A Comparison of Triploid Induction Validation Techniques

R. Harrell, W. V. Heukelem, J. Kerby
{"title":"A Comparison of Triploid Induction Validation Techniques","authors":"R. Harrell, W. V. Heukelem, J. Kerby","doi":"10.1577/1548-8640(1998)060<0221:ACOTIV>2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Triploidy induction is a technique that allows genetic manipulation of chromosome number to control reproduction and potentially create faster-growing animals; however, most methods for inducing polyploidy are not 100% effective. Using sunshine bass (white bass Morone chrysops ♀ × striped bass M. saxatilis ♂) as a model, we cross-validated the most common verification techniques: DNA staining and fluorescence quantification with a flow cytometer, erythrocyte nuclear volume with a Coulter counter particle size analyzer, silver staining of nucleolar organizer regions (NORs), and cytological karyotyping. Results indicated that the electronic techniques of particle size analysis and flow cytometry were the simplest and quickest methods of validation. The major drawback of both electronic ploidy determination methods is the cost of the equipment required for analysis. Cytological karyotyping was the most accurate method for determining polyploidy because actual chromosome numbers were determined. It w...","PeriodicalId":22850,"journal":{"name":"The Progressive Fish-culturist","volume":"39 1","pages":"221-226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Progressive Fish-culturist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8640(1998)060<0221:ACOTIV>2.0.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Abstract Triploidy induction is a technique that allows genetic manipulation of chromosome number to control reproduction and potentially create faster-growing animals; however, most methods for inducing polyploidy are not 100% effective. Using sunshine bass (white bass Morone chrysops ♀ × striped bass M. saxatilis ♂) as a model, we cross-validated the most common verification techniques: DNA staining and fluorescence quantification with a flow cytometer, erythrocyte nuclear volume with a Coulter counter particle size analyzer, silver staining of nucleolar organizer regions (NORs), and cytological karyotyping. Results indicated that the electronic techniques of particle size analysis and flow cytometry were the simplest and quickest methods of validation. The major drawback of both electronic ploidy determination methods is the cost of the equipment required for analysis. Cytological karyotyping was the most accurate method for determining polyploidy because actual chromosome numbers were determined. It w...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三倍体诱导验证技术的比较
摘要:三倍体诱导是一种允许对染色体数目进行遗传操作以控制繁殖并可能创造更快生长动物的技术;然而,大多数诱导多倍体的方法并不是100%有效。以白鲈鱼(Morone chrysops♀×条纹鲈鱼M. saxatilis♂)为模型,交叉验证了最常用的验证技术:流式细胞仪DNA染色和荧光定量、Coulter计数粒度分析仪红细胞核体积、核核组织区(NORs)银染色和细胞学核型。结果表明,电子粒度分析和流式细胞术是最简单、最快速的验证方法。两种电子倍性测定方法的主要缺点是分析所需设备的成本。细胞学核型是确定多倍体最准确的方法,因为实际的染色体数目是确定的。w…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Formalin for External Protozoan Parasites Evaluation of Razorback Sucker and Colorado Squawfish Batch Marking Techniques Acute toxicity of ammonia and nitrite to shortnose sturgeon fingerlings Growth of Juveniles and Egg Production of Mummichogs Fed Different Diets in the Laboratory Growth and Survival of Lake Sturgeon Larvae Fed Formulated Diets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1