Sakiadis Flow of Harris Fluids: a Series-Solution

N. Khabazi, M. Aryan, Jalil Jamali, K. Sadeghy
{"title":"Sakiadis Flow of Harris Fluids: a Series-Solution","authors":"N. Khabazi, M. Aryan, Jalil Jamali, K. Sadeghy","doi":"10.1678/RHEOLOGY.42.245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Boundary layer theory is without doubt one of the most successful approximations in the history of fluid mechanics. This is certainly true for Newtonian fluids but for non-Newtonian fluids, the theory is still regarded as incomplete. A major obstacle in extending the theory to non-Newtonian fluids is in the diversity of their constitutive behavior meaning that each fluid model should be treated separately. Furthermore, the nonlinearity introduced by their shear-dependent viscosity and/or elasticity often gives rise to a formidable mathematical task which cannot be solved, at times, even numerically. Understandably, the situation becomes much more complicated when the viscosity of the fluid is time-dependent (e.g., when the fluid is thixotropic). Such fluid systems are quite frequent in industrial applications (e.g., drilling muds) with the common effect being that their viscosity drops with the progress of time at any given shear rate. Due to the complexity of their rheological behavior, working with thixotropic fluids is not an easy task. A major problem is the lack of a robust and easy-to-use rheological model which can describe such behavior. Among different rheological models available to represent such fluid systems Harris model is without doubt one of the simplest ones, albeit admittedly not the best one. Interestingly, the model developed by Harris can also represent purely-viscous shearthinning fluids for certain set of parameter values. Harris tried this version of his rheological model to study Blasius flow. He relied on the technique of similarity solution and reduced the boundary layer equations into a single ODE. But, the equation so obtained was realized to be too formidable to render itself to an analytical or even numerical solution so that it remained unsolved until recently. As a matter of fact, in a recent work Sadeqi et al relied on a robust numerical method to tackle Blasius flow of shear-thinning fluids obeying Harris model. They also showed that Harris model can represent thixotropic fluids only for certain values of the model parameters. In the present work we would like to extend the work carried out in Ref. 15 to Sakiadis flow. Due to the strong nonlinearity of the governing equation, we have decided to rely on the homotopy analysis method (HAM) in the present work. Unlike perturbation techniques, HAM is independent of the smallness/largeness of any parameter involved in the problem. In addition, it provides a simple way to ensure the convergence of the series-solution so that one can always come up with a sufficiently accurate approximation to the solution (even for strongly non-linear problems). Furthermore, unlike all other analytical techniques, the homotopy analysis method provides great freedom in choosing the so-called Sakiadis Flow of Harris Fluids: a Series-Solution","PeriodicalId":17434,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society of Rheology, Japan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society of Rheology, Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1678/RHEOLOGY.42.245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Boundary layer theory is without doubt one of the most successful approximations in the history of fluid mechanics. This is certainly true for Newtonian fluids but for non-Newtonian fluids, the theory is still regarded as incomplete. A major obstacle in extending the theory to non-Newtonian fluids is in the diversity of their constitutive behavior meaning that each fluid model should be treated separately. Furthermore, the nonlinearity introduced by their shear-dependent viscosity and/or elasticity often gives rise to a formidable mathematical task which cannot be solved, at times, even numerically. Understandably, the situation becomes much more complicated when the viscosity of the fluid is time-dependent (e.g., when the fluid is thixotropic). Such fluid systems are quite frequent in industrial applications (e.g., drilling muds) with the common effect being that their viscosity drops with the progress of time at any given shear rate. Due to the complexity of their rheological behavior, working with thixotropic fluids is not an easy task. A major problem is the lack of a robust and easy-to-use rheological model which can describe such behavior. Among different rheological models available to represent such fluid systems Harris model is without doubt one of the simplest ones, albeit admittedly not the best one. Interestingly, the model developed by Harris can also represent purely-viscous shearthinning fluids for certain set of parameter values. Harris tried this version of his rheological model to study Blasius flow. He relied on the technique of similarity solution and reduced the boundary layer equations into a single ODE. But, the equation so obtained was realized to be too formidable to render itself to an analytical or even numerical solution so that it remained unsolved until recently. As a matter of fact, in a recent work Sadeqi et al relied on a robust numerical method to tackle Blasius flow of shear-thinning fluids obeying Harris model. They also showed that Harris model can represent thixotropic fluids only for certain values of the model parameters. In the present work we would like to extend the work carried out in Ref. 15 to Sakiadis flow. Due to the strong nonlinearity of the governing equation, we have decided to rely on the homotopy analysis method (HAM) in the present work. Unlike perturbation techniques, HAM is independent of the smallness/largeness of any parameter involved in the problem. In addition, it provides a simple way to ensure the convergence of the series-solution so that one can always come up with a sufficiently accurate approximation to the solution (even for strongly non-linear problems). Furthermore, unlike all other analytical techniques, the homotopy analysis method provides great freedom in choosing the so-called Sakiadis Flow of Harris Fluids: a Series-Solution
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sakiadis流动Harris流体:系列解决方案
边界层理论无疑是流体力学史上最成功的近似理论之一。这对于牛顿流体当然是正确的,但是对于非牛顿流体,这个理论仍然被认为是不完整的。将该理论扩展到非牛顿流体的一个主要障碍是它们的本构行为的多样性,这意味着每种流体模型应该单独处理。此外,由它们的剪切依赖的粘度和/或弹性所引入的非线性常常引起一个难以解决的数学任务,有时甚至无法用数值方法解决。可以理解的是,当流体的粘度随时间变化时(例如,当流体是触变性时),情况就变得复杂得多。这种流体系统在工业应用中非常常见(例如,钻井泥浆),其常见效果是在任何给定的剪切速率下,它们的粘度随着时间的推移而下降。由于触变性流体流变行为的复杂性,处理触变性流体并不是一件容易的事。一个主要的问题是缺乏一个强大的和易于使用的流变模型,可以描述这种行为。在不同的流变学模型中,Harris模型虽然不是最好的,但无疑是最简单的模型之一。有趣的是,Harris建立的模型也可以在一定的参数值下表示纯粘性剪切稀化流体。哈里斯尝试了他的流变模型的这个版本来研究布拉修斯流。他利用相似解技术,将边界层方程简化为一个ODE。但是,人们意识到,这样得到的方程太可怕了,无法用解析法甚至是数值法来解决,所以直到最近才得到解决。事实上,在Sadeqi等人最近的工作中,依靠一种鲁棒的数值方法来处理服从Harris模型的剪切变薄流体的Blasius流动。他们还表明,哈里斯模型只能在一定的模型参数值下代表触变流体。在目前的工作中,我们希望将参考文献15中进行的工作扩展到Sakiadis流。由于控制方程的强非线性,我们决定在本工作中依靠同伦分析法(HAM)。与摄动技术不同,HAM与问题中涉及的任何参数的大小无关。此外,它还提供了一种简单的方法来确保级数解的收敛性,这样就可以总是得到一个足够精确的近似解(即使对于强非线性问题)。此外,与所有其他分析技术不同,同伦分析方法在选择所谓的哈里斯流体的Sakiadis流:级数解时提供了很大的自由度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reliability of Intrinsic Viscosity Estimated by Single Point Procedure at High Concentrations Crystal Growth and Viscosity Behaviors of Ammonium Alum Hydrate Solution with PVA in Shear Flow Thermal Expansion Behavior of Antiplasticized Polycarbonate Dielectric and Viscoelastic Behavior of Low-M Linear Polyisoprene Blended in Long Matrix Sakiadis Flow of Harris Fluids: a Series-Solution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1