V. Dhyani, Jisha B. Krishnan, E. Mathias, M. Hossain, Carrie Price, Nachiket Gudi, S. Pattanshetty, S. Zodpey
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators for the adoption of telemedicine services in low-income and middle-income countries: a rapid overview of reviews","authors":"V. Dhyani, Jisha B. Krishnan, E. Mathias, M. Hossain, Carrie Price, Nachiket Gudi, S. Pattanshetty, S. Zodpey","doi":"10.1136/bmjinnov-2022-001062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To identify the barriers and facilitators for uptake of telemedicine services in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Design The rapid review approach to identify the barriers and facilitators for the uptake/delivery of telemedicine in health system from both the provider and the patient’s perspective. A two-stage sequential screening process was adopted. Data extraction was done using a piloted data extraction form. Data sources A search on PubMed (NCBI), Embase (Ovid), the Cochrane Library (Wiley), Scopus (Elsevier) and the WHO Global Index Medicus was conducted. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Studies published between 1 January 2012 and 1 July 2022 on barriers and facilitators for uptake of telemedicine services in LMICs were included. Results Database search identified a total of 2829 citations. After removing 1069 duplicates, 1760 were taken forward for title and abstract screening. A total of 43 articles were included at full text stage and 8 articles were included in this overview for narrative synthesis. Barriers and facilitators to telemedicine adoption and use were categorised under four subheadings, namely organisational and environmental, individual and cultural barriers, financial barriers and technological barriers. Providers, patient and health policy-makers perspectives were captured. Conclusion Any development of telemedicine services should engage the primary users such as patients and their family caregivers to design people-centred digital health systems and services. Usability studies must be commissioned by the governments and host agencies to enhance the interaction experience pending which investments would remain futile. Future research should employ mixed methods or multi methods approaches to understand the interaction between patients and providers.","PeriodicalId":53454,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Innovations","volume":"76 1","pages":"215 - 225"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2022-001062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective To identify the barriers and facilitators for uptake of telemedicine services in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Design The rapid review approach to identify the barriers and facilitators for the uptake/delivery of telemedicine in health system from both the provider and the patient’s perspective. A two-stage sequential screening process was adopted. Data extraction was done using a piloted data extraction form. Data sources A search on PubMed (NCBI), Embase (Ovid), the Cochrane Library (Wiley), Scopus (Elsevier) and the WHO Global Index Medicus was conducted. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Studies published between 1 January 2012 and 1 July 2022 on barriers and facilitators for uptake of telemedicine services in LMICs were included. Results Database search identified a total of 2829 citations. After removing 1069 duplicates, 1760 were taken forward for title and abstract screening. A total of 43 articles were included at full text stage and 8 articles were included in this overview for narrative synthesis. Barriers and facilitators to telemedicine adoption and use were categorised under four subheadings, namely organisational and environmental, individual and cultural barriers, financial barriers and technological barriers. Providers, patient and health policy-makers perspectives were captured. Conclusion Any development of telemedicine services should engage the primary users such as patients and their family caregivers to design people-centred digital health systems and services. Usability studies must be commissioned by the governments and host agencies to enhance the interaction experience pending which investments would remain futile. Future research should employ mixed methods or multi methods approaches to understand the interaction between patients and providers.
目的确定在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)采用远程医疗服务的障碍和促进因素。设计快速审查方法,从提供者和患者的角度确定卫生系统中接受/提供远程医疗的障碍和促进因素。采用两阶段顺序筛选工艺。数据提取是使用试点数据提取表单完成的。检索PubMed (NCBI)、Embase (Ovid)、Cochrane Library (Wiley)、Scopus (Elsevier)和WHO Global Index Medicus。选取研究的资格标准纳入了2012年1月1日至2022年7月1日期间发表的关于中低收入国家采用远程医疗服务的障碍和促进因素的研究。结果在数据库中检索到共2829篇引文。在删除1069个重复条目后,1760个条目进行了标题和摘要筛选。全文阶段共收录43篇文章,本综述共收录8篇文章进行叙事综合。采用和使用远程医疗的障碍和促进因素分为四个小标题,即组织和环境障碍、个人和文化障碍、财务障碍和技术障碍。获取了提供者、患者和卫生政策制定者的观点。结论任何远程医疗服务的发展都应该让患者及其家庭护理人员等主要用户参与进来,设计以人为本的数字卫生系统和服务。可用性研究必须由政府和主办机构委托,以提高交互体验,在此之前投资将是徒劳的。未来的研究应采用混合方法或多方法来了解患者与提供者之间的相互作用。
期刊介绍:
Healthcare is undergoing a revolution and novel medical technologies are being developed to treat patients in better and faster ways. Mobile revolution has put a handheld computer in pockets of billions and we are ushering in an era of mHealth. In developed and developing world alike healthcare costs are a concern and frugal innovations are being promoted for bringing down the costs of healthcare. BMJ Innovations aims to promote innovative research which creates new, cost-effective medical devices, technologies, processes and systems that improve patient care, with particular focus on the needs of patients, physicians, and the health care industry as a whole and act as a platform to catalyse and seed more innovations. Submissions to BMJ Innovations will be considered from all clinical areas of medicine along with business and process innovations that make healthcare accessible and affordable. Submissions from groups of investigators engaged in international collaborations are especially encouraged. The broad areas of innovations that this journal aims to chronicle include but are not limited to: Medical devices, mHealth and wearable health technologies, Assistive technologies, Diagnostics, Health IT, systems and process innovation.