Women Breaking the Silence over Violence: Revising Historiography through Sorayya Khan’s Novels

IF 0.1 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM Interdisciplinary Literary Studies Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.5325/intelitestud.25.1.0001
Urvashi Kaushal, P. Tripathi
{"title":"Women Breaking the Silence over Violence: Revising Historiography through Sorayya Khan’s Novels","authors":"Urvashi Kaushal, P. Tripathi","doi":"10.5325/intelitestud.25.1.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:The partition of British India in 1947 and the Bangladesh liberation war of 1971 witnessed violence that changed the cartography of the Indian subcontinent. This article explores a connecting thread between the history of violence during these epochal events and the commonality that both were followed by a conspicuous silence in the official historiography. It probes the disjuncture in the unreconciled history where silences corroborate official historiography and the unhealed wounds of victims of violence can be traced in the literary historiography produced by Sorayya Khan. This article is an analysis of her thematic choices and her treatment while writing about the victims of nationalist violence and its perpetrators. It examines her relentless effort to break this collective amnesia and silence of a society that witnessed, violated, massacred, and assaulted millions of its citizens to secure its borders. Her writing needs attention as it fills silent gaps in the historiography of Pakistan, and unlike most of the writers, she challenges the pervasive perception of men as heroic soldiers or perpetrators of violence and women as victims. She posits women as agents for breaking the silence over violence and thereby revises the official historiography.","PeriodicalId":40903,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies","volume":"5 1","pages":"1 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.25.1.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:The partition of British India in 1947 and the Bangladesh liberation war of 1971 witnessed violence that changed the cartography of the Indian subcontinent. This article explores a connecting thread between the history of violence during these epochal events and the commonality that both were followed by a conspicuous silence in the official historiography. It probes the disjuncture in the unreconciled history where silences corroborate official historiography and the unhealed wounds of victims of violence can be traced in the literary historiography produced by Sorayya Khan. This article is an analysis of her thematic choices and her treatment while writing about the victims of nationalist violence and its perpetrators. It examines her relentless effort to break this collective amnesia and silence of a society that witnessed, violated, massacred, and assaulted millions of its citizens to secure its borders. Her writing needs attention as it fills silent gaps in the historiography of Pakistan, and unlike most of the writers, she challenges the pervasive perception of men as heroic soldiers or perpetrators of violence and women as victims. She posits women as agents for breaking the silence over violence and thereby revises the official historiography.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
打破暴力沉默的女性:从索拉亚·汗的小说看史学的修正
1947年英属印度的分治和1971年孟加拉国解放战争见证了改变印度次大陆地图的暴力。这篇文章探讨了在这些划时代事件中的暴力历史和在官方史学中明显沉默之后的共性之间的一条联系线。它探讨了不和谐历史的断裂,沉默证实了官方历史编纂,暴力受害者未愈合的伤口可以在索拉亚·汗(Sorayya Khan)创作的文学史中找到。本文分析了她在描写民族主义暴力受害者及其肇事者时的主题选择和处理方式。它审视了她为打破这个社会的集体失忆和沉默所做的不懈努力,这个社会目睹、侵犯、屠杀和袭击了数百万公民,以确保其边界的安全。她的作品值得关注,因为它填补了巴基斯坦史学中沉默的空白。与大多数作家不同,她挑战了人们普遍认为男性是英勇的士兵或施暴者,而女性是受害者的观念。她假设女性是打破暴力沉默的代理人,从而修改了官方的历史编纂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Interdisciplinary Literary Studies seeks to explore the interconnections between literary study and other disciplines, ideologies, and cultural methods of critique. All national literatures, periods, and genres are welcomed topics.
期刊最新文献
Negotiating Demons of the Mind: Psychological Distress, Social Apathy and Victimhood in Tagore’s The Garden (Malancha) Discourse and Madness in Shadows in the Sun The Weather Is Dirty: Jane Austen’s Use of Nature as a Social Agent Women’s Dilemma of Love: An Ethical Literary Interpretation of Miss Sophie’s Diary by Ding Ling Improvisation in Jack Kerouac’s “Jazz” Writing: Intersubjectivity, Authenticity, and the Collectivist Utopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1