Pharmacological agents for adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Sharon R Lewis, Michael W Pritchard, Carmel M Thomas, Andrew F Smith
{"title":"Pharmacological agents for adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome.","authors":"Sharon R Lewis, Michael W Pritchard, Carmel M Thomas, Andrew F Smith","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD004477.pub3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition caused by direct or indirect injury to the lungs. Despite improvements in clinical management (for example, lung protection strategies), mortality in this patient group is at approximately 40%. This is an update of a previous version of this review, last published in 2004.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacological agents in adults with ARDS on mortality, mechanical ventilation, and fitness to return to work at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL on 10 December 2018. We searched clinical trials registers and grey literature, and handsearched reference lists of included studies and related reviews.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pharmacological agents with control (placebo or standard therapy) to treat adults with established ARDS. We excluded trials of nitric oxide, inhaled prostacyclins, partial liquid ventilation, neuromuscular blocking agents, fluid and nutritional interventions and medical oxygen. We excluded studies published earlier than 2000, because of changes to lung protection strategies for people with ARDS since this date.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risks of bias. We assessed the certainty of evidence with GRADE.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>We included 48 RCTs with 6299 participants who had ARDS; two included only participants with mild ARDS (also called acute lung injury). Most studies included causes of ARDS that were both direct and indirect injuries. We noted differences between studies, for example the time of administration or the size of dose, and because of unclear reporting we were uncertain whether all studies had used equivalent lung protection strategies.We included five types of agents as the primary comparisons in the review: corticosteroids, surfactants, N-acetylcysteine, statins, and beta-agonists. We included 15 additional agents (sivelestat, mesenchymal stem cells, ulinastatin, anisodimine, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, recombinant human ACE2 (palifermin), AP301, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), levosimendan, prostacyclins, lisofylline, ketaconazole, nitroglycerins, L-2-oxothiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid (OTZ), and penehyclidine hydrochloride).We used GRADE to downgrade outcomes for imprecision (because of few studies and few participants), for study limitations (e.g. high risks of bias) and for inconsistency (e.g. differences between study data).Corticosteroids versus placebo or standard therapyCorticosteroids may reduce all-cause mortality within three months by 86 per 1000 patients (with as many as 161 fewer to 19 more deaths); however, the 95% confidence interval (CI) includes the possibility of both increased and reduced deaths (risk ratio (RR) 0.77, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.05; 6 studies, 574 participants; low-certainty evidence). Due to the very low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain whether corticosteroids make little or no difference to late all-cause mortality (later than three months) (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.52; 1 study, 180 participants), or to the duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference (MD) -4.30, 95% CI -9.72 to 1.12; 3 studies, 277 participants). We found that ventilator-free days up to day 28 (VFD) may be improved with corticosteroids (MD 4.09, 95% CI 1.74 to 6.44; 4 studies, 494 participants; low-certainty evidence). No studies reported adverse events leading to discontinuation of study medication, or fitness to return to work at 12 months (FTR).Surfactants versus placebo or standard therapyWe are uncertain whether surfactants make little or no difference to early mortality (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.29; 9 studies, 1338 participants), or whether they reduce late all-cause mortality (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.61; 1 study, 418 participants). Similarly, we are uncertain whether surfactants reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation (MD -2.50, 95% CI -4.95 to -0.05; 1 study, 16 participants), make little or no difference to VFD (MD -0.39, 95% CI -2.49 to 1.72; 2 studies, 344 participants), or to adverse events leading to discontinuation of study medication (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.44; 2 studies, 88 participants). We are uncertain of these effects because we assessed them as very low-certainty. No studies reported FTR.N-aceytylcysteine versus placeboWe are uncertain whether N-acetylcysteine makes little or no difference to early mortality, because we assessed this as very low-certainty evidence (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.30; 1 study, 36 participants). No studies reported late all-cause mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, VFD, adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation, or FTR.Statins versus placeboStatins probably make little or no difference to early mortality (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.26; 3 studies, 1344 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) or to VFD (MD 0.40, 95% CI -0.71 to 1.52; 3 studies, 1342 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Statins may make little or no difference to duration of mechanical ventilation (MD 2.70, 95% CI -3.55 to 8.95; 1 study, 60 participants; low-certainty evidence). We could not include data for adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation in one study because it was unclearly reported. No studies reported late all-cause mortality or FTR.Beta-agonists versus placebo controlBeta-blockers probably slightly increase early mortality by 40 per 1000 patients (with as many as 119 more or 25 fewer deaths); however, the 95% CI includes the possibility of an increase as well as a reduction in mortality (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.42; 3 studies, 646 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Due to the very low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain whether beta-agonists increase VFD (MD -2.20, 95% CI -3.68 to -0.71; 3 studies, 646 participants), or make little or no difference to adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation (one study reported little or no difference between groups, and one study reported more events in the beta-agonist group). No studies reported late all-cause mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, or FTR.</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>We found insufficient evidence to determine with certainty whether corticosteroids, surfactants, N-acetylcysteine, statins, or beta-agonists were effective at reducing mortality in people with ARDS, or duration of mechanical ventilation, or increasing ventilator-free days. Three studies awaiting classification may alter the conclusions of this review. As the potential long-term consequences of ARDS are important to survivors, future research should incorporate a longer follow-up to measure the impacts on quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":10674,"journal":{"name":"Collection of Czechoslovak Chemical Communications","volume":"58 1","pages":"CD004477"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6646953/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collection of Czechoslovak Chemical Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004477.pub3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition caused by direct or indirect injury to the lungs. Despite improvements in clinical management (for example, lung protection strategies), mortality in this patient group is at approximately 40%. This is an update of a previous version of this review, last published in 2004.

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacological agents in adults with ARDS on mortality, mechanical ventilation, and fitness to return to work at 12 months.

Search methods: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL on 10 December 2018. We searched clinical trials registers and grey literature, and handsearched reference lists of included studies and related reviews.

Selection criteria: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pharmacological agents with control (placebo or standard therapy) to treat adults with established ARDS. We excluded trials of nitric oxide, inhaled prostacyclins, partial liquid ventilation, neuromuscular blocking agents, fluid and nutritional interventions and medical oxygen. We excluded studies published earlier than 2000, because of changes to lung protection strategies for people with ARDS since this date.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risks of bias. We assessed the certainty of evidence with GRADE.

Main results: We included 48 RCTs with 6299 participants who had ARDS; two included only participants with mild ARDS (also called acute lung injury). Most studies included causes of ARDS that were both direct and indirect injuries. We noted differences between studies, for example the time of administration or the size of dose, and because of unclear reporting we were uncertain whether all studies had used equivalent lung protection strategies.We included five types of agents as the primary comparisons in the review: corticosteroids, surfactants, N-acetylcysteine, statins, and beta-agonists. We included 15 additional agents (sivelestat, mesenchymal stem cells, ulinastatin, anisodimine, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, recombinant human ACE2 (palifermin), AP301, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), levosimendan, prostacyclins, lisofylline, ketaconazole, nitroglycerins, L-2-oxothiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid (OTZ), and penehyclidine hydrochloride).We used GRADE to downgrade outcomes for imprecision (because of few studies and few participants), for study limitations (e.g. high risks of bias) and for inconsistency (e.g. differences between study data).Corticosteroids versus placebo or standard therapyCorticosteroids may reduce all-cause mortality within three months by 86 per 1000 patients (with as many as 161 fewer to 19 more deaths); however, the 95% confidence interval (CI) includes the possibility of both increased and reduced deaths (risk ratio (RR) 0.77, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.05; 6 studies, 574 participants; low-certainty evidence). Due to the very low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain whether corticosteroids make little or no difference to late all-cause mortality (later than three months) (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.52; 1 study, 180 participants), or to the duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference (MD) -4.30, 95% CI -9.72 to 1.12; 3 studies, 277 participants). We found that ventilator-free days up to day 28 (VFD) may be improved with corticosteroids (MD 4.09, 95% CI 1.74 to 6.44; 4 studies, 494 participants; low-certainty evidence). No studies reported adverse events leading to discontinuation of study medication, or fitness to return to work at 12 months (FTR).Surfactants versus placebo or standard therapyWe are uncertain whether surfactants make little or no difference to early mortality (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.29; 9 studies, 1338 participants), or whether they reduce late all-cause mortality (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.61; 1 study, 418 participants). Similarly, we are uncertain whether surfactants reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation (MD -2.50, 95% CI -4.95 to -0.05; 1 study, 16 participants), make little or no difference to VFD (MD -0.39, 95% CI -2.49 to 1.72; 2 studies, 344 participants), or to adverse events leading to discontinuation of study medication (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.44; 2 studies, 88 participants). We are uncertain of these effects because we assessed them as very low-certainty. No studies reported FTR.N-aceytylcysteine versus placeboWe are uncertain whether N-acetylcysteine makes little or no difference to early mortality, because we assessed this as very low-certainty evidence (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.30; 1 study, 36 participants). No studies reported late all-cause mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, VFD, adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation, or FTR.Statins versus placeboStatins probably make little or no difference to early mortality (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.26; 3 studies, 1344 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) or to VFD (MD 0.40, 95% CI -0.71 to 1.52; 3 studies, 1342 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Statins may make little or no difference to duration of mechanical ventilation (MD 2.70, 95% CI -3.55 to 8.95; 1 study, 60 participants; low-certainty evidence). We could not include data for adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation in one study because it was unclearly reported. No studies reported late all-cause mortality or FTR.Beta-agonists versus placebo controlBeta-blockers probably slightly increase early mortality by 40 per 1000 patients (with as many as 119 more or 25 fewer deaths); however, the 95% CI includes the possibility of an increase as well as a reduction in mortality (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.42; 3 studies, 646 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Due to the very low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain whether beta-agonists increase VFD (MD -2.20, 95% CI -3.68 to -0.71; 3 studies, 646 participants), or make little or no difference to adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation (one study reported little or no difference between groups, and one study reported more events in the beta-agonist group). No studies reported late all-cause mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, or FTR.

Authors' conclusions: We found insufficient evidence to determine with certainty whether corticosteroids, surfactants, N-acetylcysteine, statins, or beta-agonists were effective at reducing mortality in people with ARDS, or duration of mechanical ventilation, or increasing ventilator-free days. Three studies awaiting classification may alter the conclusions of this review. As the potential long-term consequences of ARDS are important to survivors, future research should incorporate a longer follow-up to measure the impacts on quality of life.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗成人急性呼吸窘迫综合征的药物。
背景:急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)是由肺部直接或间接损伤引起的危及生命的疾病。尽管临床管理有所改善(例如肺保护策略),但该患者组的死亡率约为40%。这是对本综述的上一版本的更新,上次发表于2004年。目的评价药物治疗成人急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者12个月时死亡率、机械通气和恢复工作能力的有效性。检索方法我们于2018年12月10日检索了CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase和CINAHL。我们检索了临床试验注册和灰色文献,并手工检索了纳入研究和相关综述的参考文献列表。选择标准我们纳入了比较药物与对照组(安慰剂或标准疗法)治疗已确诊的成人ARDS的随机对照试验(rct)。我们排除了一氧化氮、吸入性前列环素、部分液体通气、神经肌肉阻断剂、液体和营养干预以及医用氧的试验。我们排除了2000年以前发表的研究,因为自2000年以来,ARDS患者的肺保护策略发生了变化。数据收集和分析两篇综述作者独立评估了研究的纳入、提取数据和评估偏倚风险。我们用GRADE评估证据的确定性。我们纳入48项随机对照试验,6299名ARDS患者;其中两项仅包括轻度ARDS(也称为急性肺损伤)的参与者。大多数研究包括ARDS的直接和间接伤害原因。我们注意到研究之间的差异,例如给药时间或剂量大小,并且由于报告不明确,我们不确定是否所有研究都使用了相同的肺保护策略。我们在综述中纳入了五种类型的药物作为主要比较:皮质类固醇、表面活性剂、n -乙酰半胱氨酸、他汀类药物和β受体激动剂。我们纳入了另外15种药物(西维司他、间充质干细胞、乌司他丁、山莨菪碱、血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂、重组人ACE2 (palifermin)、AP301、粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)、左西孟旦、前列环素、异油碱、酮康唑、硝化甘油、l -2-氧噻唑烷-4-羧酸(OTZ)和盐酸戊乙奎醚)。我们使用GRADE来降低结果的不精确性(因为研究和参与者很少)、研究局限性(例如高偏倚风险)和不一致性(例如研究数据之间的差异)。与安慰剂或标准治疗相比,皮质类固醇可使3个月内的全因死亡率每1000名患者降低86例(死亡人数减少161例至19例);然而,95%置信区间(CI)包括死亡增加和减少的可能性(风险比(RR) 0.77, 95% CI 0.57 ~ 1.05;6项研究,574名参与者;确定性的证据)。由于证据的确定性非常低,我们不确定皮质类固醇对晚期全因死亡率(超过3个月)的影响是否很小或没有影响(RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.64至1.52;1项研究,180名受试者),或机械通气持续时间(平均差异(MD) -4.30, 95% CI -9.72至1.12;3项研究,277名参与者)。我们发现皮质类固醇可改善无呼吸机天数(VFD) (MD 4.09, 95% CI 1.74至6.44;4项研究,494名参与者;确定性的证据)。没有研究报告不良事件导致研究药物停药,或12个月后恢复工作(FTR)。表面活性剂与安慰剂或标准治疗相比,我们不确定表面活性剂对早期死亡率的影响是很小还是没有差异(RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.91至1.29;9项研究,1338名受试者),或者是否降低晚期全因死亡率(RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.01 - 1.61;1项研究,418名参与者)。同样,我们不确定表面活性剂是否会缩短机械通气时间(MD -2.50, 95% CI -4.95至-0.05;1项研究,16名参与者),对VFD的影响很小或没有影响(MD -0.39, 95% CI -2.49至1.72;2项研究,344名受试者),或不良事件导致停止研究用药(RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.17 ~ 1.44;2项研究,88名参与者)。我们不确定这些影响,因为我们评估它们的确定性非常低。没有研究报告FTR。n -乙酰半胱氨酸与安慰剂我们不确定n -乙酰半胱氨酸对早期死亡率的影响是否很小或没有影响,因为我们将其评估为非常低确定性的证据(RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.32至1.30;1项研究,36名参与者)。没有研究报告晚期全因死亡率、机械通气持续时间、VFD、导致研究药物停药的不良事件或FTR。他汀类药物与安慰剂相比,他汀类药物对早期死亡率的影响可能很小或没有差异(RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.78 - 1)。 26;3 项研究,1344 名参与者;中度确定性证据)或 VFD(MD 0.40,95% CI -0.71 至 1.52;3 项研究,1342 名参与者;中度确定性证据)。他汀类药物对机械通气持续时间的影响可能很小或没有影响(MD 2.70,95% CI -3.55至8.95;1项研究,60名参与者;低度确定性证据)。我们无法纳入一项研究中导致停药的不良事件数据,因为其报告不明确。β-受体激动剂与安慰剂对照β-受体阻滞剂可能会略微增加早期死亡率,每 1000 例患者中有 40 例死亡(多达 119 例增加或 25 例减少);然而,95% CI 包括死亡率增加或减少的可能性(RR 1.14,95% CI 0.91 至 1.42;3 项研究,646 例参与者;中度确定性证据)。由于证据的确定性很低,我们无法确定β-受体激动剂是否会增加VFD(MD -2.20,95% CI -3.68至-0.71;3项研究,646名参与者),或对导致研究药物停用的不良事件影响很小或没有影响(一项研究报道组间差异很小或没有差异,一项研究报道β-受体激动剂组发生的事件较多)。没有研究报告了后期全因死亡率、机械通气持续时间或 FTR:我们没有发现足够的证据来确定皮质类固醇、表面活性物质、N-乙酰半胱氨酸、他汀类药物或β-受体激动剂是否能有效降低ARDS患者的死亡率、缩短机械通气时间或增加无呼吸机天数。三项有待分类的研究可能会改变本综述的结论。由于 ARDS 潜在的长期后果对幸存者非常重要,因此未来的研究应纳入更长时间的随访,以衡量对生活质量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 months
期刊最新文献
Stress Accumulation, Depressive Symptoms, and Sleep Problems among Black Americans in the Rural South. Comparative effectiveness of parent-child interaction therapy based on trauma exposure and attrition. Orbital Exenteration: Tumour Diversity and Survival-Report from a Cancer Centre of Northeast India. Early-life respiratory tract infections and the risk of school-age lower lung function and asthma: a meta-analysis of 150 000 European children. [Study of an ocular ptosis in a 13th century illuminated manuscript].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1