Reducing Occupational Noise Propagated from Centrifugal Fan through Dissipative Silencers: A Field Study

IF 0.9 Q4 ACOUSTICS Sound and Vibration Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.32604/SV.2021.08930
A. Variani, Masoumeh Ghorbanide, S. Zare, Saeid Ahmadi, Zahra Hashemi
{"title":"Reducing Occupational Noise Propagated from Centrifugal Fan through Dissipative Silencers: A Field Study","authors":"A. Variani, Masoumeh Ghorbanide, S. Zare, Saeid Ahmadi, Zahra Hashemi","doi":"10.32604/SV.2021.08930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Acoustic performance of dissipative silencer was evaluated to determine the effectiveness of perforated duct porosity and absorbent material density in reducing occupational noise exposure propagated from centrifugal fan. Design charts were applied to predict noise reduction and length of a dissipative silencer. Dissipative silencers with various punched duct porosity (14%, 30% and 40%) and sound absorbent density (80 Kg/m, 120 Kg/m, and 140 Kg/m) were designed and fabricated. According to ISO9612 and ISO11820, noise level was measured before and after installing all nine test silencers at fixed workstations around the discharge side of a centrifugal fan in a manufacturing plant. On average, the noise level at the discharge side of a fan without silencer was measured to be 93.6 dBA, whereas it was significantly mitigated by 67.4 dBA to 70.1 dBA after installing all silencers. Dynamic insertion loss for a dissipative silencer with 100 cm length was predicted to be 27.9 dB, which was in agreement with experimental ones. Although, there was no significant differences between insertion loss of silencers, the one with 30% porosity and 120 Kg/m rock wool density had the highest insertion loss of 26.2 dBA. Dissipative silencers noticeably reduced centrifugal fan noise exposures. Increasing sound absorbent density and duct porosity up to a certain limit could probably be effective in noise reduction of dissipative silencers.","PeriodicalId":49496,"journal":{"name":"Sound and Vibration","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sound and Vibration","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32604/SV.2021.08930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acoustic performance of dissipative silencer was evaluated to determine the effectiveness of perforated duct porosity and absorbent material density in reducing occupational noise exposure propagated from centrifugal fan. Design charts were applied to predict noise reduction and length of a dissipative silencer. Dissipative silencers with various punched duct porosity (14%, 30% and 40%) and sound absorbent density (80 Kg/m, 120 Kg/m, and 140 Kg/m) were designed and fabricated. According to ISO9612 and ISO11820, noise level was measured before and after installing all nine test silencers at fixed workstations around the discharge side of a centrifugal fan in a manufacturing plant. On average, the noise level at the discharge side of a fan without silencer was measured to be 93.6 dBA, whereas it was significantly mitigated by 67.4 dBA to 70.1 dBA after installing all silencers. Dynamic insertion loss for a dissipative silencer with 100 cm length was predicted to be 27.9 dB, which was in agreement with experimental ones. Although, there was no significant differences between insertion loss of silencers, the one with 30% porosity and 120 Kg/m rock wool density had the highest insertion loss of 26.2 dBA. Dissipative silencers noticeably reduced centrifugal fan noise exposures. Increasing sound absorbent density and duct porosity up to a certain limit could probably be effective in noise reduction of dissipative silencers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用耗散消声器降低离心式通风机职业性噪声的现场研究
通过对耗散型消声器的声学性能进行评价,以确定孔管孔隙度和吸声材料密度对降低职业性噪声暴露的影响。设计图表应用于预测降噪和长度耗散消声器。设计和制作了不同孔隙率(14%、30%和40%)和吸声密度(80 Kg/m、120 Kg/m和140 Kg/m)的消声器。根据ISO9612和ISO11820,在制造工厂的离心风机排出侧周围的固定工作站安装所有九个测试消声器之前和之后测量噪声水平。在没有消声器的情况下,风扇排气侧的平均噪音水平为93.6 dBA,而在安装了所有消声器后,风扇排气侧的噪音水平显著降低了67.4 dBA至70.1 dBA。100 cm长度的耗散消声器的动态插入损失预测值为27.9 dB,与实验值基本一致。虽然不同消声器的插入损失没有显著差异,但孔隙率为30%、岩棉密度为120 Kg/m的消声器的插入损失最高,为26.2 dBA。耗散消声器明显减少了离心风扇的噪音暴露。将吸声密度和管道孔隙度提高到一定限度可能是耗散消声器降噪的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sound and Vibration
Sound and Vibration 物理-工程:机械
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sound & Vibration is a journal intended for individuals with broad-based interests in noise and vibration, dynamic measurements, structural analysis, computer-aided engineering, machinery reliability, and dynamic testing. The journal strives to publish referred papers reflecting the interests of research and practical engineering on any aspects of sound and vibration. Of particular interest are papers that report analytical, numerical and experimental methods of more relevance to practical applications. Papers are sought that contribute to the following general topics: -broad-based interests in noise and vibration- dynamic measurements- structural analysis- computer-aided engineering- machinery reliability- dynamic testing
期刊最新文献
Multi-Objective Prediction and Optimization of Vehicle Acoustic Package Based on ResNet Neural Network Research on Human-Vehicle-Road Friendliness Based on Improved SH-GH-ADD Control Introduction to the Special Issue on Perspectives on Soundscape and Challenges of Noise Pollution: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Sustainable Environmental Solutions Damped Mathieu Equation with a Modulation Property of the Homotopy Perturbation Method A Complete Analysis of Clarity (C50) Using I-SIMPA to Maintain Ideal Conditions in an Acoustic Chamber
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1