Artificial Intelligence Model for Predicting Formation Damage in Oil and Gas Wells

Augustine James Effiong, Joseph O. Etim, Anietie Ndarake Okon
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence Model for Predicting Formation Damage in Oil and Gas Wells","authors":"Augustine James Effiong, Joseph O. Etim, Anietie Ndarake Okon","doi":"10.2118/207129-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n An artificial neural network (ANN) was developed to predict skin, a formation damage parameter in oil and gas drilling, well completion and production operations. Four performance metrics: goodness of fit (R2), mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), average absolute percentage relative error (AAPRE), was used to check the performance of the developed model. The results obtained indicate that the model had an overall MSE of 355.343, RMSE of 18.850, AAPRE of 4.090 and an R2 of 0.9978. All the predictions agreed with the measured result. The generalization capacity of the developed ANN model was assessed using 500 randomly generated datasets that were not part of the model training process. The results obtained indicate that the developed model predicted 97% of these new datasets with an MSE of 375.021, RMSE of 19.370, AAPRE of 6.090 and R2 of 0.9731, while Standing (1970) equation resulted in R2of −0.807, MSE of 9.34×1016, AAPRE of 3.10×106 and RMSE of 4.10×105. The relative importance analysis of the model input parameters showed that the flow rates (q), permeability (k), porosity (φ) and pressure drop (Δp) had a significant impact on the skin (S) values estimated from the downhole. Thus, the developed model if embedded in a downhole (sensing) tool that capture these basic or required reservoir parameters: pressure, flowrate, permeability, viscosity, and thickness, would eliminate the diagnostic approach of estimating skin factor in the petroleum industry.","PeriodicalId":10899,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, August 03, 2021","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, August 03, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/207129-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An artificial neural network (ANN) was developed to predict skin, a formation damage parameter in oil and gas drilling, well completion and production operations. Four performance metrics: goodness of fit (R2), mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), average absolute percentage relative error (AAPRE), was used to check the performance of the developed model. The results obtained indicate that the model had an overall MSE of 355.343, RMSE of 18.850, AAPRE of 4.090 and an R2 of 0.9978. All the predictions agreed with the measured result. The generalization capacity of the developed ANN model was assessed using 500 randomly generated datasets that were not part of the model training process. The results obtained indicate that the developed model predicted 97% of these new datasets with an MSE of 375.021, RMSE of 19.370, AAPRE of 6.090 and R2 of 0.9731, while Standing (1970) equation resulted in R2of −0.807, MSE of 9.34×1016, AAPRE of 3.10×106 and RMSE of 4.10×105. The relative importance analysis of the model input parameters showed that the flow rates (q), permeability (k), porosity (φ) and pressure drop (Δp) had a significant impact on the skin (S) values estimated from the downhole. Thus, the developed model if embedded in a downhole (sensing) tool that capture these basic or required reservoir parameters: pressure, flowrate, permeability, viscosity, and thickness, would eliminate the diagnostic approach of estimating skin factor in the petroleum industry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
油气井地层损害预测的人工智能模型
提出了一种人工神经网络(ANN),用于预测油气钻井、完井和生产作业中的地层损伤参数表皮。采用拟合优度(R2)、均方误差(MSE)、均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对百分比相对误差(AAPRE)四个性能指标来检验模型的性能。结果表明,该模型的总体MSE为355.343,RMSE为18.850,AAPRE为4.090,R2为0.9978。所有的预测都与实测结果相符。开发的人工神经网络模型的泛化能力使用500个随机生成的数据集进行评估,这些数据集不是模型训练过程的一部分。结果表明,该模型对新数据集的预测率为97%,MSE为375.021,RMSE为19.370,AAPRE为6.090,R2为0.9731,而Standing(1970)方程的预测结果为R2为- 0.807,MSE为9.34×1016, AAPRE为3.10×106, RMSE为4.10×105。模型输入参数的相对重要性分析表明,流量(q)、渗透率(k)、孔隙度(φ)和压降(Δp)对井下估算的表皮值(S)有显著影响。因此,如果将开发的模型嵌入到井下(传感)工具中,该工具可以捕获这些基本或必需的油藏参数:压力、流量、渗透率、粘度和厚度,将消除石油工业中估计表皮系数的诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Production and Performance Evaluation of Biodetergents as an Alternative to Conventional Drilling Detergent Comparative Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Models for Drilling Rate of Penetration Prediction The Limitation of Reservoir Saturation Logging Tool in a Case of a Deeper Reservoir Flow into a Shallower Reservoir Within the Same Wellbore Surrogate-Based Analysis of Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery – A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Model Performance Understanding the Impacts of Backpressure & Risk Analysis of Different Gas Hydrate Blockage Scenarios on the Integrity of Subsea Flowlines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1