Politik Hukum Dispensasi Kawin: Membatasi Perkawinan Anak melalui Politik Batas Usia

Ashabul Fadhli, Rahmiati Rahmiati, Fathur Rahmi, Jelang Ramadhan
{"title":"Politik Hukum Dispensasi Kawin: Membatasi Perkawinan Anak melalui Politik Batas Usia","authors":"Ashabul Fadhli, Rahmiati Rahmiati, Fathur Rahmi, Jelang Ramadhan","doi":"10.32694/qst.v20i2.1560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to find out the dialectic of formulating the age limit for marriage which took place from the pre-independence period until the issuance of Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019 concerning Guidelines for Adjudicating Applications for Marriage Dispensation. The demand to determine the age limit was first voiced by the women's movement explicitly during the colonial period due to the large number of daughters being married off. Child marriage has been detrimental and has a bad impact on the lives of girls. This research is a normative legal research that uses a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and a historical (historical) approach. The results of this study prove that the formulation of the politically negotiated age limit after the independence period did not receive special attention by the Government. Interests in other matters concerning the approval of the Marriage Law are generally more important. The issue of the age limit has received a lot of criticism after Article 7 of Law No. 1/1974 on marriage was judged to be casuistic in terms of legal material and judicial practice. With the promulgation of PERMA Number 5 of 2019 it becomes the determinant of the legal vacuum regarding the application of the age limit rule and the process of adjudicating marriage dispensation cases by judges in the Religious Courts.","PeriodicalId":33705,"journal":{"name":"AlTADIB Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AlTADIB Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32694/qst.v20i2.1560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to find out the dialectic of formulating the age limit for marriage which took place from the pre-independence period until the issuance of Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019 concerning Guidelines for Adjudicating Applications for Marriage Dispensation. The demand to determine the age limit was first voiced by the women's movement explicitly during the colonial period due to the large number of daughters being married off. Child marriage has been detrimental and has a bad impact on the lives of girls. This research is a normative legal research that uses a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and a historical (historical) approach. The results of this study prove that the formulation of the politically negotiated age limit after the independence period did not receive special attention by the Government. Interests in other matters concerning the approval of the Marriage Law are generally more important. The issue of the age limit has received a lot of criticism after Article 7 of Law No. 1/1974 on marriage was judged to be casuistic in terms of legal material and judicial practice. With the promulgation of PERMA Number 5 of 2019 it becomes the determinant of the legal vacuum regarding the application of the age limit rule and the process of adjudicating marriage dispensation cases by judges in the Religious Courts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
婚姻豁免法:通过年龄限制限制孩子的婚姻
本研究旨在找出从独立前到2019年最高法院第5号《婚姻豁免申请裁定指南》颁布期间,婚姻年龄限制制定的辩证法。在殖民时期,由于大量女儿出嫁,妇女运动首次明确提出了确定年龄限制的要求。童婚是有害的,对女孩的生活产生了不良影响。本研究是一项运用成文法方法、概念方法和历史(历史)方法的规范性法律研究。这项研究的结果证明,政府没有特别注意在独立时期之后通过政治谈判制定的年龄限制。一般来说,与婚姻法批准有关的其他事项的利益更为重要。《1974年第1号婚姻法》第7条在法律材料和司法实践方面被认为是诡辩的,因此年龄限制问题受到了很多批评。随着2019年第5号PERMA的颁布,它成为宗教法院法官在适用年龄限制规则和裁决婚姻豁免案件过程中法律真空的决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
ANALISIS SURAT AL-MAIDAH AYAT 38 TENTANG PENERAPAN HAD POTONG TANGAN KASUS PENCURIAN PERSPEKTIF TAFSIR AL-MISHBAH DERADIKALISASI ATAS PEMAHAMAN AL-QUR’AN (ANALISIS SEMANTIK DAN KONTEKS HISTORIS TERHADAP AYAT-AYAT TENTANG JIH?D DAN QIT?L) KEARIFAN LOKAL DALAM TAFSIR TARJUMAN AL-MUSTAFID KARYA ABDUL RAUF AL-SINGKILI PENERAPAN HAD POTONG TANGAN PADA KASUS PENCURIAN (Analisis Surat Al-Maidah Ayat 38 Berbasis Hadis) AL-QUR’AN, REALITAS, SAINTISME, DAN PERSOALAN FILSAFAT ILMU: SUATU TINJAUAN RINGKAS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1