Practical Application of Tensor Model in Laminated Sand Shale Analysis

Aditya Ariewijaya
{"title":"Practical Application of Tensor Model in Laminated Sand Shale Analysis","authors":"Aditya Ariewijaya","doi":"10.2118/197208-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Correctly evaluating reservoirs with thin laminations can be challenging. From a conventional perspective, this type of reservoir is often considered to be nonpay because of its low resistivity. Tensor models help improve resistivity using horizontal (RH) and vertical (RV) resistivity measurements from triaxial induction logging tools. In the absence of triaxial advanced measurements of RH and RV, tensor model equations using a conventional openhole (triple combo data) can be used.\n This approach is based on rearranging the tensor model with the Moran-Gianzero equation and using several assumptions for unique cases. This method explains the workflow to calculate sand resistivity correctly using only openhole data as well as calculating the anisotropic shale resistivity that is often estimated from nearby shales. A mathematical method is preferred to obtain consistent results for anisotropic shale resistivity parameters to reduce calculation uncertainty. Sensitivity analyses are created to provide a sense of how these parameters affect the results on sand resistivity.\n For a vertical well where relative dip is close to zero, RSd can be calculated without knowing the RshV. The same equation provides a 10% error on RSd at VLam<10% and relative dip <10°. At a higher relative dip and anisotropic shale resistivity, a cubic equation with a new coefficient is proposed. Sensitivity analyses are made to compare a true RSd and calculated RSd with changing RshH and RshV variables. The model demonstrates that a 10% change on RshH could cause a 30% error on RSd at VLam of 10%, while changes in RshV only begins to affect RSd up to 30% at VLam 70%. Graphical and mathematical methods are proposed to help prevent misestimating the RshH and RshV. The graphical method is preferred when a complete data set for all relative dip is available, while the mathematical method is preferred when the data set is limited.\n Unique cases where the RSd can be calculated as well as demonstrations on how anisotropic shale resistivity parameters can be determined using only conventional openhole (triple combo) data are highlighted. The additional set of constraints on the iteration of the cubic equation represents an improvement of the previous study, whereas the proposed method to determine the RshH and RshV helps prevent estimation errors of these parameters and helps improve RSd calculation accuracy.","PeriodicalId":11328,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019","volume":"112 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/197208-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Correctly evaluating reservoirs with thin laminations can be challenging. From a conventional perspective, this type of reservoir is often considered to be nonpay because of its low resistivity. Tensor models help improve resistivity using horizontal (RH) and vertical (RV) resistivity measurements from triaxial induction logging tools. In the absence of triaxial advanced measurements of RH and RV, tensor model equations using a conventional openhole (triple combo data) can be used. This approach is based on rearranging the tensor model with the Moran-Gianzero equation and using several assumptions for unique cases. This method explains the workflow to calculate sand resistivity correctly using only openhole data as well as calculating the anisotropic shale resistivity that is often estimated from nearby shales. A mathematical method is preferred to obtain consistent results for anisotropic shale resistivity parameters to reduce calculation uncertainty. Sensitivity analyses are created to provide a sense of how these parameters affect the results on sand resistivity. For a vertical well where relative dip is close to zero, RSd can be calculated without knowing the RshV. The same equation provides a 10% error on RSd at VLam<10% and relative dip <10°. At a higher relative dip and anisotropic shale resistivity, a cubic equation with a new coefficient is proposed. Sensitivity analyses are made to compare a true RSd and calculated RSd with changing RshH and RshV variables. The model demonstrates that a 10% change on RshH could cause a 30% error on RSd at VLam of 10%, while changes in RshV only begins to affect RSd up to 30% at VLam 70%. Graphical and mathematical methods are proposed to help prevent misestimating the RshH and RshV. The graphical method is preferred when a complete data set for all relative dip is available, while the mathematical method is preferred when the data set is limited. Unique cases where the RSd can be calculated as well as demonstrations on how anisotropic shale resistivity parameters can be determined using only conventional openhole (triple combo) data are highlighted. The additional set of constraints on the iteration of the cubic equation represents an improvement of the previous study, whereas the proposed method to determine the RshH and RshV helps prevent estimation errors of these parameters and helps improve RSd calculation accuracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
张量模型在层状砂页岩分析中的实际应用
正确评价薄层储层具有挑战性。从传统的角度来看,这种类型的储层通常被认为是无产油的,因为它的电阻率很低。张量模型利用三轴感应测井工具测量水平(RH)和垂直(RV)电阻率,有助于提高电阻率。在没有RH和RV的三轴高级测量的情况下,可以使用常规裸眼(三重组合数据)的张量模型方程。这种方法是基于用Moran-Gianzero方程重新排列张量模型,并使用几个特殊情况的假设。该方法解释了仅使用裸眼数据正确计算砂层电阻率以及计算通常从附近页岩中估计的各向异性页岩电阻率的工作流程。为了减小计算的不确定性,建议采用数学方法对各向异性页岩电阻率参数进行一致性计算。灵敏度分析是为了提供这些参数如何影响砂电阻率结果的感觉。对于相对倾角接近于零的直井,可以在不知道RshV的情况下计算RSd。在VLam<10%和相对倾角<10°时,相同的公式提供了10%的RSd误差。在较高的相对倾角和各向异性页岩电阻率条件下,提出了一种新的三次方程。进行敏感性分析,比较真实RSd和计算RSd随RshH和RshV变量的变化。该模型表明,RshH的10%变化可能导致VLam时RSd的30%误差为10%,而RshV的变化仅在VLam时开始影响RSd的30%至70%。提出了图形和数学方法来帮助防止误估RshH和RshV。当所有相对倾角的完整数据集可用时,首选图形方法,而当数据集有限时,首选数学方法。文中重点介绍了可以计算RSd的独特案例,以及如何仅使用常规裸眼(三重组合)数据确定页岩各向异性电阻率参数的演示。对三次方程迭代的额外约束是对先前研究的改进,而本文提出的确定RshH和RshV的方法可以防止这些参数的估计误差,提高RSd的计算精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of bag-of-features (BoF) technique for weed management in sugarcane production Spraying deposits using different nozzles and application volumes for pest management of cotton at reproductive stage Opioid Prescription in Switzerland: Appropriate Comedication use in Cancer and Noncancer Pain Co-Development Aspects of Super Giant Reservoirs With Condensate-Rich Gas Cap Healing Total Losses and Establishing Well Integrity with Engineered Fiber-Based Lost Circulation Control Spacer During Primary Cementing in UAE Offshore
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1