常见介词。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
Chiefs and floods: hybrid governance and co-production of flood risk adaptation in Tamale, Ghana. City-to-city learning: a synthesis and research agenda The nested hierarchy of urban vulnerability within land use policies fails to address climate injustices in Turkey Does multidimensional distance matter? Perceptions and acceptance of wind power Exploring the potential of city networks for climate: the case of urbact
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1