When Socialization Goes Wrong: Understanding the We-Intention to Participate in Collective Trolling in Virtual Communities

IF 7 3区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of the Association for Information Systems Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17705/1JAIS.00737
Yangjun Li, Christy M. K. Cheung, Xiao-Liang Shen, Matthew K. O. Lee
{"title":"When Socialization Goes Wrong: Understanding the We-Intention to Participate in Collective Trolling in Virtual Communities","authors":"Yangjun Li, Christy M. K. Cheung, Xiao-Liang Shen, Matthew K. O. Lee","doi":"10.17705/1JAIS.00737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although collective trolling poses a growing threat to both individuals and virtual community owners, the information systems (IS) literature lacks a rich theorization of this phenomenon. To address the research gaps, we introduce the concept of we-intention to capture the collective nature of collective trolling in virtual communities. We also integrate the social identity model of deindividuation effects (SIDE) and situational action theory to invoke the sociotechnical perspective in theorizing collective trolling in virtual communities. The objective of this study is to use the sociotechnical perspective to understand the we-intention to participate in collective trolling in virtual communities. We test our proposed model using data gathered from 377 Reddit users. Our moderated mediation analysis elaborates how technical elements (i.e., anonymity of self and anonymity of others) influence the we-intention to participate in collective trolling via individual-based social elements (i.e., perceived online disinhibition and social identity), with an environment-based social element (i.e., the absence of capable guardianship) as a boundary condition. We contribute to research by explaining collective trolling in virtual communities from the group-referent intentional action perspective and sociotechnical perspective. We also offer practical insights into ways to combat collective trolling in virtual communities.","PeriodicalId":51101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Association for Information Systems","volume":"2072 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Association for Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17705/1JAIS.00737","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Although collective trolling poses a growing threat to both individuals and virtual community owners, the information systems (IS) literature lacks a rich theorization of this phenomenon. To address the research gaps, we introduce the concept of we-intention to capture the collective nature of collective trolling in virtual communities. We also integrate the social identity model of deindividuation effects (SIDE) and situational action theory to invoke the sociotechnical perspective in theorizing collective trolling in virtual communities. The objective of this study is to use the sociotechnical perspective to understand the we-intention to participate in collective trolling in virtual communities. We test our proposed model using data gathered from 377 Reddit users. Our moderated mediation analysis elaborates how technical elements (i.e., anonymity of self and anonymity of others) influence the we-intention to participate in collective trolling via individual-based social elements (i.e., perceived online disinhibition and social identity), with an environment-based social element (i.e., the absence of capable guardianship) as a boundary condition. We contribute to research by explaining collective trolling in virtual communities from the group-referent intentional action perspective and sociotechnical perspective. We also offer practical insights into ways to combat collective trolling in virtual communities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当社会化出了问题:理解我们——参与虚拟社区集体挑衅的意图
尽管集体网络喷子对个人和虚拟社区所有者构成了越来越大的威胁,但信息系统(IS)文献缺乏对这一现象的丰富理论。为了解决研究空白,我们引入了“我们意图”的概念,以捕捉虚拟社区中集体钓鱼的集体性质。我们还整合了去个性化效应的社会身份模型(SIDE)和情境行动理论,以调用社会技术视角来理论化虚拟社区中的集体钓鱼行为。本研究的目的是利用社会技术的视角来理解我们在虚拟社区中参与集体喷子的意图。我们使用从377名Reddit用户收集的数据来测试我们提出的模型。我们的适度中介分析阐述了技术因素(即自我匿名和他人匿名)如何通过基于个人的社会因素(即感知到的在线解除抑制和社会身份)影响我们参与集体钓鱼的意图,以基于环境的社会因素(即缺乏有能力的监护)作为边界条件。我们通过从群体所指的故意行为角度和社会技术角度解释虚拟社区中的集体钓鱼行为来促进研究。我们还提供了实际的见解,如何打击集体喷子在虚拟社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Journal of the Association for Information Systems 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
5.20%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS), the flagship journal of the Association for Information Systems, publishes the highest quality scholarship in the field of information systems. It is inclusive in topics, level and unit of analysis, theory, method and philosophical and research approach, reflecting all aspects of Information Systems globally. The Journal promotes innovative, interesting and rigorously developed conceptual and empirical contributions and encourages theory based multi- or inter-disciplinary research.
期刊最新文献
"My Precious!": A Values-Affordances Perspective on the Adoption of Bitcoin A Warning Approach to Mitigating Bandwagon Bias in Online Ratings: Theoretical Analysis and Experimental Investigations Social Inclusion: The Use of Social Media and the Impact on First-Generation College Students Positively Fearful: Activating the Individual's HERO Within to Explain Volitional Security Technology Adoption The Effectiveness of Highlighting Different Communication Orientations in Promoting Mobile Communication Technology at Work vs. at Home: Evidence from a Field Experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1