Epithelial-mesenchymal transition: the history of the concept, debatable issues

N. Shevlyuk
{"title":"Epithelial-mesenchymal transition: the history of the concept, debatable issues","authors":"N. Shevlyuk","doi":"10.18499/2225-7357-2023-12-2-90-98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"   The paper discusses diverse aspects of the concept of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and compares the basics of this concept with the classical concepts of tissue biology. The idea of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition was first suggested by Elizabeth Hay (1927–2007) in 1968 based on the analysis of tridermogenesis in the development and growth of the avian embryo. In the late 80s – early 90s of the twentieth century, the concept of epithelial–mesenchymal transition won supporters-pathomorphologists in our country who applied the concept to explain mechanisms of multiple pathological processes. The controversial issue arises: to which extent the concept of epithelial-mesenchymal transition is validated. It should be noted that a number of its basic principles are open to question. Thus, it is hardly correct to consider the cells of the ectoderma as epithelial cells, since they do not express immunohistochemical markers of epithelial tissue cells. That is, cells with a true epithelial phenotype are not yet represented at this stage of embryogenesis. It should also be taken into account that all evidence for the epithelial-mesenchymal transition is based on indirect immunocytochemical findings (decreased expression of epithelial markers, increased expression of markers of mesenchymal tissue genesis). Moreover, saying about the “epithelial-mesenchymal transition” specialists mean cell populations and not specific cells, which is hardly the same. All the above allows arguing the existence of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition; this issue needs additional research and more fact-based support.","PeriodicalId":15028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology","volume":"2014 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18499/2225-7357-2023-12-2-90-98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

   The paper discusses diverse aspects of the concept of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and compares the basics of this concept with the classical concepts of tissue biology. The idea of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition was first suggested by Elizabeth Hay (1927–2007) in 1968 based on the analysis of tridermogenesis in the development and growth of the avian embryo. In the late 80s – early 90s of the twentieth century, the concept of epithelial–mesenchymal transition won supporters-pathomorphologists in our country who applied the concept to explain mechanisms of multiple pathological processes. The controversial issue arises: to which extent the concept of epithelial-mesenchymal transition is validated. It should be noted that a number of its basic principles are open to question. Thus, it is hardly correct to consider the cells of the ectoderma as epithelial cells, since they do not express immunohistochemical markers of epithelial tissue cells. That is, cells with a true epithelial phenotype are not yet represented at this stage of embryogenesis. It should also be taken into account that all evidence for the epithelial-mesenchymal transition is based on indirect immunocytochemical findings (decreased expression of epithelial markers, increased expression of markers of mesenchymal tissue genesis). Moreover, saying about the “epithelial-mesenchymal transition” specialists mean cell populations and not specific cells, which is hardly the same. All the above allows arguing the existence of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition; this issue needs additional research and more fact-based support.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上皮-间质转化:概念的历史,有争议的问题
本文讨论了上皮-间质转化概念的各个方面,并将这一概念的基础与组织生物学的经典概念进行了比较。1968年,Elizabeth Hay(1927-2007)在分析禽类胚胎发育和生长过程中的三胚发生过程的基础上,首次提出了上皮-间质转化的观点。20世纪80年代末- 90年代初,上皮-间质转化的概念在我国得到了病理形态学家的支持,他们将这一概念应用于解释多种病理过程的机制。有争议的问题出现了:上皮-间质转化的概念在多大程度上是有效的。应当指出,它的一些基本原则是有问题的。因此,将外胚层细胞视为上皮细胞几乎是不正确的,因为它们不表达上皮组织细胞的免疫组织化学标记。也就是说,具有真正上皮表型的细胞在胚胎发生的这个阶段还没有表现出来。还应考虑到,上皮-间质转化的所有证据都是基于间接的免疫细胞化学发现(上皮标记物表达减少,间质组织发生标记物表达增加)。此外,专家所说的“上皮-间质转化”指的是细胞群,而不是特定的细胞,这几乎是不一样的。所有这些都证明了上皮-间质转化的存在;这个问题需要进一步的研究和更多基于事实的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effect of microgravity on mast cells as a multifunctional element of the immune system “Child's Anatomy” – a new discipline in the structure of the basic professional educational program of higher education of the degree in “Pediatrics” Fundamentals, biological, medical and social aspects of assisted reproductive technologies: history of creation, current state, prospects Immunohistochemical analysis of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1 expression in the myocardium of rats in the early postnatal period on preterm birth modeling Contemporary data on the structural and functional organization of the insular lobe of cerebral hemispheres
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1