Memoria, verdad y justicia en la filosofía medieval: una visión general de las teorías más influyentes

C. Fernández
{"title":"Memoria, verdad y justicia en la filosofía medieval: una visión general de las teorías más influyentes","authors":"C. Fernández","doi":"10.19137/circe-2021-250206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This article presents some of the most influential philosophical insights on memory, truth and justice in the Christian Middle Ages. In all of them are present, in different proportion, the two mainstream traditions, Neoplatonism and Aristotelianism. St. Augus- tine, Avicenna and Thomas Aquinas incarnate perspec-tives increasingly deplatonized on memory. As for the concept of truth, both Augustine’s theocentric and Aquinas’s adequationist standards are expressions of a mainstream that declines in the XIV th century. Finally, while Augustine introduces critically Cicero’s definition of justice, rooted in the Greek-Roman theory of natural law, Aquinas coordinates systematically Christian the-ism, natural law and Aristotelian political naturalism.","PeriodicalId":33900,"journal":{"name":"Circe de Clasicos y Modernos","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circe de Clasicos y Modernos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19137/circe-2021-250206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: This article presents some of the most influential philosophical insights on memory, truth and justice in the Christian Middle Ages. In all of them are present, in different proportion, the two mainstream traditions, Neoplatonism and Aristotelianism. St. Augus- tine, Avicenna and Thomas Aquinas incarnate perspec-tives increasingly deplatonized on memory. As for the concept of truth, both Augustine’s theocentric and Aquinas’s adequationist standards are expressions of a mainstream that declines in the XIV th century. Finally, while Augustine introduces critically Cicero’s definition of justice, rooted in the Greek-Roman theory of natural law, Aquinas coordinates systematically Christian the-ism, natural law and Aristotelian political naturalism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中世纪哲学中的记忆、真理和正义:最有影响力的理论概述
本文介绍了中世纪基督教时期关于记忆、真理和正义的一些最具影响力的哲学见解。新柏拉图主义和亚里士多德主义这两种主流传统,以不同的比例出现在所有这些理论中。圣奥古斯丁、阿维森纳和托马斯·阿奎那所体现的观点,在记忆中日益去中心化。至于真理的概念,无论是奥古斯丁的神中心主义还是阿奎那的充分主义标准,都是十四世纪衰落的主流的表达。最后,奥古斯丁批判地介绍了西塞罗对正义的定义,该定义植根于希腊罗马自然法理论,而阿奎那则系统地协调了基督教的自然主义、自然法和亚里士多德的政治自然主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Del odio a la injusticia: la crítica a la práctica judicial ateniense en Sobre la verdad de Antifonte (fr. 44c) Construcción de sentido comunitario y orientación colectiva en la Ilíada ¿Dónde debo cantar? Autoridad, espacio y voz coral en Siete contra Tebas Raíces estoicas de la noción de fantasía en Ireneo de Lyon Lectura y predicación de los Salmos por Agustín: Lot y su familia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1