Metamodels for Evaluating, Calibrating and Applying Agent-Based Models: A Review

Bruno Walter Pietzsch, Sebastian Fiedler, K. Mertens, Markus Richter, Cédric Scherer, Kirana Widyastuti, M. Wimmler, Liubov Zakharova, U. Berger
{"title":"Metamodels for Evaluating, Calibrating and Applying Agent-Based Models: A Review","authors":"Bruno Walter Pietzsch, Sebastian Fiedler, K. Mertens, Markus Richter, Cédric Scherer, Kirana Widyastuti, M. Wimmler, Liubov Zakharova, U. Berger","doi":"10.18564/jasss.4274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The recent advancement of agent-based modeling is characterized by higher demands on the parameterization, evaluation and documentation of these computationally expensive models. Accordingly, there is also a growing request for “easy to go” applications just mimicking the input-output behavior of such models. Metamodels are being increasingly used for these tasks. In this paper, we provide an overview of common metamodel types and the purposes of their usage in an agent-based modeling context. To guide modelers in the selection and application of metamodels for their own needs, we further assessed their implementation effort and performance. We performed a literature research in January 2019 using four different databases. Five different terms paraphrasing metamodels (approximation, emulator, meta-model, metamodel and surrogate) were used to capture the whole range of relevant literature in all disciplines. All metamodel applications found were then categorized into specific metamodel types and rated by different junior and senior researches from varying disciplines (including forest sciences, landscape ecology, or economics) regarding the implementation effort and performance. Specifically, we captured the metamodel performance according to (i) the consideration of uncertainties, (ii) the suitability assessment provided by the authors for the particular purpose, and (iii) the number of valuation criteria provided for suitability assessment. We selected 40 distinct metamodel applications from studies published in peer-reviewed journals from 2005 to 2019. These were used for the sensitivity analysis, calibration and upscaling of agent-based models, as well to mimic their prediction for different scenarios. This review provides information about the most applicable metamodel types for each purpose and forms a first guidance for the implementation and validation of metamodels for agent-based models.","PeriodicalId":14675,"journal":{"name":"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.4274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

: The recent advancement of agent-based modeling is characterized by higher demands on the parameterization, evaluation and documentation of these computationally expensive models. Accordingly, there is also a growing request for “easy to go” applications just mimicking the input-output behavior of such models. Metamodels are being increasingly used for these tasks. In this paper, we provide an overview of common metamodel types and the purposes of their usage in an agent-based modeling context. To guide modelers in the selection and application of metamodels for their own needs, we further assessed their implementation effort and performance. We performed a literature research in January 2019 using four different databases. Five different terms paraphrasing metamodels (approximation, emulator, meta-model, metamodel and surrogate) were used to capture the whole range of relevant literature in all disciplines. All metamodel applications found were then categorized into specific metamodel types and rated by different junior and senior researches from varying disciplines (including forest sciences, landscape ecology, or economics) regarding the implementation effort and performance. Specifically, we captured the metamodel performance according to (i) the consideration of uncertainties, (ii) the suitability assessment provided by the authors for the particular purpose, and (iii) the number of valuation criteria provided for suitability assessment. We selected 40 distinct metamodel applications from studies published in peer-reviewed journals from 2005 to 2019. These were used for the sensitivity analysis, calibration and upscaling of agent-based models, as well to mimic their prediction for different scenarios. This review provides information about the most applicable metamodel types for each purpose and forms a first guidance for the implementation and validation of metamodels for agent-based models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估、校准和应用基于agent模型的元模型综述
基于智能体的建模的最新进展的特点是对这些计算昂贵的模型的参数化、评估和文档化提出了更高的要求。因此,对“易于操作”的应用程序的需求也在不断增长,这些应用程序只是模仿这些模型的输入-输出行为。元模型正越来越多地用于这些任务。在本文中,我们概述了常见的元模型类型及其在基于代理的建模上下文中使用的目的。为了指导建模者根据自己的需要选择和应用元模型,我们进一步评估了它们的实现工作和性能。我们在2019年1月使用四个不同的数据库进行了文献研究。五个不同的术语释义元模型(近似,模拟器,元模型,元模型和代理)被用来捕获所有学科的相关文献的全部范围。然后,所有发现的元模型应用程序被分类到特定的元模型类型中,并由来自不同学科(包括森林科学、景观生态学或经济学)的不同初级和高级研究人员对实现工作和性能进行评级。具体来说,我们根据(i)考虑不确定性,(ii)作者为特定目的提供的适用性评估,以及(iii)为适用性评估提供的评估标准的数量来捕获元模型的性能。我们从2005年至2019年发表在同行评议期刊上的研究中选择了40个不同的元模型应用。这些数据被用于基于主体的模型的敏感性分析、校准和升级,以及模拟它们对不同情景的预测。本综述提供了关于每种目的最适用的元模型类型的信息,并为基于代理的模型的元模型的实现和验证形成了第一个指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conflicting Information and Compliance with COVID-19 Behavioral Recommendations Particle Swarm Optimization for Calibration in Spatially Explicit Agent-Based Modeling The Role of Reinforcement Learning in the Emergence of Conventions: Simulation Experiments with the Repeated Volunteer's Dilemma Generation of Synthetic Populations in Social Simulations: A Review of Methods and Practices An Integrated Ecological-Social Simulation Model of Farmer Decisions and Cropping System Performance in the Rolling Pampas (Argentina)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1