A comparative analysis of the profitability and technical efficiency of vegetable production under two farming systems in Nigeria

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Belgrade Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2298/JAS2101087O
O. Ogunmola, O. Afolabi, A. Adesina, A. K. Ilechukwu
{"title":"A comparative analysis of the profitability and technical efficiency of vegetable production under two farming systems in Nigeria","authors":"O. Ogunmola, O. Afolabi, A. Adesina, A. K. Ilechukwu","doi":"10.2298/JAS2101087O","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasing agricultural productivity enhanced by versatile production systems is critical for sustainable food security and economic development. The study aims to compare the profitability and technical efficiency of vegetable production and factors influencing the technical efficiency of vegetable production between inorganic and organic farming systems in Imo State, Nigeria. Primary data were collected using structured questionnaires comprising 100 vegetable farmers using a multistage sampling procedure. The budgetary analysis and stochastic production frontier model were used to estimate the profitability and the technical efficiencies of the enterprise. An average farmer realized N277,445.24 and N190,506.04 per hectare as profit from inorganic and organic vegetable production and can potentially earn N4.40 and N2.89 on every Naira invested, respectively. However, the inorganic farming system achieved significantly higher returns than the organic farming system. The mean technical efficiencies for organic and inorganic vegetable farmers were 89.57% and 75.64%, respectively. Farm size, labour and the quantity of seeds were the crucial factors that affected the technical efficiency under both farming systems. Also, age, years of education and farming experience were the significant variables that influenced the technical inefficiency of inorganic farmers, whereas years of education and household size significantly influenced the technical inefficiency of organic farmers. This study advocates for subsidized inputs for organic farmers to compensate for their lower yields and policies that would attract young people to vegetable farming to increase the production level.","PeriodicalId":14882,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Belgrade","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Belgrade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/JAS2101087O","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Increasing agricultural productivity enhanced by versatile production systems is critical for sustainable food security and economic development. The study aims to compare the profitability and technical efficiency of vegetable production and factors influencing the technical efficiency of vegetable production between inorganic and organic farming systems in Imo State, Nigeria. Primary data were collected using structured questionnaires comprising 100 vegetable farmers using a multistage sampling procedure. The budgetary analysis and stochastic production frontier model were used to estimate the profitability and the technical efficiencies of the enterprise. An average farmer realized N277,445.24 and N190,506.04 per hectare as profit from inorganic and organic vegetable production and can potentially earn N4.40 and N2.89 on every Naira invested, respectively. However, the inorganic farming system achieved significantly higher returns than the organic farming system. The mean technical efficiencies for organic and inorganic vegetable farmers were 89.57% and 75.64%, respectively. Farm size, labour and the quantity of seeds were the crucial factors that affected the technical efficiency under both farming systems. Also, age, years of education and farming experience were the significant variables that influenced the technical inefficiency of inorganic farmers, whereas years of education and household size significantly influenced the technical inefficiency of organic farmers. This study advocates for subsidized inputs for organic farmers to compensate for their lower yields and policies that would attract young people to vegetable farming to increase the production level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚两种耕作制度下蔬菜生产盈利能力和技术效率的比较分析
通过多用途生产系统提高农业生产力,对可持续粮食安全和经济发展至关重要。该研究旨在比较尼日利亚伊莫州无机和有机耕作系统之间蔬菜生产的盈利能力和技术效率以及影响蔬菜生产技术效率的因素。本研究采用多阶段抽样方法,对100名菜农进行结构化问卷调查。运用预算分析和随机生产前沿模型对企业的盈利能力和技术效率进行了评估。普通农民从无机和有机蔬菜生产中获得的利润为每公顷277,445.24奈拉和190,506.04奈拉,每投资奈拉分别可以获得4.40奈拉和2.89奈拉。然而,无机耕作系统取得了显著高于有机耕作系统的回报。有机和无机菜农的平均技术效率分别为89.57%和75.64%。在两种耕作制度下,农场规模、劳动力和种子数量是影响技术效率的关键因素。年龄、受教育年限和务农经验是影响无机农户技术效率低下的显著变量,而受教育年限和家庭规模对有机农户技术效率低下有显著影响。这项研究提倡为有机农民提供补贴,以弥补他们较低的产量,并制定政策,吸引年轻人从事蔬菜种植,以提高生产水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Belgrade
Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Belgrade Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sustainability and perspectives of the North Macedonian dairy industry Effect of compost with banana peel and Moringa leaf powders on seed yield and yield components of green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) Comparative evaluation of the productivity of winter crops (wheat [Triticum aestivum L.], rye [Secale cereale L.], triticale [Triticosecale Witt.]) in the western forest-steppe of Ukraine Nutritive value of field pea - oat and common vetch - oat bicrops Application of sodium selenite in the growing technology of white lupin (Lupinus albus L.)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1