Gas Reconciliation with Advance Error Reduction

Varun Nidhi, Rakesh Rao, Prakash Chhapolia
{"title":"Gas Reconciliation with Advance Error Reduction","authors":"Varun Nidhi, Rakesh Rao, Prakash Chhapolia","doi":"10.2118/197689-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Pipelines are the most economically viable mode of transportation for oil and gas. Every pipeline is monitored 24×7 using meters distributed across the pipeline. Flow, temperature and pressure meters are the most common and essential for continuous and efficient operation of pipelines. Like any other instrument these meters also have uncertainty and prone to error due to irregular calibration, drift, gross error and other such events. The overall accuracy of pipeline metering increases as the distance between consecutive meters decreases. It is also affected by the placement of meters at critical locations like pipeline tapouts, tapins and consumers points. Economics do not allow pipeline operators to install beyond a certain amount of metering assets.\n The complexity to efficiently calculate the product in and out of a gas pipeline is more compared to a liquid pipeline. It arises due to the high compressibility of gases compared to liquids. Gas pipelines operate at much higher pressure than oil pipelines. The trapped gas inside a gas pipeline can be called line pack of that pipeline. The line pack is very sensitive to two natural factors pressure and temperature of the pipeline. Oil pipelines carry one fluid at a time. Gas pipelines on the other hand carry several gases as a mixture. Unlike oil, gas billings are calculated as the energy the gas mixture carries to the consumer. Due to the mixture, gas composition is another essential factor to accurately calculate energy of the mixture.\n This paper discusses the challenges of calculating various transport factors and phenomena in gas pipelines and how methods like gross error correction and machine learning can be used to increase the accuracy. The results and conclusions are derived from the applications of these methods to natural gas transportation pipeline. Some of most important conclusions obtained were Understanding the pattern of on-field meter data with ideal meter provides insights in the root cause of the problem. e.g. sudden spike in temperature leading to error in line pack.Creating digital twin of all metering assets allows faster isolation of pipeline sections having calculation errors. e.g. by monitoring the difference between field and ideal parameters.Having a central meter diagnostics system that combines the data from meters of different make and models improve the pattern recognition and error detection ability.Gross error detection isolates the meters inducing error. The feedback can be provided to the machine learning algorithms for root cause analysis.\n Note: This paper only covers the gross error of meters. There are methods used to reduce other meter errors namely random, limiting and systematic not covered in this paper. Readers are requested to read relevant material to understand the complete scope of errors in metering systems.","PeriodicalId":11328,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/197689-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Pipelines are the most economically viable mode of transportation for oil and gas. Every pipeline is monitored 24×7 using meters distributed across the pipeline. Flow, temperature and pressure meters are the most common and essential for continuous and efficient operation of pipelines. Like any other instrument these meters also have uncertainty and prone to error due to irregular calibration, drift, gross error and other such events. The overall accuracy of pipeline metering increases as the distance between consecutive meters decreases. It is also affected by the placement of meters at critical locations like pipeline tapouts, tapins and consumers points. Economics do not allow pipeline operators to install beyond a certain amount of metering assets. The complexity to efficiently calculate the product in and out of a gas pipeline is more compared to a liquid pipeline. It arises due to the high compressibility of gases compared to liquids. Gas pipelines operate at much higher pressure than oil pipelines. The trapped gas inside a gas pipeline can be called line pack of that pipeline. The line pack is very sensitive to two natural factors pressure and temperature of the pipeline. Oil pipelines carry one fluid at a time. Gas pipelines on the other hand carry several gases as a mixture. Unlike oil, gas billings are calculated as the energy the gas mixture carries to the consumer. Due to the mixture, gas composition is another essential factor to accurately calculate energy of the mixture. This paper discusses the challenges of calculating various transport factors and phenomena in gas pipelines and how methods like gross error correction and machine learning can be used to increase the accuracy. The results and conclusions are derived from the applications of these methods to natural gas transportation pipeline. Some of most important conclusions obtained were Understanding the pattern of on-field meter data with ideal meter provides insights in the root cause of the problem. e.g. sudden spike in temperature leading to error in line pack.Creating digital twin of all metering assets allows faster isolation of pipeline sections having calculation errors. e.g. by monitoring the difference between field and ideal parameters.Having a central meter diagnostics system that combines the data from meters of different make and models improve the pattern recognition and error detection ability.Gross error detection isolates the meters inducing error. The feedback can be provided to the machine learning algorithms for root cause analysis. Note: This paper only covers the gross error of meters. There are methods used to reduce other meter errors namely random, limiting and systematic not covered in this paper. Readers are requested to read relevant material to understand the complete scope of errors in metering systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气体调节与提前误差减少
管道是最经济可行的石油和天然气运输方式。每个管道都使用分布在管道上的仪表进行监控24×7。流量、温度和压力仪表是管道连续高效运行最常见和必不可少的仪表。像任何其他仪器一样,这些仪表也有不确定性,并且由于不规则校准,漂移,总误差和其他此类事件而容易出错。随着连续仪表之间距离的减小,管道计量的整体精度也随之提高。它还受到仪表在关键位置的放置的影响,如管道接口、接口和消费者点。从经济角度来看,管道运营商不允许安装超过一定数量的计量设备。与液体管道相比,有效地计算进出气体管道的产品要复杂得多。它是由于气体的压缩性比液体高而产生的。天然气管道在比石油管道高得多的压力下运行。被困在燃气管道内的气体称为该管道的管线包。管线填料对管道压力和温度这两个自然因素非常敏感。石油管道每次只输送一种液体。另一方面,天然气管道以混合物的形式输送几种气体。与石油不同,天然气的账单是根据混合气体带给消费者的能量来计算的。由于混合气的存在,气体成分是准确计算混合气能量的另一个重要因素。本文讨论了计算天然气管道中各种输送因素和现象的挑战,以及如何使用总误差校正和机器学习等方法来提高准确性。结果和结论是通过这些方法在天然气输送管道中的应用得出的。获得的一些最重要的结论是:理解现场仪表数据与理想仪表的模式,可以深入了解问题的根本原因。例如,温度突然升高导致线路包出现错误。创建所有计量资产的数字孪生可以更快地隔离存在计算错误的管道部分。例如,通过监测现场和理想参数之间的差异。拥有一个集中的仪表诊断系统,该系统结合了不同品牌和型号的仪表数据,提高了模式识别和错误检测能力。粗误差检测隔离了仪表产生的误差。这些反馈可以提供给机器学习算法进行根本原因分析。注:本文只涉及仪表的粗误差。还有一些方法可以用来减少其他仪表误差,即随机误差、限制误差和系统误差,本文未涉及。请读者阅读相关材料,以了解计量系统的完整误差范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of bag-of-features (BoF) technique for weed management in sugarcane production Spraying deposits using different nozzles and application volumes for pest management of cotton at reproductive stage Opioid Prescription in Switzerland: Appropriate Comedication use in Cancer and Noncancer Pain Co-Development Aspects of Super Giant Reservoirs With Condensate-Rich Gas Cap Healing Total Losses and Establishing Well Integrity with Engineered Fiber-Based Lost Circulation Control Spacer During Primary Cementing in UAE Offshore
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1