Louis C. Grandizio, Lisa J. Choe, Lisa Follett, Andrew J. Laychur, Amanda J. Young
{"title":"The impact of self-efficacy on nonoperative treatment of atraumatic shoulder pain","authors":"Louis C. Grandizio, Lisa J. Choe, Lisa Follett, Andrew J. Laychur, Amanda J. Young","doi":"10.1515/jom-2021-0132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Context Atraumatic shoulder pain is frequently encountered in primary care and surgical clinics. With increased recognition of the biopsychosocial model, there has been an increased emphasis on identifying patient factors associated with less effective coping strategies such as pain catastrophizing. It remains uncertain what impact self-efficacy has on the response to nonoperative treatment of shoulder pain. Objectives Our purpose is to determine the influence of patient coping strategies (self-efficacy) on the outcome of nonoperative treatment of atraumatic shoulder pain. We hypothesize that higher levels of self-efficacy are associated with increased self-reported function after nonoperative treatment. Methods We conducted a retrospective case-control study for a consecutive series of patients seen in our clinic with nonoperatively managed atraumatic shoulder pain. Baseline demographics and range of motion were recorded. Patients completed the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), PROMIS Pain Interference (PI), and PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Symptoms (SE). After 3 months of nonoperative treatment, patients were placed into two groups: patients who clinically improved (Group 1) and those that did not (Group 2), with clinical improvement defined as an increase of 2 or greater on the SST. Results Seventy-eight patients returned for follow-up and completed all questionnaires. There were no statistically significant differences for age, sex, or tobacco use between the two groups. Half of the patients in our series had symptoms for >12 months, with rotator cuff syndrome being the most frequent diagnosis (40.0%). Patients in Group 1 had significantly higher PROMIS SE scores (42 vs. 39, p=0.0094) at initial evaluation. At 3-month follow-up, patients in Group 1 also had significantly lower Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) scores (4.5 vs. 6.5, p=0.0067), compared to Group 2. Conclusions Patients who experience clinical improvement with nonoperative treatment of atraumatic shoulder conditions demonstrate higher self-efficacy than patients who fail to improve. Guiding patients with atraumatic shoulder pain and low self-efficacy toward interventions aimed at improving coping strategies, rather than addressing musculoskeletal factors alone, may contribute to the goal of improving outcomes.","PeriodicalId":16639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":"297 - 302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2021-0132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Context Atraumatic shoulder pain is frequently encountered in primary care and surgical clinics. With increased recognition of the biopsychosocial model, there has been an increased emphasis on identifying patient factors associated with less effective coping strategies such as pain catastrophizing. It remains uncertain what impact self-efficacy has on the response to nonoperative treatment of shoulder pain. Objectives Our purpose is to determine the influence of patient coping strategies (self-efficacy) on the outcome of nonoperative treatment of atraumatic shoulder pain. We hypothesize that higher levels of self-efficacy are associated with increased self-reported function after nonoperative treatment. Methods We conducted a retrospective case-control study for a consecutive series of patients seen in our clinic with nonoperatively managed atraumatic shoulder pain. Baseline demographics and range of motion were recorded. Patients completed the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), PROMIS Pain Interference (PI), and PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Symptoms (SE). After 3 months of nonoperative treatment, patients were placed into two groups: patients who clinically improved (Group 1) and those that did not (Group 2), with clinical improvement defined as an increase of 2 or greater on the SST. Results Seventy-eight patients returned for follow-up and completed all questionnaires. There were no statistically significant differences for age, sex, or tobacco use between the two groups. Half of the patients in our series had symptoms for >12 months, with rotator cuff syndrome being the most frequent diagnosis (40.0%). Patients in Group 1 had significantly higher PROMIS SE scores (42 vs. 39, p=0.0094) at initial evaluation. At 3-month follow-up, patients in Group 1 also had significantly lower Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) scores (4.5 vs. 6.5, p=0.0067), compared to Group 2. Conclusions Patients who experience clinical improvement with nonoperative treatment of atraumatic shoulder conditions demonstrate higher self-efficacy than patients who fail to improve. Guiding patients with atraumatic shoulder pain and low self-efficacy toward interventions aimed at improving coping strategies, rather than addressing musculoskeletal factors alone, may contribute to the goal of improving outcomes.
摘要背景非外伤性肩痛在初级保健和外科诊所中经常遇到。随着对生物心理社会模型认识的增加,人们越来越重视识别与疼痛灾难化等不太有效的应对策略相关的患者因素。目前尚不清楚自我效能感对非手术治疗肩痛的反应有何影响。目的探讨患者应对策略(自我效能感)对非外伤性肩痛非手术治疗效果的影响。我们假设较高水平的自我效能与非手术治疗后自我报告的功能增加有关。方法:我们对在我院就诊的非手术治疗的非外伤性肩痛患者进行了回顾性病例对照研究。记录基线人口统计数据和活动范围。患者完成了简单肩部测试(SST)、PROMIS疼痛干扰测试(PI)和PROMIS症状管理自我效能测试(SE)。非手术治疗3个月后,将患者分为两组:临床改善的患者(1组)和未改善的患者(2组),临床改善定义为SST增加2或更多。结果78例患者回访并完成问卷调查。两组在年龄、性别或吸烟方面没有统计学上的显著差异。在我们的研究中,有一半的患者症状持续了12个月以上,其中最常见的诊断是肩袖综合征(40.0%)。第1组患者在初始评估时的PROMIS SE评分明显更高(42比39,p=0.0094)。在3个月的随访中,与2组相比,1组患者的数字疼痛评定量表(NPRS)评分也显著降低(4.5 vs. 6.5, p=0.0067)。结论非外伤性肩周炎非手术治疗后临床改善的患者自我效能感高于未改善的患者。引导非外伤性肩痛和低自我效能的患者采取旨在改善应对策略的干预措施,而不是单独解决肌肉骨骼因素,可能有助于改善预后的目标。