Socioeconomic determinants of suicide risk: Monroe County Florida Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey, 2016

Summer D. DeBastiani, Anne E. Norris, Alison Kerr
{"title":"Socioeconomic determinants of suicide risk: Monroe County Florida Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey, 2016","authors":"Summer D. DeBastiani,&nbsp;Anne E. Norris,&nbsp;Alison Kerr","doi":"10.1016/j.npbr.2019.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Socioeconomic factors have been linked to suicide, but little research has explored the effects of these determinants on suicide risk in US populations. This population-based study assessed socioeconomic determinants of suicide risk to inform suicide assessment and intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p><span><span>Secondary analysis of the Monroe County Florida 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey suicide </span>behavior questions among adult residents (</span><em>n</em><span><span><span> = 528). Univariate analysis and </span>logistic regression<span> assessed associations of self-reported socioeconomic status (education, employment, income, housing), health care access, </span></span>quality of life, substance use, mental illness and suicide risk.</span></p></div><div><h3>Result(s)</h3><p>Among respondents, 7.34% (n = 49, CI = 4.27–10.41) were at risk for suicide. Persons at risk reported more depression (χ<sup>2</sup> [1, <em>n</em> = 417] = 105.5, <em>p</em> =  .001), poorer mental health (χ<sup>2</sup> [2, <em>n</em> = 411] = 36.6, <em>p</em> =  .001), and more activity limitation due to health (χ<sup>2</sup> [1, <em>n</em> = 408] = 34.3, <em>p</em> =  .001) than those not at risk. Persons at risk were more likely to be renting homes (63.5%, <em>n</em> = 19, <em>CI</em> = 43.53–80.52) than persons not at risk (36.9%, <em>n</em> = 86, <em>CI</em> = 28.53–43.29).</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>32% missing data supports replication of study findings using larger data sets. Maximum likelihood estimation handled missing data in regression analyses. Low prevalence of suicide risk required collapsing some conceptually different categories.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion(s)</h3><p>Housing was a stronger socioeconomic predictor of suicide risk than income, employment, or education. This finding supports exploring housing status in suicide assessment and research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49756,"journal":{"name":"Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.npbr.2019.06.004","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0941950018303191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background

Socioeconomic factors have been linked to suicide, but little research has explored the effects of these determinants on suicide risk in US populations. This population-based study assessed socioeconomic determinants of suicide risk to inform suicide assessment and intervention.

Method

Secondary analysis of the Monroe County Florida 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey suicide behavior questions among adult residents (n = 528). Univariate analysis and logistic regression assessed associations of self-reported socioeconomic status (education, employment, income, housing), health care access, quality of life, substance use, mental illness and suicide risk.

Result(s)

Among respondents, 7.34% (n = 49, CI = 4.27–10.41) were at risk for suicide. Persons at risk reported more depression (χ2 [1, n = 417] = 105.5, p =  .001), poorer mental health (χ2 [2, n = 411] = 36.6, p =  .001), and more activity limitation due to health (χ2 [1, n = 408] = 34.3, p =  .001) than those not at risk. Persons at risk were more likely to be renting homes (63.5%, n = 19, CI = 43.53–80.52) than persons not at risk (36.9%, n = 86, CI = 28.53–43.29).

Limitations

32% missing data supports replication of study findings using larger data sets. Maximum likelihood estimation handled missing data in regression analyses. Low prevalence of suicide risk required collapsing some conceptually different categories.

Conclusion(s)

Housing was a stronger socioeconomic predictor of suicide risk than income, employment, or education. This finding supports exploring housing status in suicide assessment and research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自杀风险的社会经济决定因素:佛罗里达州门罗县行为风险因素监测调查,2016
社会经济因素与自杀有关,但很少有研究探讨这些决定因素对美国人口自杀风险的影响。这项基于人群的研究评估了自杀风险的社会经济决定因素,为自杀评估和干预提供信息。方法对佛罗里达州门罗县2016年行为危险因素监测调查中成年居民自杀行为问题进行二次分析(n = 528)。单因素分析和logistic回归评估了自我报告的社会经济状况(教育、就业、收入、住房)、医疗服务可及性、生活质量、物质使用、精神疾病与自杀风险的相关性。结果:7.34% (n = 49,CI = 4.27-10.41)的被调查者存在自杀风险。人报道更多的抑郁风险(χ2 [1,n = 417] = 105.5,p = 措施),贫困心理健康(χ2 [2 n = 411] = 36.6,p = 措施),和更多的活动限制由于健康(χ2 [1,n = 408] = 34.3,p = 措施)比不处于危险之中。有风险的人比没有风险的人更有可能租房(63.5%,n = 19,CI = 43.53-80.52)(36.9%,n = 86, CI = 28.53-43.29)。局限性:32%的缺失数据支持使用更大的数据集复制研究结果。最大似然估计处理回归分析中的缺失数据。自杀风险的低流行率需要打破一些概念上不同的类别。结论:住房是比收入、就业或教育更强的自杀风险的社会经济预测因子。这一发现支持在自杀评估和研究中探索住房状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research publishes original papers and reviews in biological psychiatry, brain research, neurology, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychoimmunology, psychopathology, psychotherapy. The journal has a focus on international and interdisciplinary basic research with clinical relevance. Translational research is particularly appreciated. Authors are allowed to submit their manuscript in their native language as supplemental data to the English version. Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research is related to the oldest German speaking journal in this field, the Centralblatt fur Nervenheilkunde, Psychiatrie und gerichtliche Psychopathologie, founded in 1878. The tradition and idea of previous famous editors (Alois Alzheimer and Kurt Schneider among others) was continued in modernized form with Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research. Centralblatt was a journal of broad scope and relevance, now Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research represents a journal with translational and interdisciplinary perspective, focusing on clinically oriented research in psychiatry, neurology and neighboring fields of neurosciences and psychology/psychotherapy with a preference for biologically oriented research including basic research. Preference is given for papers from newly emerging fields, like clinical psychoimmunology/neuroimmunology, and ideas.
期刊最新文献
Seizure and COVID-19: Association and review of potential mechanism Mental health research in the lower-middle-income countries of Africa and Asia during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review Acute changes in cerebral blood flow after single-infusion ketamine in major depression: A pilot study Depression and its association with quality of life among elderly: An elderly home- cross sectional study Quality of Thai media reporting of suicidal behavior: Compliance against the World Health Organization media guidelines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1