Comparative evaluation of the effect of endodontic access and subsequent restorations on crown retention: A narrative review of an in vitro study

Q3 Dentistry Saudi Endodontic Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/sej.sej_74_22
R. Mahmoud, Arruh Almolhem, Sawsan Alomari, Rahaf Babader, Faisal Alghamdi
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of the effect of endodontic access and subsequent restorations on crown retention: A narrative review of an in vitro study","authors":"R. Mahmoud, Arruh Almolhem, Sawsan Alomari, Rahaf Babader, Faisal Alghamdi","doi":"10.4103/sej.sej_74_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies suggest that endodontic access cavity (EAC) can decrease the retention of crowns. However, there is no clear evidence that restoring EAC effects on crown retention. Thus, the main objective of this narrative review is to assess several materials applied for restoring EAC to different crowns in anterior or posterior teeth, as well as the effect of each material on crown retention. An electronic search for studies published until December 31, 2021, was conducted using the four databases: Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Researchers selected in vitro studies that investigated the crown retention before and after resorting EAC of anterior or posterior teeth. Exclusively, in vitro studies were considered for assessment. Five papers were selected for the final analysis from the 126 identified during the initial search. Our outcomes illustrated that no significant differences in outcomes between the restorative materials after the endodontic treatment. The findings of this narrative review suggest that crown retention can increase after restoring endodontic access cavities. Finally, the available data indicated that restoring EAC could increase the crown retention more than the original crown. Nevertheless, the prefabricated crown resistance could be more affected by the type of restorative material used inside the EAC following endodontic treatment than retention. Additional clinical and radiological measures are needed.","PeriodicalId":21485,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Endodontic Journal","volume":"76 1","pages":"22 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_74_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies suggest that endodontic access cavity (EAC) can decrease the retention of crowns. However, there is no clear evidence that restoring EAC effects on crown retention. Thus, the main objective of this narrative review is to assess several materials applied for restoring EAC to different crowns in anterior or posterior teeth, as well as the effect of each material on crown retention. An electronic search for studies published until December 31, 2021, was conducted using the four databases: Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Researchers selected in vitro studies that investigated the crown retention before and after resorting EAC of anterior or posterior teeth. Exclusively, in vitro studies were considered for assessment. Five papers were selected for the final analysis from the 126 identified during the initial search. Our outcomes illustrated that no significant differences in outcomes between the restorative materials after the endodontic treatment. The findings of this narrative review suggest that crown retention can increase after restoring endodontic access cavities. Finally, the available data indicated that restoring EAC could increase the crown retention more than the original crown. Nevertheless, the prefabricated crown resistance could be more affected by the type of restorative material used inside the EAC following endodontic treatment than retention. Additional clinical and radiological measures are needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根管通路和后续修复对冠固位影响的比较评价:一项体外研究的叙述性回顾
研究表明,根管通道(EAC)可以减少冠的固位。然而,没有明确的证据表明恢复EAC对冠固位的影响。因此,本文的主要目的是评估几种用于前牙或后牙不同冠上EAC修复的材料,以及每种材料对冠固位的影响。对2021年12月31日之前发表的研究进行电子搜索,使用四个数据库:Scopus、PubMed、Web of Science和Google Scholar。研究人员选择了体外研究,研究了前牙或后牙进行EAC前后的冠固位。专门考虑体外研究进行评估。在最初的搜索中,从126篇论文中选择了5篇论文进行最终分析。我们的结果表明,不同的修复材料在根管治疗后的结果没有显著差异。本文的研究结果表明,修复根管通道腔后,冠固位可以增加。结果表明,修复EAC后,冠固位增加的幅度大于原冠。尽管如此,根管治疗后EAC内使用的修复材料类型可能比保留更能影响预制冠的阻力。需要额外的临床和放射学措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Saudi Endodontic Journal
Saudi Endodontic Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Vision SEJ aims to be one of the foremost worldwide periodical on Endodontics, dedicated to the promotion of research, post-graduate training and further education in Endodontics. Mission Statement To serve as a medium for continued Endodontic education and qualitative scientific publications on clinical trials, basic science related to the biological aspects of Endodontics, basic science related to Endodontic techniques as well as dental trauma that will ultimately improve the Endodontic research and patient’s health. Scope In this journal, Endodontists, Endodontic postgraduate students and general dentists, can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation that help them keep pace with rapid changes in this field. Aims and Objectives To publish cut edge peer-review original articles, case reports, letters to the editor, editorials, review articles, commentaries, and innovations that will impact on Endodontics. To enhance exchange of ideas/information relating to Endodontics and interaction among stakeholders. To encourage networking and partnership between individuals, government and non-governmental organizations for the provision of quality health care. To advocate for training, workshops, seminars, scientific manuscript writing conferences that will advance publishing culture.
期刊最新文献
Stepwise caries intervention: An approach precursive to endodontic intervention – A case series Adoption of rotary instrumentation among general practitioners in Qassim region, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional survey Endodontic retreatment of a mesotaurodontic mandibular first molar with C-shaped configuration in a patient with multiple taurodonts: A case report and review of literature Irrigating or irritating – A letter to the editor The prevalence and causes of wrong tooth root canal treatment in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1