Depression Symptom Patterns as Predictors of Metabolic Syndrome and Cardiac Events in Symptomatic Women with Suspected Myocardial Ischemia: The Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE and WISE-CVD) Projects

Nicole Virzi, David S. Krantz, V. Bittner, C. B. Bairey Merz, Steven Reis, E. Handberg, C. Pepine, V. Vaccarino, T. Rutledge
{"title":"Depression Symptom Patterns as Predictors of Metabolic Syndrome and Cardiac Events in Symptomatic Women with Suspected Myocardial Ischemia: The Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE and WISE-CVD) Projects","authors":"Nicole Virzi, David S. Krantz, V. Bittner, C. B. Bairey Merz, Steven Reis, E. Handberg, C. Pepine, V. Vaccarino, T. Rutledge","doi":"10.4103/hm.hm_35_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ischemic heart disease (IHD) risk in women includes biomedical, behavioral, and psychosocial contributors. The purpose of this study was to build upon previous research suggesting that in women, somatic symptoms (SS) of depression may be important to the development of IHD risk factors and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Based on previous findings, we hypothesized that: (1) SS would be associated with robust biomedical predictors of heart disease and functional capacity, while cognitive symptoms (CS) of depression would not, and (2) SS would independently predict adverse health outcomes while CS would not. Methods: We examined the relationships between symptoms of depression (SS/CS), metabolic syndrome (MetS), inflammatory markers (IM), coronary artery disease (CAD) severity, and functional capacity in two independent cohorts of women with suspected IHD. In the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE), we also examined these variables as predictors of all-cause mortality (ACM) + MACE over a median 9.3-year follow-up. The WISE sample included 641 women with suspected ischemia with or without obstructive CAD. The WISE-Coronary Vascular Dysfunction (WISE-CVD) sample consisted of 359 women with suspected ischemia and no obstructive CAD. All study measures were collected uniformly at baseline. Depressive symptoms were measured via the Beck Depression Inventory. MetS was assessed according to Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP-III) criteria. Results: In both studies, SS was associated with MetS (Cohen's d = 0.18, 0.26, P < 0.05, respectively), while CS was not. Within WISE, using Cox Proportional Hazard Regression, SS (Hazard ratio [HR] = 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01–1.15; HR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.00–1.13) and MetS (HR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.16–3.08; HR = 1.74, 95% CI=1.07–2.84) were independent predictors of ACM + MACE after controlling for demographics, IM, and CAD severity, while CS was not. Conclusions: In two independent samples of women undergoing coronary angiography due to suspected ischemia, SS but not CS of depression were associated with MetS, and both SS and MetS independently predicted ACM and MACE. These results add to previous studies suggesting that SS of depression may warrant specific attention in women with elevated cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Future research evaluating the biobehavioral basis of the relationship between depression, MetS, and CVD is needed.","PeriodicalId":73225,"journal":{"name":"Heart and mind (Mumbai, India)","volume":"19 1","pages":"254 - 261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart and mind (Mumbai, India)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/hm.hm_35_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Ischemic heart disease (IHD) risk in women includes biomedical, behavioral, and psychosocial contributors. The purpose of this study was to build upon previous research suggesting that in women, somatic symptoms (SS) of depression may be important to the development of IHD risk factors and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Based on previous findings, we hypothesized that: (1) SS would be associated with robust biomedical predictors of heart disease and functional capacity, while cognitive symptoms (CS) of depression would not, and (2) SS would independently predict adverse health outcomes while CS would not. Methods: We examined the relationships between symptoms of depression (SS/CS), metabolic syndrome (MetS), inflammatory markers (IM), coronary artery disease (CAD) severity, and functional capacity in two independent cohorts of women with suspected IHD. In the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE), we also examined these variables as predictors of all-cause mortality (ACM) + MACE over a median 9.3-year follow-up. The WISE sample included 641 women with suspected ischemia with or without obstructive CAD. The WISE-Coronary Vascular Dysfunction (WISE-CVD) sample consisted of 359 women with suspected ischemia and no obstructive CAD. All study measures were collected uniformly at baseline. Depressive symptoms were measured via the Beck Depression Inventory. MetS was assessed according to Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP-III) criteria. Results: In both studies, SS was associated with MetS (Cohen's d = 0.18, 0.26, P < 0.05, respectively), while CS was not. Within WISE, using Cox Proportional Hazard Regression, SS (Hazard ratio [HR] = 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01–1.15; HR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.00–1.13) and MetS (HR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.16–3.08; HR = 1.74, 95% CI=1.07–2.84) were independent predictors of ACM + MACE after controlling for demographics, IM, and CAD severity, while CS was not. Conclusions: In two independent samples of women undergoing coronary angiography due to suspected ischemia, SS but not CS of depression were associated with MetS, and both SS and MetS independently predicted ACM and MACE. These results add to previous studies suggesting that SS of depression may warrant specific attention in women with elevated cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Future research evaluating the biobehavioral basis of the relationship between depression, MetS, and CVD is needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抑郁症状模式作为疑似心肌缺血症状女性代谢综合征和心脏事件的预测因子:女性缺血综合征评估(WISE和WISE- cvd)项目
背景:女性缺血性心脏病(IHD)风险包括生物医学、行为和社会心理因素。本研究的目的是建立在先前研究的基础上,表明在女性中,抑郁症的躯体症状(SS)可能对IHD危险因素和主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的发展很重要。基于先前的研究结果,我们假设:(1)SS与心脏病和功能能力的强大生物医学预测因子相关,而抑郁症的认知症状(CS)不相关;(2)SS可以独立预测不良健康结果,而CS不能。方法:我们在两个独立的疑似IHD女性队列中研究了抑郁症状(SS/CS)、代谢综合征(MetS)、炎症标志物(IM)、冠状动脉疾病(CAD)严重程度和功能能力之间的关系。在女性缺血综合征评估(WISE)中,我们也检查了这些变量作为全因死亡率(ACM) + MACE的预测因子,中位随访9.3年。WISE样本包括641名疑似缺血伴或不伴阻塞性CAD的女性。wise -冠状动脉功能障碍(WISE-CVD)样本包括359名疑似缺血且无阻塞性CAD的女性。在基线时统一收集所有研究测量值。通过贝克抑郁量表测量抑郁症状。根据成人治疗组III (ATP-III)标准评估MetS。结果:在两项研究中,SS与MetS相关(Cohen’s d分别= 0.18、0.26,P < 0.05),而CS不相关。在WISE中,使用Cox比例风险回归,SS(风险比[HR] = 1.08, 95%可信区间[CI] = 1.01-1.15;HR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.00-1.13)和MetS (HR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.16-3.08;HR = 1.74, 95% CI= 1.07-2.84)在控制人口统计学、IM和CAD严重程度后是ACM + MACE的独立预测因子,而CS则不是。结论:在两个独立的因疑似缺血而接受冠状动脉造影的女性样本中,抑郁的SS而非CS与MetS相关,并且SS和MetS都独立预测ACM和MACE。这些结果与先前的研究相一致,表明抑郁症的SS可能需要特别关注心血管疾病(CVD)风险升高的女性。未来的研究需要评估抑郁症、MetS和CVD之间关系的生物行为基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Depression Symptom Patterns as Predictors of Metabolic Syndrome and Cardiac Events in Symptomatic Women with Suspected Myocardial Ischemia: The Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE and WISE-CVD) Projects. Depression Symptom Patterns as Predictors of Metabolic Syndrome and Cardiac Events in Symptomatic Women with Suspected Myocardial Ischemia: The Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE and WISE-CVD) Projects Somatic Versus Cognitive Depressive Symptoms as Predictors of Coronary Artery Disease among Women with Suspected Ischemia: The Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation. Inflammatory and vascular correlates of mood change over 8 weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1