{"title":"Tatala ‘a e Koloa ‘o e To’utangata Tonga: A way to disrupt and decolonise doctoral research","authors":"D. Fa’avae","doi":"10.20507/maijournal.2019.8.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Disruption” and “decolonisation” are terms often associated with Indigenous researchers’ intent to validate traditional cultural knowledge and practice in academia. The challenges and complexities in Indigenous researchers’ positionalities within their doctoral research projects are not always openly discussed (Webber, 2009). In this article, I share my personal reflections and observations of the challenges in my doctoral research with Tongan käinga (extended families) in Aotearoa New Zealand and Tonga. I highlight “Tatala ’a e Koloa ’o e To’utangata Tonga i Aotearoa mo Tonga”, a research framework drawn from an Indigenous paradigm that governs the knowledge and actions of three to’utangata Tonga (generations of Tongan males) as well as my own activities as the researcher within the community. Interrogating and highlighting the challenges linked to my attempts to validate and legitimate Tongan cultural knowledge in the university setting is delineated by my positionality within the Tongan community in Aotearoa and Tonga, with other Indigenous researchers, and the ways in which I negotiate the boundaries between the traditional cultural world and academia.","PeriodicalId":36901,"journal":{"name":"MAI Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MAI Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20507/maijournal.2019.8.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
“Disruption” and “decolonisation” are terms often associated with Indigenous researchers’ intent to validate traditional cultural knowledge and practice in academia. The challenges and complexities in Indigenous researchers’ positionalities within their doctoral research projects are not always openly discussed (Webber, 2009). In this article, I share my personal reflections and observations of the challenges in my doctoral research with Tongan käinga (extended families) in Aotearoa New Zealand and Tonga. I highlight “Tatala ’a e Koloa ’o e To’utangata Tonga i Aotearoa mo Tonga”, a research framework drawn from an Indigenous paradigm that governs the knowledge and actions of three to’utangata Tonga (generations of Tongan males) as well as my own activities as the researcher within the community. Interrogating and highlighting the challenges linked to my attempts to validate and legitimate Tongan cultural knowledge in the university setting is delineated by my positionality within the Tongan community in Aotearoa and Tonga, with other Indigenous researchers, and the ways in which I negotiate the boundaries between the traditional cultural world and academia.
Tatala ' a e Koloa ' o e To ' utangata Tonga:一种破坏和非殖民化博士研究的方法
“破坏”和“去殖民化”通常与土著研究人员在学术界验证传统文化知识和实践的意图有关。土著研究人员在其博士研究项目中定位的挑战和复杂性并不总是公开讨论(Webber, 2009)。在这篇文章中,我将分享我在博士研究中对汤加käinga(大家庭)在新西兰和汤加的挑战的个人思考和观察。我强调“Tatala ' a e Koloa ' o e To ' utangata Tonga I Aotearoa mo Tonga”,这是一个从土著范式中汲取的研究框架,它管理着三代To ' utangata Tonga(汤加男性)的知识和行为,以及我自己作为研究人员在社区内的活动。我在奥特亚罗亚和汤加的汤加社群中,与其他原住民研究人员,以及我在传统文化世界与学术界之间谈判的方式,都描述了我试图在大学环境中验证和合法化汤加文化知识所面临的挑战。