R. Mahmoud, Arruh Almolhem, Sawsan Alomari, Rahaf Babader, Faisal Alghamdi
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of the effect of endodontic access and subsequent restorations on crown retention: A narrative review of an in vitro study","authors":"R. Mahmoud, Arruh Almolhem, Sawsan Alomari, Rahaf Babader, Faisal Alghamdi","doi":"10.4103/sej.sej_74_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies suggest that endodontic access cavity (EAC) can decrease the retention of crowns. However, there is no clear evidence that restoring EAC effects on crown retention. Thus, the main objective of this narrative review is to assess several materials applied for restoring EAC to different crowns in anterior or posterior teeth, as well as the effect of each material on crown retention. An electronic search for studies published until December 31, 2021, was conducted using the four databases: Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Researchers selected in vitro studies that investigated the crown retention before and after resorting EAC of anterior or posterior teeth. Exclusively, in vitro studies were considered for assessment. Five papers were selected for the final analysis from the 126 identified during the initial search. Our outcomes illustrated that no significant differences in outcomes between the restorative materials after the endodontic treatment. The findings of this narrative review suggest that crown retention can increase after restoring endodontic access cavities. Finally, the available data indicated that restoring EAC could increase the crown retention more than the original crown. Nevertheless, the prefabricated crown resistance could be more affected by the type of restorative material used inside the EAC following endodontic treatment than retention. Additional clinical and radiological measures are needed.","PeriodicalId":21485,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Endodontic Journal","volume":"76 1","pages":"22 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_74_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Studies suggest that endodontic access cavity (EAC) can decrease the retention of crowns. However, there is no clear evidence that restoring EAC effects on crown retention. Thus, the main objective of this narrative review is to assess several materials applied for restoring EAC to different crowns in anterior or posterior teeth, as well as the effect of each material on crown retention. An electronic search for studies published until December 31, 2021, was conducted using the four databases: Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Researchers selected in vitro studies that investigated the crown retention before and after resorting EAC of anterior or posterior teeth. Exclusively, in vitro studies were considered for assessment. Five papers were selected for the final analysis from the 126 identified during the initial search. Our outcomes illustrated that no significant differences in outcomes between the restorative materials after the endodontic treatment. The findings of this narrative review suggest that crown retention can increase after restoring endodontic access cavities. Finally, the available data indicated that restoring EAC could increase the crown retention more than the original crown. Nevertheless, the prefabricated crown resistance could be more affected by the type of restorative material used inside the EAC following endodontic treatment than retention. Additional clinical and radiological measures are needed.
研究表明,根管通道(EAC)可以减少冠的固位。然而,没有明确的证据表明恢复EAC对冠固位的影响。因此,本文的主要目的是评估几种用于前牙或后牙不同冠上EAC修复的材料,以及每种材料对冠固位的影响。对2021年12月31日之前发表的研究进行电子搜索,使用四个数据库:Scopus、PubMed、Web of Science和Google Scholar。研究人员选择了体外研究,研究了前牙或后牙进行EAC前后的冠固位。专门考虑体外研究进行评估。在最初的搜索中,从126篇论文中选择了5篇论文进行最终分析。我们的结果表明,不同的修复材料在根管治疗后的结果没有显著差异。本文的研究结果表明,修复根管通道腔后,冠固位可以增加。结果表明,修复EAC后,冠固位增加的幅度大于原冠。尽管如此,根管治疗后EAC内使用的修复材料类型可能比保留更能影响预制冠的阻力。需要额外的临床和放射学措施。
期刊介绍:
Vision SEJ aims to be one of the foremost worldwide periodical on Endodontics, dedicated to the promotion of research, post-graduate training and further education in Endodontics. Mission Statement To serve as a medium for continued Endodontic education and qualitative scientific publications on clinical trials, basic science related to the biological aspects of Endodontics, basic science related to Endodontic techniques as well as dental trauma that will ultimately improve the Endodontic research and patient’s health. Scope In this journal, Endodontists, Endodontic postgraduate students and general dentists, can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation that help them keep pace with rapid changes in this field. Aims and Objectives To publish cut edge peer-review original articles, case reports, letters to the editor, editorials, review articles, commentaries, and innovations that will impact on Endodontics. To enhance exchange of ideas/information relating to Endodontics and interaction among stakeholders. To encourage networking and partnership between individuals, government and non-governmental organizations for the provision of quality health care. To advocate for training, workshops, seminars, scientific manuscript writing conferences that will advance publishing culture.