Early Twenty-First-Century Literary Images from the Margins of the Russian (Orthodox) World

Q1 Arts and Humanities Entangled Religions Pub Date : 2023-02-09 DOI:10.46586/er.13.2022.10221
M. Lecke
{"title":"Early Twenty-First-Century Literary Images from the Margins of the Russian (Orthodox) World","authors":"M. Lecke","doi":"10.46586/er.13.2022.10221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe paper analyzes two artistic artefacts, one graphic reportage and one novel from and about post-Soviet Georgia, focusing on the problem of religious difference within Orthodox Christianity. In imperial history, the fact that Georgia is an Orthodox Christian country was employed by the Russian side to legitimate the Georgian Church’s inclusion into the Russian ecclesiastic hierarchy and, what is more, of Georgia into the Russian empire. Georgian Orthodoxy was thus at least partly and in certain periods denied its religious autonomy. This parallels other strategic renouncements of differences from the Russian side, as for instance in the contemporary usage of the concept “Russian World” that combines the claim of “unity in faith” with language use and cultural consciousness into a mobilizing nationalist trope. The analysis of Viktoria Lomasko’s travel feature about Georgia and of Lasha Bugadze’s documentary novel “A Small Country” shows how contemporary artists and writers reassess the question of Georgia’s religious heritage and its difference from the Russian religious heritage. Whereas Lomasko is critical of the Georgian Church’s moral authority, she also gives ample room for presenting Georgian Orthdoxy’s difference as advantageous with regard to the Russian Church. Bugadze, by contrast, scrutinizes the Georgian Church’s fatal entanglement with the state that engendered both, nationalism and an uncanny allegiance with Russia. \n","PeriodicalId":36421,"journal":{"name":"Entangled Religions","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entangled Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46586/er.13.2022.10221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper analyzes two artistic artefacts, one graphic reportage and one novel from and about post-Soviet Georgia, focusing on the problem of religious difference within Orthodox Christianity. In imperial history, the fact that Georgia is an Orthodox Christian country was employed by the Russian side to legitimate the Georgian Church’s inclusion into the Russian ecclesiastic hierarchy and, what is more, of Georgia into the Russian empire. Georgian Orthodoxy was thus at least partly and in certain periods denied its religious autonomy. This parallels other strategic renouncements of differences from the Russian side, as for instance in the contemporary usage of the concept “Russian World” that combines the claim of “unity in faith” with language use and cultural consciousness into a mobilizing nationalist trope. The analysis of Viktoria Lomasko’s travel feature about Georgia and of Lasha Bugadze’s documentary novel “A Small Country” shows how contemporary artists and writers reassess the question of Georgia’s religious heritage and its difference from the Russian religious heritage. Whereas Lomasko is critical of the Georgian Church’s moral authority, she also gives ample room for presenting Georgian Orthdoxy’s difference as advantageous with regard to the Russian Church. Bugadze, by contrast, scrutinizes the Georgian Church’s fatal entanglement with the state that engendered both, nationalism and an uncanny allegiance with Russia. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
21世纪早期俄国(东正教)世界边缘的文学形象
本文分析了来自后苏联时代格鲁吉亚的两件艺术品,一件图像报告文学作品和一件小说作品,重点分析了东正教内部的宗教差异问题。在帝国历史上,格鲁吉亚是一个东正教国家的事实被俄罗斯方面利用,使格鲁吉亚教会被纳入俄罗斯教会体系,更重要的是,格鲁吉亚被纳入俄罗斯帝国。因此,格鲁吉亚正教在某些时期至少部分地被剥夺了宗教自治权。这与俄罗斯方面在其他战略上摒弃分歧的做法类似,例如在当代使用“俄罗斯世界”这个概念时,它将“信仰的统一”的主张与语言使用和文化意识结合起来,成为一种动员民族主义的修辞。对维多利亚·洛马斯科关于格鲁吉亚的旅行专题和拉莎·布加泽的纪实小说《一个小国》的分析显示,当代艺术家和作家如何重新评估格鲁吉亚的宗教遗产问题,以及格鲁吉亚与俄罗斯宗教遗产的区别。尽管Lomasko对格鲁吉亚教会的道德权威持批评态度,但她也给出了充分的空间来展示格鲁吉亚东正教与俄罗斯教会的不同之处。相比之下,布加泽仔细研究了格鲁吉亚教会与国家的致命纠缠,这种纠缠产生了民族主义和对俄罗斯的不可思议的忠诚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Entangled Religions
Entangled Religions Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cursing Beyond the Grave: Imprecations and Jewish Funerary Culture in Antiquity Deconverted Hearts in a Deconverted Church Conversions to Shiʿism in Italy and Editorial Ventures Intuition, Rebellion and Tradition Reversion, Revival, Resistance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1