The Evaluation Of Tibial Torsion Angle After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

G. B. Kürklü, Faik Özdengül, M. Çelebi, Ahmet Tugrul Bayrak, Z. I. S. Görmüş, Bülent Işık, A. M. Zergeroğlu
{"title":"The Evaluation Of Tibial Torsion Angle After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction","authors":"G. B. Kürklü, Faik Özdengül, M. Çelebi, Ahmet Tugrul Bayrak, Z. I. S. Görmüş, Bülent Işık, A. M. Zergeroğlu","doi":"10.15314/TSED.762117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction on tibial torsion angle (TTA) in the operated limb using computed tomography (CT) and physical examination methods and to show the relationship between post-operative muscle strength features and TTA by using isokinetic dynamometer. 21 patients between 18 and 36 years old (25.4±6.8) who underwent ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon (HT) autograft and then completed the ACL rehabilitation were included in this study. Isokinetic strength measurements were evaluated by Biodex-Multi Joint System-Pro 4 dynamometer. To evaluate TTA; CT, transmalleolar and thigh-foot angle (TFA) measurements were carried out. There was no significant TTA differences between 21 operated and non-operated knees for any method (p> 0.05). At the isokinetic evaluation to the extension direction there were a significant differences 60-180o/sec in peak torque value (p=0,0001, p=0,003) and average power value (p=0,004, p=0,002). As the percentage of losses in peak torque value to the flexion direction at velocity of 180 o/sec increases, the CT diagnosed angle difference between both knees increases. (p<0,01, r=0,548) As the percentage of losses in average power value to the extension direction at the velocity of 60 o/sec increases, the TFA difference between both knees increases. (p<0,01, r=0,563) . The isokinetic evaluation findings show that the strength loss between the knees increases the TTA differences. This finding shows the relationship of post-op rehabilitation with TTA varies and re-injury risk. In the isokinetic evaluation, subjects with high loss of strength in the direction of flexion at 180o/sec velocity had higher TTA differences, so rehabilitation protocols should be also focused on muscle endurance.","PeriodicalId":23380,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15314/TSED.762117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction on tibial torsion angle (TTA) in the operated limb using computed tomography (CT) and physical examination methods and to show the relationship between post-operative muscle strength features and TTA by using isokinetic dynamometer. 21 patients between 18 and 36 years old (25.4±6.8) who underwent ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon (HT) autograft and then completed the ACL rehabilitation were included in this study. Isokinetic strength measurements were evaluated by Biodex-Multi Joint System-Pro 4 dynamometer. To evaluate TTA; CT, transmalleolar and thigh-foot angle (TFA) measurements were carried out. There was no significant TTA differences between 21 operated and non-operated knees for any method (p> 0.05). At the isokinetic evaluation to the extension direction there were a significant differences 60-180o/sec in peak torque value (p=0,0001, p=0,003) and average power value (p=0,004, p=0,002). As the percentage of losses in peak torque value to the flexion direction at velocity of 180 o/sec increases, the CT diagnosed angle difference between both knees increases. (p<0,01, r=0,548) As the percentage of losses in average power value to the extension direction at the velocity of 60 o/sec increases, the TFA difference between both knees increases. (p<0,01, r=0,563) . The isokinetic evaluation findings show that the strength loss between the knees increases the TTA differences. This finding shows the relationship of post-op rehabilitation with TTA varies and re-injury risk. In the isokinetic evaluation, subjects with high loss of strength in the direction of flexion at 180o/sec velocity had higher TTA differences, so rehabilitation protocols should be also focused on muscle endurance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前交叉韧带重建后胫骨扭转角的评价
本研究旨在通过计算机断层扫描(CT)和体格检查方法探讨前交叉韧带(ACL)重建对手术肢体胫骨扭转角(TTA)的影响,并通过等速测力仪显示术后肌肉力量特征与TTA的关系。本研究纳入21例18 ~ 36岁(25.4±6.8)行自体腘绳肌腱(HT)重建并完成前交叉韧带康复的患者。等速强度测量采用Biodex-Multi Joint System-Pro 4测力仪进行评估。评估TTA;CT、踝外角和股骨足角(TFA)测量。21例手术膝关节与非手术膝关节的TTA在任何方法下均无显著差异(p> 0.05)。在向伸展方向等速评估时,峰值扭矩值(p=0,0001, p=0,003)和平均功率值(p=0,004, p=0,002)在60 ~ 180o/sec之间存在显著差异。当速度为180 o/sec时,随着峰值扭矩值损失在屈曲方向上的百分比增加,CT诊断的双膝角度差增大。(p< 0.01, r= 0.548)当速度为60 o/sec时,随着平均功率值对伸展方向损失的百分比增大,双膝TFA差增大。(p< 0.01, r= 0.563)。等速运动评估结果表明,膝盖之间的力量损失增加了TTA差异。这一发现显示了术后康复与TTA变化和再损伤风险的关系。在等速评估中,以180度/秒速度屈曲方向力量损失高的受试者TTA差异较大,因此康复方案还应关注肌肉耐力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Pilates Exercises Applied to Overweight and Obese Women on Body Composition Avrupa Birliği Erasmus+ Sport Projelerinin Analizi ve Türkiye ile Diğer Avrupa Ülkelerinin Karşılaştırılması SPOR EĞİTİMİ VEREN KURUMLARDAKİ AKADEMİSYENLERİN ÖRGÜTSEL SOSYAL SERMAYE, ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME VE ÖRGÜTSEL GÜVEN DÜZEYLERİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ The Examination of Communication Skills and Self-Efficacy of Coaches Examination Of The Doping Knowledge Levels Of Natural Sled Athletes İn Terms Of Some Variables
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1