Bridging Between an Effective Economy and Environmental Protection Under the Lithuanian Constitution

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW Review of Central and East European Law Pub Date : 2023-08-07 DOI:10.1163/15730352-bja10082
Agnė Juškevičiūtė-Vilienė
{"title":"Bridging Between an Effective Economy and Environmental Protection Under the Lithuanian Constitution","authors":"Agnė Juškevičiūtė-Vilienė","doi":"10.1163/15730352-bja10082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn 1992, the Lithuanian Constitution created the preconditions for the stable and successful economic development of the state and laid down foundations for regulating economic relationships that ensure the predictability of economic, social, and legal relationships. The article analyzes how the concept of social justice as chosen by the drafters of the Constitution influences Lithuanian economic policy, as well as what foundations are consolidated in the Constitution for the economic system and freedom of individual economic activity. A brief study is presented in order to reveal the patterns of regulation of the Lithuanian economy in constitutional law, as well as the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court in relation to freedom of individual economic activity over the thirty years that the Constitution has been in force. Study of this jurisprudence shows that, in the first decade of restored Lithuanian independence, freedom of economic activity was particularly encouraged by the Constitutional Court, with the aim of creating the foundations for a market economy as soon as possible. Later, the main aim of the state was to ensure Lithuania’s energy independence, while in the third decade of independence constitutional jurisprudence increasingly analyzed the possibilities of finding a balance between environmental protection requirements and economic freedom. The second part of the article examines the constitutional foundations for environmental protection and the constitutional doctrine interpreting them; it is maintained that environmental protection can, in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution, be recognized as an important public interest, which may justify restrictions on freedom of individual economic activity; however, these restrictions must guarantee a balance between the two constitutional values of environmental protection and freedom of individual economic activity.","PeriodicalId":42845,"journal":{"name":"Review of Central and East European Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Central and East European Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-bja10082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1992, the Lithuanian Constitution created the preconditions for the stable and successful economic development of the state and laid down foundations for regulating economic relationships that ensure the predictability of economic, social, and legal relationships. The article analyzes how the concept of social justice as chosen by the drafters of the Constitution influences Lithuanian economic policy, as well as what foundations are consolidated in the Constitution for the economic system and freedom of individual economic activity. A brief study is presented in order to reveal the patterns of regulation of the Lithuanian economy in constitutional law, as well as the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court in relation to freedom of individual economic activity over the thirty years that the Constitution has been in force. Study of this jurisprudence shows that, in the first decade of restored Lithuanian independence, freedom of economic activity was particularly encouraged by the Constitutional Court, with the aim of creating the foundations for a market economy as soon as possible. Later, the main aim of the state was to ensure Lithuania’s energy independence, while in the third decade of independence constitutional jurisprudence increasingly analyzed the possibilities of finding a balance between environmental protection requirements and economic freedom. The second part of the article examines the constitutional foundations for environmental protection and the constitutional doctrine interpreting them; it is maintained that environmental protection can, in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution, be recognized as an important public interest, which may justify restrictions on freedom of individual economic activity; however, these restrictions must guarantee a balance between the two constitutional values of environmental protection and freedom of individual economic activity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
立陶宛宪法规定的有效经济与环境保护之间的桥梁
1992年,立陶宛宪法为国家稳定和成功的经济发展创造了先决条件,并为规范经济关系奠定了基础,确保了经济、社会和法律关系的可预测性。本文分析了《宪法》起草者所选择的社会正义概念如何影响立陶宛的经济政策,以及《宪法》巩固了经济制度和个人经济活动自由的哪些基础。为了揭示立陶宛在宪法中对经济的管制模式,以及宪法法院在《宪法》生效三十年来有关个人经济活动自由的判例,本文提出了一项简短的研究。对这一判例的研究表明,在立陶宛恢复独立的第一个十年里,宪法法院特别鼓励经济活动的自由,其目的是尽快为市场经济奠定基础。后来,国家的主要目标是确保立陶宛的能源独立,而在独立的第三个十年中,宪法学越来越多地分析在环境保护要求和经济自由之间找到平衡的可能性。文章的第二部分考察了环境保护的宪法基础和解释这些宪法基础的宪法理论;有人认为,根据宪法的规定,环境保护可以被认为是一项重要的公共利益,这可以证明限制个人经济活动自由是合理的;但是,这些限制必须保证环境保护和个人经济活动自由这两个宪法价值之间的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Review of Central and East European Law critically examines issues of legal doctrine and practice in the CIS and CEE regions. An important aspect of this is, for example, the harmonization of legal principles and rules; another facet is the legal impact of the intertwining of domestic economies, on the one hand, with regional economies and the processes of international trade and investment on the other. The Review offers a forum for discussion of topical questions of public and private law. The Review encourages comparative research; it is hoped that, in this way, additional insights in legal developments can be communicated to those interested in questions, not only of law, but also of politics, economics, and of society of the CIS and CEE countries.
期刊最新文献
Is Transparency Enough? Informal Governance Networks and the Selection Process of a Georgian Judge to the European Court of Human Rights Validity of Jurisdiction Clauses in Standard Terms and Conditions of International Commercial Contracts under Turkish Law Multiplication of Extraordinary Appeal Measures in Polish Criminal Proceedings: A Guarantee of Justice or Erosion of the Principle of Legal Certainty? Balancing Initial Copyright Ownership in Czech and Slovak Private International Law Accented Universality: Exploring Accountability as a Non-Translatable Concept in Central Asia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1