Implementation of Mental Health Policies toward Indonesia Free Restraint

D. Ayuningtyas, M. Rayhani, M. Misnaniarti, Asri Nur Maulidya
{"title":"Implementation of Mental Health Policies toward Indonesia Free Restraint","authors":"D. Ayuningtyas, M. Rayhani, M. Misnaniarti, Asri Nur Maulidya","doi":"10.30589/PGR.V2I2.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mental health disorders are still one of the most prominent health problems in the world, including in Indonesia. There is still a misguided stigma and discrimination on people with mental disorders, so more than 56,000 of them experience restraint. This study aims to determine the efforts and review the implementation of Law no. 18/2014 about Mental Health until 2017. This is a policy study using literature review. Descriptive exploration is done using a policy analysis framework in the implementation phase based on Edwards III model. The unit of analysis is mental health policy in Indonesia. The results show that only a few local governments initiate special mental health regulations as well as more operational programs. Activities are still focused on curative and rehabilitative efforts. There has been prevention of deprivation through the ‘Indonesia Free Restraint’ program since 1977 but this has not gone well. The communication process encountered problems of unclear and inconsistent information. Moreover, not all local governments use the authority to regulate the mental health policy to mobilize resources. Law no. 18/2014 has not been implemented optimally. Not all implementers and policy targets are dedicated to direction of the Law. Neither not all aspects of mental health efforts have programs, Standard Operating Procedure and coordination governance. Conversely, optimal implementation can be done by introducing it as an element of primary health in basic health service.","PeriodicalId":32198,"journal":{"name":"Policy and Governance Review","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy and Governance Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30589/PGR.V2I2.85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Mental health disorders are still one of the most prominent health problems in the world, including in Indonesia. There is still a misguided stigma and discrimination on people with mental disorders, so more than 56,000 of them experience restraint. This study aims to determine the efforts and review the implementation of Law no. 18/2014 about Mental Health until 2017. This is a policy study using literature review. Descriptive exploration is done using a policy analysis framework in the implementation phase based on Edwards III model. The unit of analysis is mental health policy in Indonesia. The results show that only a few local governments initiate special mental health regulations as well as more operational programs. Activities are still focused on curative and rehabilitative efforts. There has been prevention of deprivation through the ‘Indonesia Free Restraint’ program since 1977 but this has not gone well. The communication process encountered problems of unclear and inconsistent information. Moreover, not all local governments use the authority to regulate the mental health policy to mobilize resources. Law no. 18/2014 has not been implemented optimally. Not all implementers and policy targets are dedicated to direction of the Law. Neither not all aspects of mental health efforts have programs, Standard Operating Procedure and coordination governance. Conversely, optimal implementation can be done by introducing it as an element of primary health in basic health service.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚精神卫生政策的实施:自由约束
精神健康障碍仍然是世界上最突出的健康问题之一,包括在印度尼西亚。对于精神障碍患者,仍然存在一种错误的污名和歧视,因此,超过56000名精神障碍患者受到了限制。本研究旨在确定第1号法的实施力度并对其进行审查。关于心理健康的18/2014,直到2017年。这是一项采用文献回顾法的政策研究。在实施阶段使用基于Edwards III模型的政策分析框架进行描述性探索。分析的单位是印度尼西亚的精神卫生政策。结果表明,只有少数地方政府制定了专门的精神卫生法规,而更多的是操作性项目。活动的重点仍然是治疗和康复工作。自1977年以来,通过“印尼自由约束”项目防止了剥夺,但进展并不顺利。沟通过程中遇到了信息不清晰、不一致的问题。此外,并非所有地方政府都利用权力来规范精神卫生政策以调动资源。法律没有。18/2014没有得到最佳执行。并非所有执行者和政策目标都致力于法律的指导。也不是所有方面的精神卫生工作都有规划、标准操作程序和协调治理。相反,通过将其作为基本保健服务中初级保健的一个组成部分,可以实现最佳执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
What Indonesian Netizen Says about Covid-19 Vaccination? A Corpus Assisted Discourse Studies of YouTube’s Comment Human Resources and Technology Integration in Effective Public Management Policy Convergence under Decentralization: Lessons from Indonesia’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic Bureaucratic Transformation Optimizing Village Bureaucracy Transformation: Gorontalo, Indonesia The The Uniqueness of Managerial Competency Model in Indonesian Districts and Cities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1