Attachment Styles and Personality Structure

Viviana Miño, Simón Guendelman, Álvaro Castillo-Carniglia, Carlos Sandaña, S. Quintana
{"title":"Attachment Styles and Personality Structure","authors":"Viviana Miño, Simón Guendelman, Álvaro Castillo-Carniglia, Carlos Sandaña, S. Quintana","doi":"10.4172/2167-1044.1000302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Several studies have shown that insecure attachment representations play a central role in the psychopathology of personality disorders, however, it is unclear how the adult attachment disorders relate to the personality organization. \nObjective: To evaluate the correlation between secure, dismissing and preoccuppied attachment styles and personality structure, in two samples: a clinic and a control group. \nMethods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study with a sample of 27 women hospitalized in a psychiatric unit and a non-clinical sample of 24 women in regular health check. Inventory of Personality Organization (IPO) and the Cartes: Modeles Individuels de Relation (CAMIR) were applied. \nResults: The percentage of secure prototype is lower in the clinical group (14.8% vs. 37.5%). The clinical group showed on average 22 points higher on the IPO. No significant association between attachment style and the three primary scales of the IPO was observed, although the score on these three scales was lower among those with a secure attachment style. People with secure attachment had on average 42 points lower on the OQ-45.2 than the other two groups, a difference that was statistically significant. \nConclusion: Small sample size would not permit the association to be statistically significant. Further research is needed.","PeriodicalId":15532,"journal":{"name":"Journal of depression & anxiety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of depression & anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1044.1000302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Several studies have shown that insecure attachment representations play a central role in the psychopathology of personality disorders, however, it is unclear how the adult attachment disorders relate to the personality organization. Objective: To evaluate the correlation between secure, dismissing and preoccuppied attachment styles and personality structure, in two samples: a clinic and a control group. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study with a sample of 27 women hospitalized in a psychiatric unit and a non-clinical sample of 24 women in regular health check. Inventory of Personality Organization (IPO) and the Cartes: Modeles Individuels de Relation (CAMIR) were applied. Results: The percentage of secure prototype is lower in the clinical group (14.8% vs. 37.5%). The clinical group showed on average 22 points higher on the IPO. No significant association between attachment style and the three primary scales of the IPO was observed, although the score on these three scales was lower among those with a secure attachment style. People with secure attachment had on average 42 points lower on the OQ-45.2 than the other two groups, a difference that was statistically significant. Conclusion: Small sample size would not permit the association to be statistically significant. Further research is needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
依恋类型和人格结构
一些研究表明,不安全依恋表征在人格障碍的精神病理中起着核心作用,然而,成人依恋障碍与人格组织的关系尚不清楚。目的:以临床和对照组为研究对象,探讨安全型、回避型和专注型依恋类型与人格结构的关系。方法:一项描述性横断面研究,样本为27名在精神科住院的妇女和24名定期健康检查的非临床样本。运用了人格组织量表(IPO)和个体关系量表(CAMIR)。结果:临床组安全原型比例较低(14.8% vs. 37.5%)。临床组的IPO平均高出22点。依恋类型与IPO的三个主要量表之间没有显著的关联,尽管安全依恋类型的人在这三个量表上的得分较低。安全型依恋的人比其他两组平均低42分,得分为45.2分,这一差异在统计学上是显著的。结论:小样本量不允许这种关联具有统计学意义。需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Treatment Utilization of Patients Diagnosed with Depression and Anxiety Disorders Based on Kentucky Medicaid 2012-2019 Datasets. The Association Between Gratitude and Depression: A Meta-Analysis Submission Anxiety: ORCID, Publons, Cabell's, APC, Index Factor, Open Access, "Predatory" and Wait Time (As Well as Other Things) The Role of Pets in the Mental Health Implications of the COVD-19 Pandemic Managing Anxiety and Stress Holistically: Vedic Wisdom from the Purna Health Management System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1