Managing clinical risk retrospectively and prospectively with a risk management framework in an acute care hospital in Singapore

Mahdhir Bin Amat Tugiman, Xiao-dong Tan, J. Chia, G. Lim
{"title":"Managing clinical risk retrospectively and prospectively with a risk management framework in an acute care hospital in Singapore","authors":"Mahdhir Bin Amat Tugiman, Xiao-dong Tan, J. Chia, G. Lim","doi":"10.5430/ijh.v7n2p22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To expound on the implementation of the clinical risk management framework in an acute care hospital to minimise clinical risks and improve patient safety on account of systemic and human risk factors and patterns.Methods: The clinical risk management framework involves a 2-pronged approach through retrospective and prospective methods. The 5 stages of the retrospective approach include data collection, data aggregation, risk assessment and prioritisation, risk mitigation, and lastly, risk monitoring. The prospective approach entails horizon scanning which aims to detect risks early and ensure controls are swiftly implemented to prevent harm from arising. When combined, the framework seeks to be responsive to reduce the possibility and severity of patient harm. The number of incidents and risk scores for top clinical risks from 2016 to 2019 were monitored and studied to assess the effectiveness of the newly implemented clinical risk management framework.Results: When the clinical risk management framework was implemented in 2017, the number of incidents as well as corresponding risk scores for many of the identified clinical incident types and root causes decreased over the years. Most notably, two top clinical risks, results not being reviewed or delayed, and staff inadequate skills and knowledge, saw major improvements in risk scores.Conclusions: The systematic workflow of the 2-pronged clinical risk management framework allows the campus to manage risks comprehensively and efficiently. While retrospective risk analysis examines and reacts to reported clinical incidents, amidst volatile circumstances and advancements of technology exposing unprecedented risks in healthcare, prospective risk analysis conducted through horizon scanning is useful in anticipating and acting before harm arises, ultimately resulting in improved patient safety.","PeriodicalId":73454,"journal":{"name":"International journal of healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/ijh.v7n2p22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To expound on the implementation of the clinical risk management framework in an acute care hospital to minimise clinical risks and improve patient safety on account of systemic and human risk factors and patterns.Methods: The clinical risk management framework involves a 2-pronged approach through retrospective and prospective methods. The 5 stages of the retrospective approach include data collection, data aggregation, risk assessment and prioritisation, risk mitigation, and lastly, risk monitoring. The prospective approach entails horizon scanning which aims to detect risks early and ensure controls are swiftly implemented to prevent harm from arising. When combined, the framework seeks to be responsive to reduce the possibility and severity of patient harm. The number of incidents and risk scores for top clinical risks from 2016 to 2019 were monitored and studied to assess the effectiveness of the newly implemented clinical risk management framework.Results: When the clinical risk management framework was implemented in 2017, the number of incidents as well as corresponding risk scores for many of the identified clinical incident types and root causes decreased over the years. Most notably, two top clinical risks, results not being reviewed or delayed, and staff inadequate skills and knowledge, saw major improvements in risk scores.Conclusions: The systematic workflow of the 2-pronged clinical risk management framework allows the campus to manage risks comprehensively and efficiently. While retrospective risk analysis examines and reacts to reported clinical incidents, amidst volatile circumstances and advancements of technology exposing unprecedented risks in healthcare, prospective risk analysis conducted through horizon scanning is useful in anticipating and acting before harm arises, ultimately resulting in improved patient safety.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新加坡一家急症护理医院的风险管理框架对临床风险进行回顾性和前瞻性管理
目的:阐述在某急症医院实施临床风险管理框架,以最大限度地降低临床风险,提高患者安全,考虑到系统和人为的风险因素和模式。方法:临床风险管理框架包括回顾性和前瞻性双管齐下的方法。回顾性方法的5个阶段包括数据收集、数据汇总、风险评估和确定优先顺序、风险缓解以及最后的风险监测。前瞻性方法需要水平扫描,其目的是及早发现风险,并确保迅速实施控制措施,以防止产生危害。结合起来,该框架寻求对减少患者伤害的可能性和严重程度作出反应。对2016 - 2019年最高临床风险事件数和风险评分进行监测和研究,以评估新实施的临床风险管理框架的有效性。结果:2017年实施临床风险管理框架时,已确定的许多临床事件类型和根本原因的事件数量和相应的风险评分逐年下降。最值得注意的是,两个最大的临床风险,即未审查或延迟结果,以及工作人员技能和知识不足,在风险评分方面有了重大改善。结论:双管齐下的临床风险管理框架系统的工作流程,使校园能够全面、高效地管理风险。虽然回顾性风险分析检查并对报告的临床事件作出反应,但在不稳定的环境和技术进步暴露出医疗保健领域前所未有的风险的情况下,通过水平扫描进行的前瞻性风险分析有助于在伤害发生之前预测和采取行动,最终提高患者的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using AI-based virtual triage to improve acuity-level alignment of patient care seeking in an ambulatory care setting School-based strategies to prevent depression in adolescents: An integrative review Green buildings and their impact on health outcomes and dietary intake: What do we know? Ukrainian refugee women’s experiences of settlement and navigating health and social services in Canada Whether sodium and fluid restriction reduce exacerbations and readmissions for patients with heart failure: An integrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1