Radiation treatment dropouts-Pitfalls and solutions: A retrospective observational study

K. Patro, A. Avinash, P. Bhattacharyya, Venkata Reddy Pilaka, Mrutyunjayarao Muvvala, Mohanapriya Atchaiyalingam, Keerthiga Karthikeyan, Kaviya Lakshmi Radhakrishnan, M. Voonna
{"title":"Radiation treatment dropouts-Pitfalls and solutions: A retrospective observational study","authors":"K. Patro, A. Avinash, P. Bhattacharyya, Venkata Reddy Pilaka, Mrutyunjayarao Muvvala, Mohanapriya Atchaiyalingam, Keerthiga Karthikeyan, Kaviya Lakshmi Radhakrishnan, M. Voonna","doi":"10.4103/crst.crst_12_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Interruptions in radiation treatment are known to have a deleterious effect on oncologic outcomes,specifically, an increase in tumor recurrence and decrease in cancer cure rate. Objectives: Our primary aim was to determine the factors influencing radiotherapy interruptions and provide solutions to decrease these dropouts. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective observational study conducted between May 2009 and July 2010 at Mahatma Gandhi Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, a tertiary cancer center in Vishakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India, on patients with histopathologically proven cancer, who were receiving radiation, either as definitive concurrent chemoradiation or in the adjuvant or palliative setting. Before the start and during treatment, patients were counseled by radiation oncologists, radiation coordinators, and radiation therapy technologists. During radiotherapy, an interruption of more than five consecutive days was considered a treatment interruption. Following a treatment interruption, patients were called on the telephone, counseling was done, and the cause of the treatment interruption was recorded and attempts were made to resolve the problem. Results: We enrolled 1200 patients in the study. There were more male (n = 724 [60.4%]) than female (n = 476 [39.6%]) patients. The cohort included 379 patients (31.6%) with carcinoma of the head-and-neck and 301 patients (25.1%) with gynecological malignancies. There were 100 (8.3%) treatment interruptions recorded during the study period. The common causes of radiation interruption were radiation-induced toxicity (n = 20 [20%]), patient death (n = 15 [15%]), financial (n = 15 [15%]), and social (n = 12 [12%]) issues. After counseling over the telephone, treatment could be restarted in 25 (25%) of the 100 patients who had interrupted and stopped radiotherapy. Conclusion: Treatment interruption is relatively common in our patients receiving radiotherapy. To prevent such dropouts and increase compliance to treatment, adequate and frequent counseling before and during radiation treatment is needed.","PeriodicalId":9427,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Research, Statistics, and Treatment","volume":"7 1","pages":"224 - 231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Research, Statistics, and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/crst.crst_12_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Interruptions in radiation treatment are known to have a deleterious effect on oncologic outcomes,specifically, an increase in tumor recurrence and decrease in cancer cure rate. Objectives: Our primary aim was to determine the factors influencing radiotherapy interruptions and provide solutions to decrease these dropouts. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective observational study conducted between May 2009 and July 2010 at Mahatma Gandhi Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, a tertiary cancer center in Vishakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India, on patients with histopathologically proven cancer, who were receiving radiation, either as definitive concurrent chemoradiation or in the adjuvant or palliative setting. Before the start and during treatment, patients were counseled by radiation oncologists, radiation coordinators, and radiation therapy technologists. During radiotherapy, an interruption of more than five consecutive days was considered a treatment interruption. Following a treatment interruption, patients were called on the telephone, counseling was done, and the cause of the treatment interruption was recorded and attempts were made to resolve the problem. Results: We enrolled 1200 patients in the study. There were more male (n = 724 [60.4%]) than female (n = 476 [39.6%]) patients. The cohort included 379 patients (31.6%) with carcinoma of the head-and-neck and 301 patients (25.1%) with gynecological malignancies. There were 100 (8.3%) treatment interruptions recorded during the study period. The common causes of radiation interruption were radiation-induced toxicity (n = 20 [20%]), patient death (n = 15 [15%]), financial (n = 15 [15%]), and social (n = 12 [12%]) issues. After counseling over the telephone, treatment could be restarted in 25 (25%) of the 100 patients who had interrupted and stopped radiotherapy. Conclusion: Treatment interruption is relatively common in our patients receiving radiotherapy. To prevent such dropouts and increase compliance to treatment, adequate and frequent counseling before and during radiation treatment is needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放射治疗中途退出:陷阱和解决方案:一项回顾性观察研究
背景:已知放射治疗中断对肿瘤预后有有害影响,特别是肿瘤复发率增加和癌症治愈率降低。目的:我们的主要目的是确定影响放疗中断的因素,并提供减少这些中断的解决方案。材料和方法:这是一项回顾性观察性研究,于2009年5月至2010年7月在印度安得拉邦维沙卡帕特南的圣雄甘地癌症医院和研究所(三级癌症中心)进行,研究对象是组织病理学证实的接受放射治疗的癌症患者,无论是作为明确的同步放化疗,还是辅助或姑息治疗。在治疗开始前和治疗期间,患者由放射肿瘤学家、放射协调员和放射治疗技术专家提供咨询。在放疗期间,连续5天以上的中断被认为是治疗中断。在治疗中断后,会给患者打电话,进行咨询,记录治疗中断的原因,并尝试解决问题。结果:我们入组了1200名患者。男性724例(60.4%)多于女性476例(39.6%)。该队列包括379例头颈癌患者(31.6%)和301例妇科恶性肿瘤患者(25.1%)。在研究期间有100例(8.3%)治疗中断记录。辐射中断的常见原因是辐射引起的毒性(n = 20[20%])、患者死亡(n = 15[15%])、经济(n = 15[15%])和社会(n = 12[12%])问题。在电话咨询后,100名中断和停止放疗的患者中有25名(25%)可以重新开始治疗。结论:治疗中断在我院放疗患者中较为常见。为了防止这种退出并提高治疗依从性,需要在放射治疗前和治疗期间进行充分和频繁的咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
142
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Translation and validation of the Hindi, Marathi, and Bangla versions of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire: Anal Cancer (QLQ-ANL27) module: A prospective cohort study Translation and validation of the Hindi, Marathi, and Bangla versions of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire: Anal Cancer (QLQ-ANL27) module: A prospective cohort study The potential for further exploration of extramedullary spinal tumors in Iranian patients. Carcinoma cervix with scalp metastasis: An unusual case report Caregiving: A loving burden
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1