A Call for Research at the Public Policy–Marketing Strategy Interface

IF 5.1 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Public Policy & Marketing Pub Date : 2022-06-10 DOI:10.1177/07439156221092413
Natalie Chisam, Frank Germann, Robert W. Palmatier
{"title":"A Call for Research at the Public Policy–Marketing Strategy Interface","authors":"Natalie Chisam, Frank Germann, Robert W. Palmatier","doi":"10.1177/07439156221092413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public policy touches every aspect of a firm’s marketing practices; accordingly, research at the intersection of marketing strategy and public policy is critical. These two research domains have flourished over the past decades, and important theories and empirical findings have been developed. Yet, the two domains have largely advanced independently of one another, and with a few notable exceptions (e.g., Seiders, Flynn, and Nenkov 2022), the research at the interface between the two is limited. Public policy can be broadly defined as a “set of interrelated decisions taken by a political actor or group of actors concerning the selection of goals and the means of achieving them” (Jenkins 1978, p. 15). In turn, marketing strategy is an organization’s decisions “concerning products, markets, marketing activities and marketing resources in the creation, communication and/or delivery of products that offer value to customers” and thus enables the organization to achieve objectives (Varadarajan 2010). Marketing strategy research, we contend, would greatly benefit from studying how decisions taken by a political actor or group of actors, including laws, regulatory measures, and other policies, impact and shape firms’marketing strategies. In particular, we believe that the areas of data privacy, health, corporate activism, and sustainability are ripe for research at that interface. In what follows, we briefly introduce these four areas and offer suggestions for future research.","PeriodicalId":51437,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Policy & Marketing","volume":"5 1","pages":"213 - 215"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Policy & Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156221092413","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Public policy touches every aspect of a firm’s marketing practices; accordingly, research at the intersection of marketing strategy and public policy is critical. These two research domains have flourished over the past decades, and important theories and empirical findings have been developed. Yet, the two domains have largely advanced independently of one another, and with a few notable exceptions (e.g., Seiders, Flynn, and Nenkov 2022), the research at the interface between the two is limited. Public policy can be broadly defined as a “set of interrelated decisions taken by a political actor or group of actors concerning the selection of goals and the means of achieving them” (Jenkins 1978, p. 15). In turn, marketing strategy is an organization’s decisions “concerning products, markets, marketing activities and marketing resources in the creation, communication and/or delivery of products that offer value to customers” and thus enables the organization to achieve objectives (Varadarajan 2010). Marketing strategy research, we contend, would greatly benefit from studying how decisions taken by a political actor or group of actors, including laws, regulatory measures, and other policies, impact and shape firms’marketing strategies. In particular, we believe that the areas of data privacy, health, corporate activism, and sustainability are ripe for research at that interface. In what follows, we briefly introduce these four areas and offer suggestions for future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共政策-营销战略界面研究的呼唤
公共政策涉及企业营销实践的方方面面;因此,研究营销策略和公共政策的交集是至关重要的。这两个研究领域在过去的几十年里蓬勃发展,并发展了重要的理论和实证研究结果。然而,这两个领域在很大程度上是彼此独立发展的,除了一些值得注意的例外(例如,Seiders, Flynn和Nenkov 2022),对两者之间界面的研究是有限的。公共政策可以被广泛地定义为“一个政治行动者或一群行动者就目标的选择和实现目标的手段所做出的一系列相互关联的决定”(Jenkins 1978,第15页)。反过来,营销战略是一个组织的决策“关于产品,市场,营销活动和营销资源的创造,沟通和/或交付的产品提供价值给顾客”,从而使组织实现目标(Varadarajan 2010)。我们认为,营销策略研究将极大地受益于研究政治参与者或参与者群体(包括法律、监管措施和其他政策)所做出的决策如何影响和塑造公司的营销策略。特别是,我们认为数据隐私、健康、企业行动主义和可持续性等领域已经成熟,可以在这个界面上进行研究。下面,我们将简要介绍这四个领域,并对今后的研究提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
15.40%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Policy & Marketing welcomes manuscripts from diverse disciplines to offer a range of perspectives. We encourage submissions from individuals with varied backgrounds, such as marketing, communications, economics, consumer affairs, law, public policy, sociology, psychology, anthropology, or philosophy. The journal prioritizes well-documented, well-reasoned, balanced, and relevant manuscripts, regardless of the author's field of expertise.
期刊最新文献
EXPRESS: Cultivating Sustainable Return Migration to Lebanon: Supporting Young Migrants through Marketing Systems Amidst Ongoing Conflict EXPRESS: Resourcing Hope: Refugee Agentive Consumption Acts in Protracted Displacement EXPRESS: Response Satisficing across Online Data Sources: Effects of Satisficing on Data Quality and Policy-Relevant Results Social Impact at Scale: Reflections on the Recommendations of the TCR Impact Task Force Commentary on “Transitioning to New Paradigms for Societally Impactful Research: Recommendations from the TCR Impact Task Force and an Agenda”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1