Still no differences in the length or scope of primary and ambulatory care for Medicaid and commercial patients.

IF 5.2 2区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environment and Behavior Pub Date : 2023-07-14 eCollection Date: 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxad027
Leighton Ku
{"title":"Still no differences in the length or scope of primary and ambulatory care for Medicaid and commercial patients.","authors":"Leighton Ku","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxad027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many seek to improve the quality of primary care in the United States, particularly for Medicaid patients. This paper revisits the question of whether Medicaid patients receive less primary care, such as the length or scope of services per visit, than commercial patients. Analyses of 2016-2019 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data, the most recent available, find there were no significant differences in the average length of ambulatory care visits, or of primary care visits in particular, between Medicaid and commercial care, nor differences in the scope, based on the number of diagnostic and treatment services, health education topics covered, or the number of medications prescribed in the visit. Only small differences were found for uninsured patients. The duration and scope of ambulatory and primary care visits were primarily related to the characteristics of patients, visits, and the physicians' practices. To improve primary and ambulatory care for disadvantaged patients, it may be more important to focus on increasing access to care by reducing insurance and cost-related barriers and on broad-based efforts to improve quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":48374,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Behavior","volume":"35 1","pages":"qxad027"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10986203/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxad027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many seek to improve the quality of primary care in the United States, particularly for Medicaid patients. This paper revisits the question of whether Medicaid patients receive less primary care, such as the length or scope of services per visit, than commercial patients. Analyses of 2016-2019 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data, the most recent available, find there were no significant differences in the average length of ambulatory care visits, or of primary care visits in particular, between Medicaid and commercial care, nor differences in the scope, based on the number of diagnostic and treatment services, health education topics covered, or the number of medications prescribed in the visit. Only small differences were found for uninsured patients. The duration and scope of ambulatory and primary care visits were primarily related to the characteristics of patients, visits, and the physicians' practices. To improve primary and ambulatory care for disadvantaged patients, it may be more important to focus on increasing access to care by reducing insurance and cost-related barriers and on broad-based efforts to improve quality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗补助和商业病人的初级和非住院治疗的时间和范围仍无差异。
许多人都在寻求提高美国初级医疗的质量,尤其是医疗补助患者的质量。本文重新探讨了医疗补助患者接受的初级医疗服务(如每次就诊的时间或服务范围)是否少于商业患者的问题。对 2016-2019 年全国非住院医疗护理调查数据(最新可用数据)的分析发现,医疗补助和商业医疗在非住院医疗就诊的平均时长,特别是初级医疗就诊的平均时长方面没有显著差异,根据诊断和治疗服务的数量、涵盖的健康教育主题或就诊中开出的药物数量,在范围方面也没有差异。在未参保的患者中只发现了很小的差异。门诊和初级保健就诊的持续时间和范围主要与患者、就诊和医生的执业特点有关。要改善弱势患者的初级和非住院医疗服务,更重要的可能是通过减少与保险和费用相关的障碍来提高医疗服务的可及性,以及通过广泛的努力来提高医疗质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Environment & Behavior is an interdisciplinary journal designed to report rigorous experimental and theoretical work focusing on the influence of the physical environment on human behavior at the individual, group, and institutional levels.
期刊最新文献
Cross-Cultural Applications of the New Ecological Paradigm in Protected Area Contexts Evidence on the Effectiveness-Acceptance Trade-Off Between Forced Active Choice and Default Nudging: A Field Study to Reduce Meat Consumption in Cafeterias Ecological Dominance Orientation as a predictor of Wildlife Value Orientations and Support for Lethal Wildlife Management Psychosocial Determinants of Lyme Disease Preventive Behavior Among Outdoor Recreationists Spatial Optimism and Cross-Over Effects in the Perceptions of Interconnected Wildfire, Flood, and Mudslide Hazards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1