Verbal prefixes in Old Northumbrian

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS NOWELE-North-Western European Language Evolution Pub Date : 2019-12-10 DOI:10.1075/nowele.00027.kru
William W. Kruger
{"title":"Verbal prefixes in Old Northumbrian","authors":"William W. Kruger","doi":"10.1075/nowele.00027.kru","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In late Old English dialects, adverbial elements are frequently morphologically ambiguous (independent words, clitics, verbal prefixes, etc.), and an important facet of the proper treatment of these items is the quality of source-data in different texts. This paper examines the usage of three adverbial/prepositional elements in the Northumbrian Lindisfarne Glosses: eft ‘again, after’, ymb ‘around’, and ofer ‘over’. Skeat (1871–87), whose transcription of the original manuscript is the primary reference for research on the Glosses, frequently transcribes these items as prefixes, alongside other OE prefixes like ge-, a-, for-, and be-. However, Skeat also deviates from this pattern in many cases, leaving their proper analysis uncertain. Nevertheless, various works (e.g., Cook 1894; Bosworth 2011), have indeed taken these items to be prefixes. I follow Fernandez-Cuesta (2016) in revisiting the original Lindisfarne manuscript to determine the correct treatment of these items, concluding that eft and ofer should not be analyzed as prefixes in the manuscript, while ymb should have prefix status.","PeriodicalId":41411,"journal":{"name":"NOWELE-North-Western European Language Evolution","volume":"177 1","pages":"192-219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NOWELE-North-Western European Language Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00027.kru","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract In late Old English dialects, adverbial elements are frequently morphologically ambiguous (independent words, clitics, verbal prefixes, etc.), and an important facet of the proper treatment of these items is the quality of source-data in different texts. This paper examines the usage of three adverbial/prepositional elements in the Northumbrian Lindisfarne Glosses: eft ‘again, after’, ymb ‘around’, and ofer ‘over’. Skeat (1871–87), whose transcription of the original manuscript is the primary reference for research on the Glosses, frequently transcribes these items as prefixes, alongside other OE prefixes like ge-, a-, for-, and be-. However, Skeat also deviates from this pattern in many cases, leaving their proper analysis uncertain. Nevertheless, various works (e.g., Cook 1894; Bosworth 2011), have indeed taken these items to be prefixes. I follow Fernandez-Cuesta (2016) in revisiting the original Lindisfarne manuscript to determine the correct treatment of these items, concluding that eft and ofer should not be analyzed as prefixes in the manuscript, while ymb should have prefix status.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
古诺森伯兰的动词前缀
摘要在晚期古英语方言中,状语成分在形态上经常是模棱两可的(独立词、副词、动词前缀等),而正确处理这些成分的一个重要方面是不同文本中源数据的质量。本文研究了Northumbrian Lindisfarne词典中三个副词/介词的用法:left ' again, after ', ymb ' around '和offer ' over '。Skeat(1871-87)对原稿的抄写是研究《gloses》的主要参考资料,他经常将这些项目抄写为前缀,与其他OE前缀一起,如ge-, a-, for-和be-。然而,Skeat在许多情况下也偏离了这种模式,使他们的正确分析不确定。尽管如此,各种作品(例如,Cook 1894;博斯沃思(Bosworth 2011),确实把这些项目作为前缀。我跟随Fernandez-Cuesta(2016)重新审视了Lindisfarne的原始手稿,以确定对这些条目的正确处理,并得出结论认为,在手稿中,left和offer不应该被分析为前缀,而ymb应该具有前缀的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
East Anglian English and the Langue de jearse and dow Der Rökstein im ökokritischen Trend Lost in transition Linguistic terminology in Swedish and Danish with comparison of Icelandic The inflection of Latin masculine proper names in The Old English Martyrology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1