{"title":"Organized Irresponsibility and Communities of Risk in a Pandemic","authors":"M. Pichlak","doi":"10.25162/arsp-2023-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines challenges that the global COVID-19 pandemic has created for responsibility frameworks and practices in law. Building on Ulrich Beck's account of the risk society, it argues that the basic qualities of COVID-19 related risks, when juxtaposed with the standard legal framework for responsibility, result in organised irresponsibility in law (OI). Also the most common legal response to current problems, namely liability shields and waivers, contribute to OI. As a result, the paper presents the case for the metamorphosis of the current responsibility framework. Conceptually speaking, the metamorphosis should be based on the commonality of risk experience - on 'shared risk communities'. Possible normative ('common but differentiated responsibility' principle) and institutional consequences (alternative compensation programmes) are discussed in terms of their potential to contribute to metamorphosis. © Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart 2022.","PeriodicalId":41477,"journal":{"name":"Archiv fur Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie","volume":"725 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv fur Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/arsp-2023-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
大流行中有组织的不负责任和风险社区
本文探讨了2019冠状病毒病全球大流行给法律责任框架和实践带来的挑战。在乌尔里希·贝克(Ulrich Beck)对风险社会的描述的基础上,报告认为,与COVID-19相关的风险的基本特征,与责任的标准法律框架并列,会导致有组织的法律不负责任(OI)。此外,对当前问题最常见的法律回应,即责任保护和免责,也会导致OI。因此,本文提出了当前责任框架蜕变的案例。从概念上讲,这种转变应该基于风险经验的共性——“共同风险社区”。可能的规范(“共同但有区别的责任”原则)和制度后果(替代补偿方案)根据其促进变态的潜力进行了讨论。©Franz Steiner Verlag,斯图加特2022。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。