{"title":"Soybean Looper Control with Dipel Es, 1992:","authors":"C. A. White, B. R. Leonard, P. Clay","doi":"10.1093/iat/18.1.276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The efficacy of Dipel ES at selected rates was compared to a recommended rate of Larvin and an untreated control for soybean looper control at the Macon Ridge Branch of the Northeast Research Station near Winnsboro, LA. The test consisted of a randomized block design with 4 replications. Plots were 5 rows (1.02 m centers) by 9.0 m of soybeans in the R5 growth stage planted 18 Jun. Treatments were applied with a tractor mounted boom equipped with a compressed air delivery system calibrated to deliver 93.6 liters/ha at 2.8 kg/cm2 through 2 TX-8 hollow cone nozzles equally spaced per row. Insecticides were applied on 1 Sep and treatments were evaluated at 2 and 7 DAT using 2 samples of 20 sweeps with a standard 38.2 cm diam sweep net. The plots received 3.0 cm rainfall on 2 Sep and a trace amount of rainfall on 3 Sep.","PeriodicalId":13691,"journal":{"name":"Insecticide and Acaricide Tests","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insecticide and Acaricide Tests","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/iat/18.1.276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The efficacy of Dipel ES at selected rates was compared to a recommended rate of Larvin and an untreated control for soybean looper control at the Macon Ridge Branch of the Northeast Research Station near Winnsboro, LA. The test consisted of a randomized block design with 4 replications. Plots were 5 rows (1.02 m centers) by 9.0 m of soybeans in the R5 growth stage planted 18 Jun. Treatments were applied with a tractor mounted boom equipped with a compressed air delivery system calibrated to deliver 93.6 liters/ha at 2.8 kg/cm2 through 2 TX-8 hollow cone nozzles equally spaced per row. Insecticides were applied on 1 Sep and treatments were evaluated at 2 and 7 DAT using 2 samples of 20 sweeps with a standard 38.2 cm diam sweep net. The plots received 3.0 cm rainfall on 2 Sep and a trace amount of rainfall on 3 Sep.