Untersuchungen zum Wachstum und zur Persistenz von Escherichia coli O26:H11, O157:H7, O157:H45 und O159:H- bei Säurestress

IF 0.2 4区 农林科学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED Archiv Fur Lebensmittelhygiene Pub Date : 2009-01-01 DOI:10.2376/0003-925X-60-135
C. Zweifel, Timo Nauer, R. Stephan
{"title":"Untersuchungen zum Wachstum und zur Persistenz von Escherichia coli O26:H11, O157:H7, O157:H45 und O159:H- bei Säurestress","authors":"C. Zweifel, Timo Nauer, R. Stephan","doi":"10.2376/0003-925X-60-135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia (E.) coli (STEC) are a major cause of foodborne diseases in humans. STEC infections have also been associated with acidified or fermented products. This fact may indicate an increased acid resistance of STEC. In the present study, four pathogenic E. coli strains (STEC 0157:H7, STEC O26:H11, STEC O159:H - , EPEC 0157:H45) and a control strain (E coli K12) were examined for growth and persistence under hydrochloric, acetic and lactic acid stress. In the growth experiments, the 0157:H45 strain (hydrochloric and acetic acid) and the 0157:H7 strain (acetic acid) showed improved acid resistance, whereas no differences were evident for the other strains. In the survival experiments, significant differences were found between strains in the stationary and logarithmic growth phase. By comparison of the three acids, acetic acid proved to be most effective for growth inhibition and inactivation. The comparison of acid adapted and non adapted STEC O157:H7, STEC O159:H - and E coli K12 showed that strains adapted with hydrochloric acid exhibited improved acid resistance, but this effect was not confirmed after lactic acid adaptation. The adaptation with acetic acid improved the acid resistance of STEC O159:H - and E. coli K12, whereas that of STEC 0157:H7 was not affected. Consequently, remarkable strain-to-strain variation in the acid stress response of \"enteropathogenic\" E. coli was evident. This variation was rather influenced by the acid applied than by the serotype or the pattern of virulence factors of the strains.","PeriodicalId":8255,"journal":{"name":"Archiv Fur Lebensmittelhygiene","volume":"32 1","pages":"135-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv Fur Lebensmittelhygiene","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2376/0003-925X-60-135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia (E.) coli (STEC) are a major cause of foodborne diseases in humans. STEC infections have also been associated with acidified or fermented products. This fact may indicate an increased acid resistance of STEC. In the present study, four pathogenic E. coli strains (STEC 0157:H7, STEC O26:H11, STEC O159:H - , EPEC 0157:H45) and a control strain (E coli K12) were examined for growth and persistence under hydrochloric, acetic and lactic acid stress. In the growth experiments, the 0157:H45 strain (hydrochloric and acetic acid) and the 0157:H7 strain (acetic acid) showed improved acid resistance, whereas no differences were evident for the other strains. In the survival experiments, significant differences were found between strains in the stationary and logarithmic growth phase. By comparison of the three acids, acetic acid proved to be most effective for growth inhibition and inactivation. The comparison of acid adapted and non adapted STEC O157:H7, STEC O159:H - and E coli K12 showed that strains adapted with hydrochloric acid exhibited improved acid resistance, but this effect was not confirmed after lactic acid adaptation. The adaptation with acetic acid improved the acid resistance of STEC O159:H - and E. coli K12, whereas that of STEC 0157:H7 was not affected. Consequently, remarkable strain-to-strain variation in the acid stress response of "enteropathogenic" E. coli was evident. This variation was rather influenced by the acid applied than by the serotype or the pattern of virulence factors of the strains.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以西结奥利奥欧26:H11, O157:H7, O157:H45和O159:H抗酸压力
产志贺毒素大肠杆菌是人类食源性疾病的主要原因。产志贺毒素大肠杆菌感染也与酸化或发酵产品有关。这一事实可能表明产志贺毒素大肠杆菌的耐酸能力增强。在本研究中,研究了4株致病性大肠杆菌(STEC 0157:H7、STEC O26:H11、STEC O159:H -、EPEC 0157:H45)和对照菌株(大肠杆菌K12)在盐酸、乙酸和乳酸胁迫下的生长和持久性。在生长试验中,0157:H45菌株(盐酸和醋酸)和0157:H7菌株(醋酸)的耐酸性能均有提高,而其他菌株的耐酸性能差异不明显。在生存实验中,菌株在平稳生长期和对数生长期之间存在显著差异。通过对三种酸的比较,证明醋酸对生长抑制和失活最有效。比较酸适应菌株与非酸适应菌株O157:H7、STEC O159:H -和大肠杆菌K12,发现盐酸适应菌株的耐酸能力有所提高,但乳酸适应菌株的耐酸能力未得到证实。醋酸处理提高了STEC O159:H -和大肠杆菌K12的耐酸能力,而对STEC 0157:H7的耐酸能力没有影响。因此,“肠致病性”大肠杆菌在酸胁迫反应上的显著菌株间差异是显而易见的。这种变异受施用酸的影响,而不受菌株的血清型或毒力因子的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archiv Fur Lebensmittelhygiene
Archiv Fur Lebensmittelhygiene 工程技术-毒理学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Food Safety and Food Quality“ provides a platform for papers including case studies and discussion papers dealing with topics from all areas of food hygiene (food originating from animals) including dairy hygiene, food monitoring, beef cattle and meat examination, meat hygiene and food technology.
期刊最新文献
Growth of Listeria monocytogenes, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and yeasts on fresh vegetables packaged under modified atmospheres at 6 º C: Wachstum von Listeria monocytogenes, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis und Hefen auf frischen Gemüse verpackt unter Schutzatmosphären bei 6 °C Detection of Salmonella in poultry meat using culture method, enzyme-linked fluorescent immunoassay and immuno-chromatography Microbiological quality of typical foods served in Thai restaurants in Vienna, Austria Implementierung einer risikoorientierten Fleischuntersuchung ohne Anschnitte beim Mastschwein in einem nord-deutschen Schlachtunternehmen Studies on the growth of Salmonella in table eggs under different storage temperatures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1