Security Logics of Africa’s Divided Position on Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine

IF 0.3 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE Strategic Review for Southern Africa Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.35293/srsa.v44i1.4054
Hassan Aden, Nicholas Marsh
{"title":"Security Logics of Africa’s Divided Position on Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine","authors":"Hassan Aden, Nicholas Marsh","doi":"10.35293/srsa.v44i1.4054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines African states’ security interests concerning Russia in order to explain those states’ voting behaviour on a UN resolution condemning the invasion of Ukraine. African states do not form a bloc ready to support action taken by ‘the West’. Many African states are themselves authoritarian and harbour longstanding suspicion of European and North American powers. Russia has also built close security relations with many African governments as an arms supplier, provider of military assistance, and source of private military companies. Overall, African states may prefer to maintain relations with both Russia and its opponents rather than choosing between rival blocs.","PeriodicalId":41892,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Review for Southern Africa","volume":"140 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Review for Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35293/srsa.v44i1.4054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines African states’ security interests concerning Russia in order to explain those states’ voting behaviour on a UN resolution condemning the invasion of Ukraine. African states do not form a bloc ready to support action taken by ‘the West’. Many African states are themselves authoritarian and harbour longstanding suspicion of European and North American powers. Russia has also built close security relations with many African governments as an arms supplier, provider of military assistance, and source of private military companies. Overall, African states may prefer to maintain relations with both Russia and its opponents rather than choosing between rival blocs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯入侵乌克兰问题上非洲立场分歧的安全逻辑
本文考察了非洲国家在俄罗斯问题上的安全利益,以解释这些国家对谴责入侵乌克兰的联合国决议的投票行为。非洲国家并没有形成一个准备好支持“西方”采取行动的集团。许多非洲国家本身就是专制国家,长期以来对欧洲和北美列强心存疑虑。俄罗斯还作为武器供应国、军事援助提供者和私营军事公司的来源,与许多非洲国家政府建立了密切的安全关系。总的来说,非洲国家可能更愿意与俄罗斯及其对手保持关系,而不是在敌对集团之间做出选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Peace Enforcement in the Democratic Republic of Congo Editorial The Kampala Convention and Challenges to Geopolitical Security Why Burundi intervenes in the DRC: Self-interest to Pan-Africanist considerations? Decolonizing Knowledge Production and Power Relations in African Studies: Prospects and Challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1