Grasping “the Disturbing”: The Confusing Coverage of a Shooting in a Monterrey Primary School

Q1 Social Sciences Comunicacion y Sociedad Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.26350/001200_000032
Alma Garcia, Beatriz Elena Inzunza Acedo
{"title":"Grasping “the Disturbing”: The Confusing Coverage of a Shooting in a Monterrey Primary School","authors":"Alma Garcia, Beatriz Elena Inzunza Acedo","doi":"10.26350/001200_000032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On January 18th, a shooting occurred in an upper middle class private school in the city of Monterrey, Mexico, by a 15 year old student of that institution. As soon as the news coverage started, it reported contradictory data mixing both formal and informal sources. The purpose of this article is to show the evolution of this coverage through the spatial frames given to the event during the first week after the incident, and reflect over the vulnerability that each frame has in making mistakes. This article analyzes the follow-up to the story in four news portals based on Iris and McComb’s categorization of the spatial (individual, community, regional, societal, international). A total of 275 articles were collected from four of the main local news portals, along with other national and international press articles. The main findings show that most mistakes were made at the individual level, due to the lack of official statements during the first hours after the shooting. Community and Regional frames were the most popular since they made the story relevant to a bigger audience, involving families, citizens and other social groups. The societal level was used mostly for opinion articles, where different political debates were raised and questioned regarding children’s mental health, weapons license, and new projects such as “Operacion mochila”, related to the backpacks checkups at schools. The growing need to be the fastest one to get things published, due to the immediacy of online mediums, pushes journalism to be unverified and careless. This causes a higher probability for mistakes or factual errors, as in this case, which are later echoed by other newspapers, channels and portals. One of the main conclusions calls for a reflection on the responsibility of local press, especially when they become the main source for national or international press.","PeriodicalId":35210,"journal":{"name":"Comunicacion y Sociedad","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comunicacion y Sociedad","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26350/001200_000032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On January 18th, a shooting occurred in an upper middle class private school in the city of Monterrey, Mexico, by a 15 year old student of that institution. As soon as the news coverage started, it reported contradictory data mixing both formal and informal sources. The purpose of this article is to show the evolution of this coverage through the spatial frames given to the event during the first week after the incident, and reflect over the vulnerability that each frame has in making mistakes. This article analyzes the follow-up to the story in four news portals based on Iris and McComb’s categorization of the spatial (individual, community, regional, societal, international). A total of 275 articles were collected from four of the main local news portals, along with other national and international press articles. The main findings show that most mistakes were made at the individual level, due to the lack of official statements during the first hours after the shooting. Community and Regional frames were the most popular since they made the story relevant to a bigger audience, involving families, citizens and other social groups. The societal level was used mostly for opinion articles, where different political debates were raised and questioned regarding children’s mental health, weapons license, and new projects such as “Operacion mochila”, related to the backpacks checkups at schools. The growing need to be the fastest one to get things published, due to the immediacy of online mediums, pushes journalism to be unverified and careless. This causes a higher probability for mistakes or factual errors, as in this case, which are later echoed by other newspapers, channels and portals. One of the main conclusions calls for a reflection on the responsibility of local press, especially when they become the main source for national or international press.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
把握“令人不安”:蒙特雷小学枪击案令人困惑的报道
1月18日,墨西哥蒙特雷市一所中上阶层私立学校发生枪击案,凶手是该校一名15岁的学生。新闻报道一开始,就报道了相互矛盾的数据,既有正式来源,也有非正式来源。本文的目的是通过事件发生后第一周的空间框架来展示这种报道的演变,并反映每个框架在犯错误时的脆弱性。本文基于Iris和McComb的空间分类(个人、社区、区域、社会、国际),分析了四个新闻门户网站对故事的后续影响。从四个主要的地方新闻门户网站以及其他国内和国际新闻报道中收集了275篇文章。主要调查结果表明,大多数错误是在个人层面上犯下的,因为在枪击事件发生后的最初几个小时内没有官方声明。社区和地区框架是最受欢迎的,因为它们使故事与更多的观众相关,包括家庭、公民和其他社会群体。社会层面主要用于发表评论文章,就儿童的心理健康、武器许可证以及与学校背包检查有关的" mochila行动"等新项目提出不同的政治辩论和质疑。由于网络媒体的即时性,越来越多的人需要成为最快发表文章的人,这促使新闻报道变得未经证实和粗心大意。这导致错误或事实错误的可能性更高,就像在这个案例中一样,其他报纸、频道和门户网站后来也做出了同样的反应。其中一个主要结论要求反思地方新闻界的责任,特别是当它们成为国家或国际新闻的主要来源时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Comunicacion y Sociedad
Comunicacion y Sociedad Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The historical coverage of televised media events in print media: The Case of the Eurovision Song Contest Framing China: The Belt and Road Initiative in Argentine national media outlets Personal Agenda-Public Agenda Congruency: A Contingent Condition for Agenda-setting Effects The Genesis and Self-Reliance of Indonesian Local Game Developers as the National Creative Workers in Contemporary Indonesia Crowdfunding in the production of video games in Spain: Evolution and success on Kickstarter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1