Prevalence and Predictors of Cyberbullying in Middle and High School Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic

I. Borualogo, Hedi Wahyudi, Sulisworo Kusdiyati
{"title":"Prevalence and Predictors of Cyberbullying in Middle and High School Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"I. Borualogo, Hedi Wahyudi, Sulisworo Kusdiyati","doi":"10.22146/jpsi.76494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Schools were closed during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the learning process has changed dramatically. Students spent countless hours online for learning and leisure activities and risked themselves by engaging in cyberbullying. This study aims are twofold: (1) to investigate the prevalence of cyberbullying perpetration and victimization during the COVID-19 pandemic, and (2) to investigate predictors of cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. A cross-sectional survey method was used in this study. This study used three questionnaires named Cyberbullying Perpetration and Victimization, Problematic Internet Use Questionnaire Short Form (PIUQ-SF-6), and Cyberbullying Attitudes Measure. Participants are middle and high school students (N = 3,752; 52.4% were girls, 81.6% were middle school students). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multivariate linear regression. Results showed that more students engaged in cyberbullying victimization than perpetration. Boys were more likely to engage in cyberbullying perpetration. Girls were more likely to engage in cyberbullying victimization. The most prevalent cyberbullying perpetration and victimization were posted mean or hurtful comments online. PIU, particularly more time spent online, harms both perpetrators and victims, as many as 3.4% for perpetrators and 4.5% for victims. Having fun teasing others online and feeling good attacking others online made the highest contributions to engaging in cyberbullying perpetration, as many as 10.9% and 10.1%, respectively. Do not accept harming others online and do not feel-good attacking others online, protecting the individuals from being cyberbullied as many as 4.2%. The attitude that school rules will be ineffective at stopping cyberbullying made the highest contribution to being cyberbullied, as many as 4.2%.","PeriodicalId":55655,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Psikologi","volume":"53 6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Psikologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.76494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Schools were closed during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the learning process has changed dramatically. Students spent countless hours online for learning and leisure activities and risked themselves by engaging in cyberbullying. This study aims are twofold: (1) to investigate the prevalence of cyberbullying perpetration and victimization during the COVID-19 pandemic, and (2) to investigate predictors of cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. A cross-sectional survey method was used in this study. This study used three questionnaires named Cyberbullying Perpetration and Victimization, Problematic Internet Use Questionnaire Short Form (PIUQ-SF-6), and Cyberbullying Attitudes Measure. Participants are middle and high school students (N = 3,752; 52.4% were girls, 81.6% were middle school students). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multivariate linear regression. Results showed that more students engaged in cyberbullying victimization than perpetration. Boys were more likely to engage in cyberbullying perpetration. Girls were more likely to engage in cyberbullying victimization. The most prevalent cyberbullying perpetration and victimization were posted mean or hurtful comments online. PIU, particularly more time spent online, harms both perpetrators and victims, as many as 3.4% for perpetrators and 4.5% for victims. Having fun teasing others online and feeling good attacking others online made the highest contributions to engaging in cyberbullying perpetration, as many as 10.9% and 10.1%, respectively. Do not accept harming others online and do not feel-good attacking others online, protecting the individuals from being cyberbullied as many as 4.2%. The attitude that school rules will be ineffective at stopping cyberbullying made the highest contribution to being cyberbullied, as many as 4.2%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病大流行期间初高中学生网络欺凌的患病率和预测因素
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,学校关闭,学习过程发生了巨大变化。学生们花了无数的时间在网上学习和休闲活动,并冒着生命危险参与网络欺凌。本研究的目的有两个:(1)调查2019冠状病毒病大流行期间网络欺凌犯罪和受害的发生率;(2)调查网络欺凌犯罪和受害的预测因素。本研究采用横断面调查方法。本研究采用网络欺凌行为与受害调查问卷、问题网络使用问卷简表(PIUQ-SF-6)和网络欺凌态度调查问卷。研究对象为初高中学生(N = 3,752;52.4%为女生,81.6%为中学生)。数据分析采用描述性统计和多元线性回归。结果表明,更多的学生参与了网络欺凌的受害行为,而不是犯罪行为。男孩更有可能参与网络欺凌行为。女孩更有可能成为网络欺凌的受害者。最普遍的网络欺凌行为是在网上发表刻薄或伤害性的评论。PIU,尤其是上网时间的增加,对犯罪者和受害者都有伤害,对犯罪者和受害者的伤害分别高达3.4%和4.5%。在网络欺凌行为中,以取笑他人为乐和攻击他人为乐的行为占比最高,分别高达10.9%和10.1%。不接受在网上伤害他人和在网上攻击他人感到不舒服,保护个人免受网络欺凌的比例高达4.2%。认为学校规则对阻止网络欺凌无效的态度是导致网络欺凌的最大原因,高达4.2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efektivitas Teknik To-Do List terhadap Time Management Mahasiswa Psikologi UIN Malang dalam Belajar HUSBAND SUPPORT, ADVERSITY QUOTIENT, AND ANXIETY OF PRIMIGRAVIDA THIRD-TRIMESTER PREGNANT MOTHERS THE UNTOLD STORY OF HAVING A FAMILY MEMBER AS TERROR CONVICT: STUDY OF FAMILY HARDINESS & FAMILY PERSPECTIVE Pengaruh Celebrity Worship Terhadap Perilaku Impulsive Buying pada Penggemar Pembeli Merchandise Jaemin NCT Dream Pengaruh Self-Esteem Terhadap Fear Of Missing Out (Fomo) pada Generasi Z Pengguna Media Sosial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1