Retrospective Observational Study of Organophosphate Poisoning in an Urban Malaysian Hospital

R. Sivaganabalan, Z. MohdJamin, Loke Ky, N. Z'aba, S. Periathamby, Mohd Abdul Kader Jailani Mf
{"title":"Retrospective Observational Study of Organophosphate Poisoning in an Urban Malaysian Hospital","authors":"R. Sivaganabalan, Z. MohdJamin, Loke Ky, N. Z'aba, S. Periathamby, Mohd Abdul Kader Jailani Mf","doi":"10.4172/2161-0495.1000378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The objective of this study is to determine treatment interventions that provided the best outcome for patients. Initial treatment interventions performed in the emergency department such as decontamination, antidote administration and intubation will be analysed. Subsequent management in the intensive care unit with complications related to invasive ventilation will be analysed. The risks of aspiration pneumonia for patients who underwent gastric lavage with or without administration of activated charcoal will also be analysed.Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted. Study population included all patients presenting to the emergency department of Hospital Tengku Ampuan Rahimah with history of having consumed an organophosphate from the 1st April 2013 to 31st March 2016. The inclusion criteria was all patients with history of ingesting an insecticide containing a suspected organophosphate. The exclusion criteria was patients confirmed not to have ingested an organophosphate from clinical inference and confirmation of actual poison.Results: A total of 84 patients were sampled with 75 patients fulfilling criteria for study inclusion. A total of 22 cases developed complications during their hospital stay with 13 cases of nosocomial infection, 8 cases of aspiration pneumonia, 2 cases with in hospital cardiac arrest and 1 case of atropine toxicity.Malathion and chlorpyrifos were the only two identified organophosphates with the remaining 38 having consumed an unidentified organophosphate. Using chi-square test, there appears to be a significant difference between chlorpyrifos and malathion in terms of need for intubation with a p value of 0.017.Conclusion: Resuscitation of airway, breathing and circulation with close observation for early signs of proximal muscle weakness or paralysis countered with judicious atropine administration is sufficient to ensure good outcome for cases of malathion and chlorpyrifos poisoning which present early to the emergency department.The risk of aspiration pneumonia is high in patients with organophosphate poisoning outweighing the benefits of performing a gastric lavage. Aspiration of stomach contents with a ryle's tube after endotracheal intubation is an acceptable method of gastrointestinal decontamination for patients who have consumed a large quantity of organophosphate.Pralidoxime may be beneficial in reducing the period of respiratory paralysis or weakness for chlorpyrifos poisoning but shows no clear benefit for malathion poisoning. The prolonged muscle paralysis seen in malathion poisoning weighs heavily on intensive care resources. Banning the sale of malathion may help reduce morbidity from prolonged ventilation as well as reduce the burden on intensive care resources.","PeriodicalId":15433,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Toxicology","volume":"20 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0495.1000378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study is to determine treatment interventions that provided the best outcome for patients. Initial treatment interventions performed in the emergency department such as decontamination, antidote administration and intubation will be analysed. Subsequent management in the intensive care unit with complications related to invasive ventilation will be analysed. The risks of aspiration pneumonia for patients who underwent gastric lavage with or without administration of activated charcoal will also be analysed.Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted. Study population included all patients presenting to the emergency department of Hospital Tengku Ampuan Rahimah with history of having consumed an organophosphate from the 1st April 2013 to 31st March 2016. The inclusion criteria was all patients with history of ingesting an insecticide containing a suspected organophosphate. The exclusion criteria was patients confirmed not to have ingested an organophosphate from clinical inference and confirmation of actual poison.Results: A total of 84 patients were sampled with 75 patients fulfilling criteria for study inclusion. A total of 22 cases developed complications during their hospital stay with 13 cases of nosocomial infection, 8 cases of aspiration pneumonia, 2 cases with in hospital cardiac arrest and 1 case of atropine toxicity.Malathion and chlorpyrifos were the only two identified organophosphates with the remaining 38 having consumed an unidentified organophosphate. Using chi-square test, there appears to be a significant difference between chlorpyrifos and malathion in terms of need for intubation with a p value of 0.017.Conclusion: Resuscitation of airway, breathing and circulation with close observation for early signs of proximal muscle weakness or paralysis countered with judicious atropine administration is sufficient to ensure good outcome for cases of malathion and chlorpyrifos poisoning which present early to the emergency department.The risk of aspiration pneumonia is high in patients with organophosphate poisoning outweighing the benefits of performing a gastric lavage. Aspiration of stomach contents with a ryle's tube after endotracheal intubation is an acceptable method of gastrointestinal decontamination for patients who have consumed a large quantity of organophosphate.Pralidoxime may be beneficial in reducing the period of respiratory paralysis or weakness for chlorpyrifos poisoning but shows no clear benefit for malathion poisoning. The prolonged muscle paralysis seen in malathion poisoning weighs heavily on intensive care resources. Banning the sale of malathion may help reduce morbidity from prolonged ventilation as well as reduce the burden on intensive care resources.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚一家城市医院有机磷中毒的回顾性观察研究
目的:本研究的目的是确定为患者提供最佳结果的治疗干预措施。将分析在急诊科进行的初步治疗干预措施,如消毒、解毒剂管理和插管。随后的管理在重症监护病房与有创通气相关的并发症将进行分析。还将分析是否使用活性炭进行洗胃的患者吸入性肺炎的风险。方法:采用回顾性观察研究。研究人群包括2013年4月1日至2016年3月31日在东姑阿姆普曼拉希玛医院急诊科就诊的所有有食用有机磷史的患者。纳入标准为所有有摄入含有疑似有机磷杀虫剂史的患者。排除标准是经临床推断和确认实际中毒后确认未摄入有机磷的患者。结果:共84例患者入选,其中75例患者符合纳入标准。住院期间发生并发症22例,其中医院感染13例,吸入性肺炎8例,院内心脏骤停2例,阿托品中毒1例。马拉硫磷和毒死蜱是仅有的两种鉴定出的有机磷,其余38人食用了一种鉴定不出的有机磷。采用卡方检验,毒死蜱与马拉硫磷在插管需求方面存在显著性差异,p值为0.017。结论:对早期出现近端肌无力或麻痹症状的马拉硫磷、毒死蜱中毒患者进行气道、呼吸和循环复苏,密切观察其体征,并合理使用阿托品,可确保其预后良好。有机磷中毒患者吸入性肺炎的风险很高,超过了洗胃的好处。对于摄入大量有机磷的患者,气管插管后用赖尔管吸胃内容物是一种可接受的胃肠净化方法。对毒死蜱中毒患者,哌拉西肟可能有利于缩短呼吸麻痹或虚弱的时间,但对马拉硫磷中毒患者无明显疗效。马拉硫磷中毒中出现的长时间肌肉麻痹严重影响重症监护资源。禁止销售马拉硫磷可能有助于减少长时间通气的发病率,并减轻重症监护资源的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Synergic Effects of Acupuncture and Clinical Lactulose Therapy on Opioid-Induced Constipation Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Secondary to Trastuzumab Emtasine Angelandrsquo;s Trumpet (Brugmansia suaveolens) Poisoning Presenting with Anticholinergic Toxidrome A Hydroxychloroquine-Related Acute Liver Failure Case and Review of the Literature In vitro Inactivation of SARS-Cov-2 by Povidone-Iodine In situ Gel FormingSolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1