Climate finance, conflict and gender—Benchmarking women’s empowerment and sustaining peace

Catherine Wong
{"title":"Climate finance, conflict and gender—Benchmarking women’s empowerment and sustaining peace","authors":"Catherine Wong","doi":"10.1177/27538796231184933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The intersection of knowledge and practice in climate finance, peace, and women’s empowerment remains understudied even though the aspirations of climate and peacebuilding finance on gender mainstreaming and women’s empowerment are actually well aligned. They have in common, an emphasis on the undervalued role of women, the importance of women assuming leadership roles, the elevated agency that finance would afford in, respectively, climate action and sustaining peace, and the full participation of women. At a fundamental level, there is a strong inherent understanding of women’s role in natural resource governance and stewardship that cuts across both the normative framings of climate and peacebuilding finance. Climate financing mechanisms such as the “vertical funds” have over the years introduced sophisticated performance metrics for gender and women’s empowerment, but none to address conflict or fragility. The key gap as highlighted by UNDP is the understanding of the peace co-benefits of climate finance, which means that women in conflict settings may be left behind. This article examines progress on gender and climate finance; the gaps in access by conflict and fragility-affected regions; the benchmarking of climate finance and peace mainstreaming; and a comparative approach for greater cross-fertilization.","PeriodicalId":11727,"journal":{"name":"Environment, Biodiversity and Soil Security","volume":"9 1","pages":"62 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment, Biodiversity and Soil Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27538796231184933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The intersection of knowledge and practice in climate finance, peace, and women’s empowerment remains understudied even though the aspirations of climate and peacebuilding finance on gender mainstreaming and women’s empowerment are actually well aligned. They have in common, an emphasis on the undervalued role of women, the importance of women assuming leadership roles, the elevated agency that finance would afford in, respectively, climate action and sustaining peace, and the full participation of women. At a fundamental level, there is a strong inherent understanding of women’s role in natural resource governance and stewardship that cuts across both the normative framings of climate and peacebuilding finance. Climate financing mechanisms such as the “vertical funds” have over the years introduced sophisticated performance metrics for gender and women’s empowerment, but none to address conflict or fragility. The key gap as highlighted by UNDP is the understanding of the peace co-benefits of climate finance, which means that women in conflict settings may be left behind. This article examines progress on gender and climate finance; the gaps in access by conflict and fragility-affected regions; the benchmarking of climate finance and peace mainstreaming; and a comparative approach for greater cross-fertilization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气候融资、冲突和性别平等——以妇女赋权和维持和平为基准
尽管气候与建设和平融资在性别主流化和妇女赋权方面的抱负实际上是一致的,但气候融资、和平与妇女赋权方面的知识与实践的交集仍未得到充分研究。它们的共同点是强调妇女的作用被低估,强调妇女担任领导角色的重要性,强调金融在气候行动和维持和平方面发挥的重要作用,以及强调妇女的充分参与。在基本层面上,人们对妇女在自然资源治理和管理中的作用有着根深蒂固的认识,这种认识贯穿了气候和建设和平融资的规范框架。多年来,诸如“垂直基金”之类的气候融资机制引入了复杂的性别和妇女赋权绩效指标,但没有一个是针对冲突或脆弱性的。正如联合国开发计划署所强调的,关键差距是对气候融资的和平协同效益的理解,这意味着冲突环境中的妇女可能会被抛在后面。本文考察了性别与气候融资方面的进展;受冲突和脆弱性影响地区在获取服务方面的差距;气候融资与和平主流化的基准;还有一种比较的方法,可以促进异种受精。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Community voices on climate, peace and security: A social learning approach to programming environmental peacebuilding Interventions addressing conflict in communities hosting climate-influenced migrants: Literature review Protection of the environment in relation to armed conflict—50 years of effort, and no end in sight Climate change and homeland security nexus: Proposal for a comprehensive conceptual framework Positive peace and environmental sustainability: Local evidence from Afghanistan and Nepal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1