Žižek and the Kantian gesture: Parallax and beyond

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY Enrahonar-Quaderns de Filosofia Pub Date : 2023-03-31 DOI:10.5565/rev/enrahonar.1423
G. Harman
{"title":"Žižek and the Kantian gesture: Parallax and beyond","authors":"G. Harman","doi":"10.5565/rev/enrahonar.1423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Early in his 1993 book Tarrying with the Negative, Slavoj Žižek asks contemporary philosophy to “repeat the Kantian gesture.” The implication is that (much like Plato did with the Sophists) Kant accepted the critique of metaphysics made by David Hume, affirming it in an unexpected positive sense. The analogous gesture for a would-be Kant in our time would be to accept deconstruction’s insistence on the contingency of meaning while treating contingency not as a failing, but as the very stuff of truth itself. For Žižek this is precisely what Jacques Lacan has already done, and this makes Lacan the pivotal thinker of our era. Yet as we follow Žižek’s pursuit of this theme in his recent article “The Parallax of Ontology” (an extract from his book Sex and the Failed Absolute), we catch sight of a new direction in Žižek’s thinking. His previous model of parallax in terms of two separate and irreconcilable realities seems to shift toward a new emphasis on the differential becoming of the two, rather than their paradoxical co-existence.","PeriodicalId":53829,"journal":{"name":"Enrahonar-Quaderns de Filosofia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enrahonar-Quaderns de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/enrahonar.1423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early in his 1993 book Tarrying with the Negative, Slavoj Žižek asks contemporary philosophy to “repeat the Kantian gesture.” The implication is that (much like Plato did with the Sophists) Kant accepted the critique of metaphysics made by David Hume, affirming it in an unexpected positive sense. The analogous gesture for a would-be Kant in our time would be to accept deconstruction’s insistence on the contingency of meaning while treating contingency not as a failing, but as the very stuff of truth itself. For Žižek this is precisely what Jacques Lacan has already done, and this makes Lacan the pivotal thinker of our era. Yet as we follow Žižek’s pursuit of this theme in his recent article “The Parallax of Ontology” (an extract from his book Sex and the Failed Absolute), we catch sight of a new direction in Žižek’s thinking. His previous model of parallax in terms of two separate and irreconcilable realities seems to shift toward a new emphasis on the differential becoming of the two, rather than their paradoxical co-existence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Žižek和康德式手势:视差和超越
在他1993年出版的《与否定作斗争》一书的早期,斯拉沃伊Žižek要求当代哲学“重复康德的姿态”。这暗示着(就像柏拉图对待诡辩家一样)康德接受了大卫·休谟对形而上学的批判,并以一种意想不到的积极意义肯定了它。在我们这个时代,一个想成为康德的人的类似姿态是,接受解构主义对意义偶然性的坚持,同时不把偶然性视为失败,而是将其视为真理本身的材料。对于Žižek来说,这正是雅克·拉康已经做过的,这使得拉康成为我们这个时代的关键思想家。然而,当我们跟随Žižek在他最近的文章《本体论的视差》(摘自他的书《性与失败的绝对》)中对这个主题的追求时,我们看到了Žižek思想中的一个新方向。他之前的视差模型是关于两个独立的、不可调和的现实,现在他似乎转向了一个新的重点,即两者的不同之处,而不是它们矛盾的共存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sartre y Genet: el mundo in/per-vertido Instituciones defectivas: un protocolo para la república Muñoz, Jacobo (2022). Crítica i veritat: Assaigs, ressenyes, converses (1980-2015) Vermeren, Patrice (2021). Le philosophe communeux: Napoléon La Cécilia, néokantien, philologue et général de la Commune de Paris Pineda Canabal, Aníbal (2021). Le concept de non-contemporanéité dans la philosophie d’Ernst Bloch
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1