Sad delusions: The decline and rise of Greater Europe

Q1 Arts and Humanities Journal of Eurasian Studies Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1879366521999757
R. Sakwa
{"title":"Sad delusions: The decline and rise of Greater Europe","authors":"R. Sakwa","doi":"10.1177/1879366521999757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The end of the Cold War was accompanied by the idea that the fall of the Berlin Wall represented the beginning of the unification of Europe. Mikhail Gorbachev talked in terms of a “Common European Home,” an idea that continues in the guise of the project for a “Greater Europe.” However, right from the start, the transformative idea of Greater Europe was countered by the notion of “Europe whole and free,” whose fundamental dynamic was the enlargement of the existing West European order to encompass the rest of the continent. This was a program for the enlargement of the Atlantic system. After some prevarication, the enlargement agenda proved unacceptable to Moscow, and while it continues to argue in favor of transformation its main efforts are now devoted to creating some sort of “greater Eurasia.” There remains a fundamental tension between Atlanticist and pan-continental version of the post-–Cold War international order in the region. This tension gave rise to conflict and war: in 2008 (the Russo-Georgian War) and again from 2014 (Ukraine), and to what some call the Second Cold War. The continent is once again divided. However, pan-continentalism is far from dead, and although Greater Eurasian ideas have thrived, some sort of Greater European continentalism remains on the agenda. Is this, though, no more than a “sad delusion” or a genuine possibility?","PeriodicalId":39195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eurasian Studies","volume":"6 1","pages":"5 - 18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eurasian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1879366521999757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The end of the Cold War was accompanied by the idea that the fall of the Berlin Wall represented the beginning of the unification of Europe. Mikhail Gorbachev talked in terms of a “Common European Home,” an idea that continues in the guise of the project for a “Greater Europe.” However, right from the start, the transformative idea of Greater Europe was countered by the notion of “Europe whole and free,” whose fundamental dynamic was the enlargement of the existing West European order to encompass the rest of the continent. This was a program for the enlargement of the Atlantic system. After some prevarication, the enlargement agenda proved unacceptable to Moscow, and while it continues to argue in favor of transformation its main efforts are now devoted to creating some sort of “greater Eurasia.” There remains a fundamental tension between Atlanticist and pan-continental version of the post-–Cold War international order in the region. This tension gave rise to conflict and war: in 2008 (the Russo-Georgian War) and again from 2014 (Ukraine), and to what some call the Second Cold War. The continent is once again divided. However, pan-continentalism is far from dead, and although Greater Eurasian ideas have thrived, some sort of Greater European continentalism remains on the agenda. Is this, though, no more than a “sad delusion” or a genuine possibility?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可悲的错觉:大欧洲的衰落与崛起
冷战的结束伴随着柏林墙的倒塌代表着欧洲统一的开始的观点。米哈伊尔·戈尔巴乔夫(Mikhail Gorbachev)谈到了“欧洲共同之家”,这是一个以“大欧洲”项目为幌子的想法。然而,从一开始,“大欧洲”的变革理念就遭到了“欧洲整体和自由”理念的反对,“欧洲整体和自由”理念的基本动力是扩大现有的西欧秩序,以涵盖欧洲大陆的其他地区。这是一个扩大大西洋系统的计划。在一些推诿之后,扩大议程被证明是莫斯科无法接受的,尽管它继续主张转型,但它现在的主要努力是致力于创造某种“大欧亚”。在该地区,大西洋主义和泛大陆版的冷战后国际秩序之间仍然存在根本性的紧张关系。这种紧张关系引发了冲突和战争:2008年(俄罗斯-格鲁吉亚战争)和2014年(乌克兰战争),以及一些人所说的第二次冷战。欧洲大陆再次分裂。然而,泛大陆主义远未消亡,尽管大欧亚思想蓬勃发展,但某种形式的大欧洲大陆主义仍在议程上。然而,这仅仅是一种“可悲的错觉”还是一种真正的可能性?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Eurasian Studies
Journal of Eurasian Studies Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
In the shadow of war: Public opinion in the Baltic states, 2014 and 2021 The curious case of Aistija: Sidelights on Latvian–Lithuanian rapprochement during the 20th century Images of care: Marriage, family making, and the reproduction of the social order in Tajikistan Understanding the impact of social and academic factors on sense of belonging in higher education: A study from the Georgian educational landscape The effect of migration on economic and productivity growth in Russia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1