Canada as Churkendoose: A Response to Paul Kellogg, Escape from the Staple Trap

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Socialist Studies Pub Date : 2017-05-29 DOI:10.18740/S4705X
J. Lawson
{"title":"Canada as Churkendoose: A Response to Paul Kellogg, Escape from the Staple Trap","authors":"J. Lawson","doi":"10.18740/S4705X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This response is based on a presentation as part of a panel on Paul Kellogg's Escape from the Staples Trap at the annual meeting of the Society for Socialist Studies. The responder welcomes Kellogg's diligent use of statistics and argumentation in critiquing the left-nationalist tradition, including its emphasis on staples (raw-material exports) as central to Canada as a \"rich dependency\" and false comparisons with countries of the Global South.  It also suggests a possible one-sided over-emphasis on Canada's membership in top-tier advanced industrialized societies, and questions the general emphasis on categorization at the expense of a more humanistic multi-sidedness, or of an acceptance of ironic or paradoxical categorizations.  Some features of Kellogg's positive case about Canada, including \"extractivism\", need to be more clearly distinguished from the approaches he rejects. Finally, the categorical rejection of the possibility of a sound left-nationalism may need to be explained or qualified.","PeriodicalId":29667,"journal":{"name":"Socialist Studies","volume":"16 1","pages":"147-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialist Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18740/S4705X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This response is based on a presentation as part of a panel on Paul Kellogg's Escape from the Staples Trap at the annual meeting of the Society for Socialist Studies. The responder welcomes Kellogg's diligent use of statistics and argumentation in critiquing the left-nationalist tradition, including its emphasis on staples (raw-material exports) as central to Canada as a "rich dependency" and false comparisons with countries of the Global South.  It also suggests a possible one-sided over-emphasis on Canada's membership in top-tier advanced industrialized societies, and questions the general emphasis on categorization at the expense of a more humanistic multi-sidedness, or of an acceptance of ironic or paradoxical categorizations.  Some features of Kellogg's positive case about Canada, including "extractivism", need to be more clearly distinguished from the approaches he rejects. Finally, the categorical rejection of the possibility of a sound left-nationalism may need to be explained or qualified.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大是Churkendoose:对保罗·凯洛格的《逃离订书钉陷阱》的回应
这一回应是基于在社会主义研究协会年会上保罗·凯洛格的《逃离斯台普斯陷阱》专题讨论小组的发言。回答者欢迎凯洛格在批评左翼民族主义传统时勤奋地使用统计数据和论证,包括强调主食(原材料出口)是加拿大的核心,是一个“富裕的依赖”,以及与全球南方国家的错误比较。它还表明可能片面地过分强调加拿大在顶级先进工业化社会中的成员资格,并质疑以牺牲更人性化的多边性为代价普遍强调分类,或接受具有讽刺意味或自相矛盾的分类。凯洛格关于加拿大的积极案例的一些特点,包括“榨取主义”,需要更清楚地与他所反对的方法区分开来。最后,对健全的左翼民族主义可能性的断然拒绝可能需要解释或限定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Auntie Dialogues Reflections on the Struggle Against the Free Trade Agreement (FTA), Three Decades On Canada's National Questions, Free Trade and the Left Reflections on the Struggle Against the Canada-US Free Trade Agreement (TFA), 30 Years Later C.B. Macpherson on Marxism and the Eighties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1