Leukocyte telomere length and mitochondrial DNA copy number association with colorectal cancer risk in an aging population

S. Malyutina, V. Maximov, O. Chervova, P. Orlov, V. Voloshin, A. Ryabikov, M. Voevoda, T. Nikitenko
{"title":"Leukocyte telomere length and mitochondrial DNA copy number association with colorectal cancer risk in an aging population","authors":"S. Malyutina, V. Maximov, O. Chervova, P. Orlov, V. Voloshin, A. Ryabikov, M. Voevoda, T. Nikitenko","doi":"10.36922/gtm.v2i1.184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we evaluated the association of blood leukocyte telomere length (LTL) and mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNA-CN) with the risk of incident colorectal cancer (CRC). We studied and followed-up a cohort of Russian men and women (aged 45 – 69 years, n = 9360, 54% female) from the HAPIEE study for 15 years. Using the nested case-control design, we selected cases with incident CRC among those free from any baseline cancer (n = 146) and sex- and age-stratified controls among those free from baseline cancer and cardiovascular disease and alive at the end of the follow-up (n = 799). We employed multivariable-adjusted logistic regression to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) of CRC per 1 decile of LTL or mtDNA-CN. We observed an inverse association of LTL and mtDNA-CN baseline values with the 15-year risk of incident CRC. Carriers of shorter telomeres had an increased 15-year risk of incident CRC with adjusted OR 3.2 (95% CI: 2.56 – 3.87, P < 0.001) per 1 decile decrease in LTL, independent of baseline age, sex, smoking, body mass index, blood pressure, lipid levels, and education. Similarly, lower mtDNA-CN was associated with the higher risk of incident CRC with adjusted OR 1.7 (95% CI: 1.12 – 1.89, P < 0.001) per 1 decile decrease in mtDNA-CN, independent of the aforementioned factors. Using the modified values of LTL and mtDNA-CN adjusted for multiple factors and their interactions with a case–control status, the ORs of CRC were 2.53 and 1.52 per 1 decile decrease in adjusted baseline LTL and mtDNA-CN, respectively. In conclusion, LTL and mtDNA-CN were independent inverse predictors of the 15-year risk of CRC in the Russian cohort. These findings highlight the relevance for subsequent research to exploit the mechanisms through which LTL and mtDNA-CN may reflect human health.","PeriodicalId":73176,"journal":{"name":"Global translational medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global translational medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36922/gtm.v2i1.184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the association of blood leukocyte telomere length (LTL) and mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNA-CN) with the risk of incident colorectal cancer (CRC). We studied and followed-up a cohort of Russian men and women (aged 45 – 69 years, n = 9360, 54% female) from the HAPIEE study for 15 years. Using the nested case-control design, we selected cases with incident CRC among those free from any baseline cancer (n = 146) and sex- and age-stratified controls among those free from baseline cancer and cardiovascular disease and alive at the end of the follow-up (n = 799). We employed multivariable-adjusted logistic regression to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) of CRC per 1 decile of LTL or mtDNA-CN. We observed an inverse association of LTL and mtDNA-CN baseline values with the 15-year risk of incident CRC. Carriers of shorter telomeres had an increased 15-year risk of incident CRC with adjusted OR 3.2 (95% CI: 2.56 – 3.87, P < 0.001) per 1 decile decrease in LTL, independent of baseline age, sex, smoking, body mass index, blood pressure, lipid levels, and education. Similarly, lower mtDNA-CN was associated with the higher risk of incident CRC with adjusted OR 1.7 (95% CI: 1.12 – 1.89, P < 0.001) per 1 decile decrease in mtDNA-CN, independent of the aforementioned factors. Using the modified values of LTL and mtDNA-CN adjusted for multiple factors and their interactions with a case–control status, the ORs of CRC were 2.53 and 1.52 per 1 decile decrease in adjusted baseline LTL and mtDNA-CN, respectively. In conclusion, LTL and mtDNA-CN were independent inverse predictors of the 15-year risk of CRC in the Russian cohort. These findings highlight the relevance for subsequent research to exploit the mechanisms through which LTL and mtDNA-CN may reflect human health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人群中白细胞端粒长度和线粒体DNA拷贝数与结直肠癌风险的关系
在这项研究中,我们评估了血液白细胞端粒长度(LTL)和线粒体DNA拷贝数(mtDNA-CN)与结直肠癌(CRC)发生风险的关系。我们对来自HAPIEE研究的一组俄罗斯男性和女性(年龄45 - 69岁,n = 9360,其中54%为女性)进行了15年的研究和随访。采用嵌套病例-对照设计,我们在无任何基线癌症的患者中选择了CRC事件病例(n = 146),在无基线癌症和心血管疾病且随访结束时存活的患者中选择了按性别和年龄分层的对照组(n = 799)。我们采用多变量调整逻辑回归来估计每1十分位LTL或mtDNA-CN的CRC的优势比(ORs)。我们观察到LTL和mtDNA-CN基线值与15年发生CRC的风险呈负相关。端粒较短的携带者15年发生结直肠癌的风险增加,LTL每降低1个十分位数调整后的OR为3.2 (95% CI: 2.56 - 3.87, P < 0.001),与基线年龄、性别、吸烟、体重指数、血压、血脂水平和教育程度无关。同样,较低的mtDNA-CN与较高的CRC发生风险相关,mtDNA-CN每降低1十分位调整OR为1.7 (95% CI: 1.12 - 1.89, P < 0.001),独立于上述因素。根据调整后的LTL和mtDNA-CN的修正值及其与病例对照状态的相互作用,调整后的基线LTL和mtDNA-CN每降低1十分位数,CRC的or分别为2.53和1.52。总之,LTL和mtDNA-CN是俄罗斯队列中15年CRC风险的独立负向预测因子。这些发现突出了后续研究的相关性,即利用LTL和mtDNA-CN可能反映人类健康的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cardiac regenerative therapy using induced pluripotent stem cells Hesperetin alleviates pulmonary injury in a blunt chest trauma-induced pulmonary contusion model in rats Recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB-soaked gelatin sponge reduces patient pain in palatal graft donor sites Omicron or no longer omicron: That is the question Targeted detection of Barrett’s neoplasia: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1