Human rights education in indonesian higher education institutions: opinions of students and teachers

Aloysia Vira Herawati, D. Ermakov
{"title":"Human rights education in indonesian higher education institutions: opinions of students and teachers","authors":"Aloysia Vira Herawati, D. Ermakov","doi":"10.21831/cp.v41i2.45343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As problems of intolerance and disrespect of human rights escalate in this modern world, raising public awareness on human rights is considered an inevitable task for all. Intervention of promoting human rights in education field is believed to be playing an important role to address the problems. This study wants to collect information from its research subjects on the extent to which topics of human rights are being learned and taught in higher education institutions, and on the degree of effectiveness of different methods used to learn and teach human rights in higher education institutions, as to develop human rights knowledge and understanding of students. This study uses the technique of homogenous purposive sampling to determine the research subject. The research subjects are (1) students who take the course subject of Human Rights or Citizenship and (2) lecturers who teach either the course subject of Human Rights or Citizenship, in any higher education institutions in Indonesia. The questionnaire is developed using Google Form, and is distributed online. As the result of the survey for 445 students and 72 teachers of Indonesian higher educational institutions, most of them are familiar with the concept of human rights. The most significant sources of information on human rights are university lecturers, mass media, official documents, and publications. The most important level of education to receive knowledge and build understanding on human rights are secondary education, higher education, elementary education, and vocational education. General human rights, right to freedom of religion and belief, and right to education are fully developed. More of other rights, such as rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ), rights of migrants, rights of internally displaced persons, and rights of the poor, are expected to be more developed than they are now. The most effective methods are field visit/excursions, watching films, problem solving, and case studies. The least effective methods are arts (drawing and singing), writing essays and stories, and games.","PeriodicalId":17767,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v41i2.45343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

As problems of intolerance and disrespect of human rights escalate in this modern world, raising public awareness on human rights is considered an inevitable task for all. Intervention of promoting human rights in education field is believed to be playing an important role to address the problems. This study wants to collect information from its research subjects on the extent to which topics of human rights are being learned and taught in higher education institutions, and on the degree of effectiveness of different methods used to learn and teach human rights in higher education institutions, as to develop human rights knowledge and understanding of students. This study uses the technique of homogenous purposive sampling to determine the research subject. The research subjects are (1) students who take the course subject of Human Rights or Citizenship and (2) lecturers who teach either the course subject of Human Rights or Citizenship, in any higher education institutions in Indonesia. The questionnaire is developed using Google Form, and is distributed online. As the result of the survey for 445 students and 72 teachers of Indonesian higher educational institutions, most of them are familiar with the concept of human rights. The most significant sources of information on human rights are university lecturers, mass media, official documents, and publications. The most important level of education to receive knowledge and build understanding on human rights are secondary education, higher education, elementary education, and vocational education. General human rights, right to freedom of religion and belief, and right to education are fully developed. More of other rights, such as rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ), rights of migrants, rights of internally displaced persons, and rights of the poor, are expected to be more developed than they are now. The most effective methods are field visit/excursions, watching films, problem solving, and case studies. The least effective methods are arts (drawing and singing), writing essays and stories, and games.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印尼高等教育机构的人权教育:学生与教师的意见
随着不容忍和不尊重人权的问题在这个现代世界升级,提高公众对人权的认识被认为是所有人的一项不可避免的任务。促进人权在教育领域的干预被认为对解决这些问题起着重要作用。这项研究希望从其研究对象收集有关高等教育机构学习和教授人权主题的程度的信息,以及关于高等教育机构用于学习和教授人权的不同方法的有效性程度,以发展学生的人权知识和理解。本研究采用同质目的抽样的方法确定研究对象。研究对象是(1)在印度尼西亚的任何高等教育机构中学习人权或公民权课程的学生和(2)教授人权或公民权课程的讲师。调查问卷是用Google表单制作的,并在网上分发。根据对印尼高等教育机构的445名学生和72名教师的调查结果,他们中的大多数人都熟悉人权的概念。关于人权的最重要信息来源是大学讲师、大众传播媒介、官方文件和出版物。中学教育、高等教育、初等教育和职业教育是获得人权知识和建立对人权理解的最重要的教育层次。一般人权、宗教信仰自由权、受教育权得到充分发展。更多的其他权利,如女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者和酷儿(LGBTQ)的权利、移民的权利、国内流离失所者的权利和穷人的权利,预计将比现在得到更多的发展。最有效的方法是实地考察/游览、看电影、解决问题和案例研究。最无效的方法是艺术(绘画和唱歌),写文章和故事,以及游戏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence in education: Effects of using integrative automated writing evaluation programs on honing academic writing instruction Building the Foundation for Creativity and Collaboration: Knowledge Sharing Learning Models Principal change leadership and e-learning effectiveness: The mediating role of teachers work commitment and attitudes toward change Factors affecting learner autonomy in the context of English language learning The noble character-based learning in the ornaments of Kraton Yogyakarta: A visual analysis of Javanese cultural heritage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1