“Trust No One But Yourself”: William Gilbert’s Use of Experiment and Rejection of Authority, Reconsidered

Q1 Arts and Humanities Perspectives on Science Pub Date : 2022-07-15 DOI:10.1162/posc_a_00564
J. Luggin
{"title":"“Trust No One But Yourself”: William Gilbert’s Use of Experiment and Rejection of Authority, Reconsidered","authors":"J. Luggin","doi":"10.1162/posc_a_00564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract One of the most important components of early modern science was the experiment. Advocates of the “new sciences” used experiments as indisputable evidence in controversies with their opponents and as powerful arguments against authoritative texts. Among the first early modern scientific works to systematically and successfully use experiments as parts of the central argumentation is William Gilbert’s treatise De magnete (1600), in which the author sought to present a completely new theory of magnetism as an explanation of phenomena on earth as well as of the movements of heavenly bodies. Gilbert goes to great lengths to persuade his readers of the innovation of his nova et inaudita physiologia. For this, however, it did not suffice to present a startling number of experiments and advocate empirical investigation. This contribution will shed light on the surprising literary and rhetorical tools employed in the De magnete in questions of authority, which aided Gilbert in presenting his powerful and highly successful “New Physiology.”","PeriodicalId":19867,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Science","volume":"76 1","pages":"925-949"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract One of the most important components of early modern science was the experiment. Advocates of the “new sciences” used experiments as indisputable evidence in controversies with their opponents and as powerful arguments against authoritative texts. Among the first early modern scientific works to systematically and successfully use experiments as parts of the central argumentation is William Gilbert’s treatise De magnete (1600), in which the author sought to present a completely new theory of magnetism as an explanation of phenomena on earth as well as of the movements of heavenly bodies. Gilbert goes to great lengths to persuade his readers of the innovation of his nova et inaudita physiologia. For this, however, it did not suffice to present a startling number of experiments and advocate empirical investigation. This contribution will shed light on the surprising literary and rhetorical tools employed in the De magnete in questions of authority, which aided Gilbert in presenting his powerful and highly successful “New Physiology.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“除了你自己,谁也不要相信”:威廉·吉尔伯特对实验的运用和对权威的拒绝,重新思考
实验是早期现代科学最重要的组成部分之一。“新科学”的倡导者在与反对者的争论中使用实验作为无可争辩的证据,并作为反对权威文本的有力论据。最早系统地、成功地将实验作为中心论证部分的早期现代科学著作之一是威廉·吉尔伯特(William Gilbert)的论文《论磁学》(1600),在这本书中,作者试图提出一种全新的磁学理论,以解释地球上的现象以及天体的运动。吉尔伯特竭尽全力说服他的读者相信他的《新生与无声生理学》的创新。然而,要做到这一点,仅仅提出数量惊人的实验和提倡实证调查是不够的。这一贡献将揭示《论磁学》在权威问题上所使用的令人惊讶的文学和修辞工具,这些工具帮助吉尔伯特提出了他强有力的、非常成功的《新生理学》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives on Science
Perspectives on Science Arts and Humanities-History and Philosophy of Science
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Emancipation from Metaphysics? Natural History, Natural Philosophy and the Study of Nature from the Late Renaissance to the Enlightenment The Racialization of Killer Whales: An Application of Gene-Culture Coevolutionary Theory Preface: Virtual Entities in Science Conflicting results and statistical malleability: embracing pluralism of empirical results Between mind and body? Psychoneuroimmunology, psychology, and cognitive science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1